LEMBAR KERJA MAHASISWA TERINTEGRASI MODEL GUIDED INTERACTION IN TEAM (GIT) UNTUK PENDIDIKAN LINGKUNGAN HIDUP

Authors

  • Ilmi Zajuli Ichsan Universitas Mohammad Husni Thamrin
  • Euis Winarti Politeknik LP3I Jakarta
  • Santhi Pertiwi Universitas Mohammad Husni Thamrin
  • Sugi Alibowo Universitas Mohammad Husni Thamrin
  • Feryl Ilyasa Universitas Negeri Jakarta
  • Eva Yuliana Universitas Wiralodra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26418/edunaturalia.v6i2.100111

Abstract

Environmental education implemented at the tertiary level often impacts changes in student behavior. This makes the development of environmental education at the tertiary level important to be carried out sustainably. The purpose of this study was to develop a student worksheet integrated with the Guided Interaction in Team (GIT) model. The method used in this study was research and development (R&D). The results of this study indicate that the student worksheet integrated with the GIT model has a very valid category with a percentage of expert I scores of 90% and a percentage of expert II scores of 87.50%, making it suitable for use in learning. The results of this study confirm that learning innovations need to be continuously developed better so that environmental education can run properly. The conclusion of this study is that the developed student worksheet is valid for use in classroom learning. Suggestions for further research are to develop other learning models that are more integrated with learning tools.

References

Akbar, S. (2013). Instrumen perangkat pembelajaran. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Alam, S., Sumaryanto, F. T., Jazuli, M., & Syakir. (2020). Visual culture-based art learning uses internet to improve higher-order thinking skills in early childhood. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(2), 3847–3851.

Amaral, J. A. A. D., & Santos, R. J. R. L. D. (2018). Combining project-based learning and community-based research in a research methodology course: The lessons learned. International Journal of Instruction, 11(1), 47–60.

Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. New York: Springer.

Cheng, J. C. H., & Monroe, M. C. (2012). Connection to nature: Children’s affective attitude toward nature. Environment and Behavior, 44(1), 31–49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916510385082

Dewi, L. P. R. K., & Dartanto, T. (2019). Natural disasters and girls' vulnerability: Is child marriage a coping strategy of economic shocks in Indonesia? Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 14(1), 24–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450128.2018.1546025

Fitriani, U., Adisyahputra, A., & Komala, R. (2018). Eco-friendly website development in biology learning based on project activities on environmental pollution. Biosfer: Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi, 11(1), 32–46. https://doi.org/10.21009/biosferjpb.11-1.4

Fu, L., Zhang, Y., Xiong, X., & Bai, Y. (2018). Pro-environmental awareness and behaviors on campus: Evidence from Tianjin, China. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 14(1), 427–445. https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/77953

Ichsan, I. Z., Pertiwi, S., & Alibowo, S. (2025). Model pembelajaran Guided Interaction in Team (GIT): Inovasi pendidikan lingkungan hidup berbasis biologi untuk mahasiswa PGSD. Edunaturalia: Jurnal Biologi dan Kependidikan Biologi, 6(1), 129–135. https://doi.org/10.26418/edunaturalia.v6i1.93088

Kerret, D., Orkibi, H., Bukchin, S., & Ronen, T. (2020). Two for one: Achieving both pro-environmental behavior and subjective well-being by implementing environmental-hope-enhancing programs in schools. Journal of Environmental Education, 51(6), 434–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2020.1765131

Kinslow, A. T., Sadler, T. D., & Nguyen, H. T. (2018). Socio-scientific reasoning and environmental literacy in a field-based ecology class. Environmental Education Research. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2018.1442418

Marconi, A., Schiavo, G., Zancanaro, M., Valetto, G., & Pistore, M. (2018). Exploring the world through small green steps: Improving sustainable school transportation with a game-based learning interface. In C. T., M. A., L. F., & M. M. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Advanced Visual Interfaces (AVI). New York: Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3206505.3206521

Meleady, R., Abrams, D., Van de Vyver, J., Hopthrow, T., Mahmood, L., Player, A., Lamont, R., & Leite, A. C. (2017). Surveillance or self-surveillance? Behavioral cues can increase the rate of drivers’ pro-environmental behavior at a long wait stop. Environment and Behavior, 49(10), 1156–1172. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517691324

Miller, A. L. (2018). The role of creative coursework in skill development for university seniors. Global Education Review, 5(1), 88–107.

Misiaszek, G. W. (2020). Ecopedagogy: Teaching critical literacies of “development,” “sustainability,” and “sustainable development.” Teaching in Higher Education, 25(5), 615–632. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1586668

Muzana, S. R., Jumadi, Wilujeng, I., Yanto, B. E., & Mustamin, A. A. (2021). E-STEM project-based learning in teaching science to increase ICT literacy and problem solving. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(4), 1386–1394. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i4.21942

Pyrri, I., Zoma, A., Barmparesos, N., Assimakopoulos, M. N., Assimakopoulos, V. D., & Kapsanaki-Gotsi, E. (2020). Impact of a green roof system on indoor fungal aerosol in a primary school in Greece. Science of the Total Environment, 719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137447

Raman, R. A. (2017). Attitudes and behavior of Ajman University of Science and Technology students towards the environment. IAFOR Journal of Education, 4(1), 69–88. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.4.1.04

Soares, J., Miguel, I., Venâncio, C., Lopes, I., & Oliveira, M. (2021). Public views on plastic pollution: Knowledge, perceived impacts, and pro-environmental behaviours. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.125227

Downloads

Published

2025-11-29

Issue

Section

Articles