MISKONSEPSI SISWA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL HIMPUNAN BERDASARKAN TAHAPAN MASON

Authors

  • Andy Dwi Melianti Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Edy Yusmin Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Asep Nursangaji Pendidikan Matematika FKIP Universitas Tanjungpura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26418/ja.v1i2.42883

Abstract

There are facts obtained through interviews and observations of students' answers that the VII grade students of SMP LKIA Pontianak are suspected of having misconceptions. Based on theses facts, the purpose of this research is to reveal the form of misconception based on Mason stages and the causes of the misconception. The subjects involved in this research were fifteen students. This research is a case study research with a descriptive method. Data collection tools used modified CRI diagnostic tests and interviews. Based on data analysis, the misconceptions experienced by students in completing set operations consisted of notation misconceptions, generalization and specialization. Researchers found out of the three forms of misconception, the most common is notation misconception. In the problem solving stage according to Mason consists of three stages, namely   entry, attack, and review, students who experience misconceptions in two stages, namely at the entry stage, students experience notation misconceptions and at the review stage, students experience misconceptions of notation, generalization, and specialization. Researchers found the causes of misconceptions consisted of three factors, namely students' associative thinking, incomplete / wrong reasoning, and wrong intuition. Researchers found out of the three forms of misconception, the most common is wrong intuition.                    

Keyword: Causes of Misconceptions, Mason Stages, Misconceptions

References

Ariefia, Evanty, Hellda. 2016. Proses Berpikir Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Permasalahan pada Materi Trigonometri. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika. 1(28).

Ashlock. (2008). Misconception and Error Patterns. [online]. http://ptgmedia.pearsoncmg.com/images/9780135009109/downloads/Ashlock_Ch1_MisconceptionsandErrorPatterns. pdf, diakses tanggal 23 November 2019.

Edogawatte, G. 2011. Secondary School Students’ Misconceptions in Algebra. Department of Curriculum, Teaching, and Learning University of Toronto.

LEARN. (2008). Algebra: Some Common Misconceptions. [Online]. http://www.learnquebec.ca/export/sites/learn/en/content/curriculum/mst/documents/algemisc. pdf, diakses tanggal 23 November 2019.

Lin, F. L. 2007. Designing Mathematics Conjecturing Activities to Foster Thinking and Constructing Actively. [Online]. (http://cried.tsubasa.ac.jp/math/apec/apec2007/paper. pdf, diakses tanggal 4 Febuari 2020).

Mason, J., Burton, L., & Stacey K. 2010. Thinking Mathematically. Second Edition. Wokingham. UK: Addison Wesley.

Ormord, J.E. (2009). Psikologi Pendidikan Jilid 1. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Ozkan, E.M. 2011. Misconceptions in Radicals in High School Mathematics. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences (15), 120—127.

Polya, G. 1973. How To Solve It Second Edition. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.

Siregar, Eveline, & Nara, Hartini. 2010. Teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.

Suparno, Paul. 2005. Miskonsepsi dan Perubahan Kosep dalam Pendidikan Fisika. Jakarta: Grasindo.

T, Natalia, Karolin. Miskonsepsi pada Penyelesaian Soal Aljaba Siswa Kelas VIII Berdasarkan Proses Berpikir Mason. Jurnal Pendidkan. 1(10), 1917-1925.

Tayubi, Y. R., (2005). Identifikasi miskonsepsi pada konsep-konsep fisika dengan menggunakan CRI Certainty of Response Indeks). [online]. (http://file.upi.edu/direktori/jurnal/jurnalmimbar_pendidikan/mimbar_no_32005/Identifikasi_Miskonsepsi_Pada_Konsep_Konsep_Fisika_Menggunakan_Certainty_Of_Response_Index_(CRIs). pdf, diakses tanggal 24 November 2019.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-08