PROSES BERPIKIR MATEMATS SISWA DITINJAU DARI SELF-CONFIDENCE MATERI GARIS DAN SUDUT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26418/ja.v4i2.69921Keywords:
Berpikir Matematis, Self-Confidence, Garis dan SudutAbstract
This study aims to determine and describe the mathematical thinking process of students in terms of self confidence in the material of lines and angles. The research method used is descriptive qualitative. This research involved 20 students of class VII SMP Negeri 4 Sungai Raya. The results of this study indicate that students with mathematical thinking processes with high self-confidence when solving line and angle problems are able to identify and translate information into mathematical form, students also apply the concept of lines and angles, can identify elements of the concept then develop it into a procedure, re-examine answers and plan problem solving. Students whose mathematical thinking process with moderate self-confidence when solving line and angle problems are able to identify and translate information into mathematical form, able to apply the concept of line and angle, can identify elements of the concept then developed into procedures, but students answer only until explaining and checking back and cannot plan problem solving. Students whose mathematical thinking process with low self-confidence are only able to identify and translate information into mathematical form and apply the concept of lines and angles, but cannot identify elements of the concept, cannot develop it into a procedure and also cannot explain and check back each step and cannot plan problem solving.
References
Afifah, A., Hamidah, D., & Burhani, I. (2019). Studi Komparasi Tingkat Kepercayaan Diri (Self Confidence) Siswa antar Kelas Homogen dengan Kelas Heterogen di Sekolah Menengah Atas. Happiness, Vol.3 No.1. Kediri
Anderson, L.W., dan Krathwohl, D.R. (2001). A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assesing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. New York: Addison Wesley Longman. Inc.
Amalia, R. (2017). Kemampuan Berpikir Matematis Mahasiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Geometri. EDU-MAT: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.20527/edumat.v4i2.2568
Anderson, L. W., Krathwohl, D. R., & Bloom, B. S. (2002). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: a revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. 41(4), 352. http://books.google.com/books?id=JPkXAQAAMAAJ&pgis=1
Prilanita, Y. N., & Susilowati, N. (2022). Students’ Thinking Ability Predicted Through Questioning Skills. Heritage: Journal of Social Studies |, 3(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.35719/hrtg.v3i1.77
Sulistyowati, E., & Fitriawan, D. (2022). Pemanfaatan Media Pembelajaran E-Learning di Era New Normal. Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Ekonomi FKIP UM Metro, 1(1), 21–27.
Bloom, B.S., Engelhart, M.D., Furst, E,J., Hill, W.H., dan Krathwohl, D.R. (1956). The Taxonomy of Educational Objectives The Classification of Educational Goals, Handbook I: Cognitive Domain. New York: David: McKay.
NCTM. (2000). Principal and Standards for School Mathematics. United States of America: The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Inc.
Sabri. (2012). “Berpikir Matematis Untuk Pemahaman pada Tingkat Kesadaraâ€. Jurnal Matematika Universitas Negeri Makassar. Vol.4, No.5. Makassar.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal AlphaEuclidEdu

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.