Rotor Speed Analysis of SMC-based IFOC for Low-Speed Induction Motor Control

Authors

  • Angga Wahyu Aditya Department of Electrical Engineering Politeknik Negeri Balikpapan, Balikpapan, Indonesia http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5806-1477
  • Ihsan Ihsan Department of Electrical Engineering Politeknik Negeri Balikpapan, Balikpapan, Indonesia http://orcid.org/0009-0005-4985-9734
  • Fachri Husaini Department of Electrical Engineering Politeknik Negeri Balikpapan, Balikpapan, Indonesia
  • Faisal Faiiz Ramadhanu Department of Electrical Engineering Politeknik Negeri Balikpapan, Balikpapan, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26418/elkha.v15i2.67321

Keywords:

SMC, induction motor, IFOC, boundary layer, low speed control.

Abstract

The control of electric motors, particularly three-phase induction motors, has developed rapidly due to their application in industry. Indirect Field Oriented Control (IFOC) is one of the most widely used control systems due to its ease of application. IFOC controls a three-phase induction motor in the same way as a DC motor. However, IFOC requires a Sliding Mode Control (SMC) controller with Lyapunov stability theory to ensure robustness and stability. In exceptional conditions, such as low-speed settings, the SMC-based IFOC requires unique sets to operate with a steady-state error (Ess) at a speed response of less than 2%. Other parameters to be considered are rise time and electromagnetic torque response at low speeds. The addition of the boundary layer of the hyperbolic tangent function to a first-order SMC can increase induction motor (IM) control up to 175 rpm with a value of Ess = 1.96% compared to the saturation and signum functions, which are only capable of a reference speed of 300 rpm in no-load conditions with a value of Ess = 2% for the saturation function and 1.94% for the signum function. SMC with the hyperbolic tangent function boundary layer performs best under load conditions. The rising time value does not significantly differ under no-load or torque-load conditions between the SMC with the saturation, hyperbolic tangent function boundary layers and without the boundary layer. Adding a boundary layer with the hyperbolic tangent function can reduce ripple significantly compared to the saturation function under no-load or load conditions.

Author Biographies

Angga Wahyu Aditya, Department of Electrical Engineering Politeknik Negeri Balikpapan, Balikpapan, Indonesia

Publication TopicsPWM invertors,air gaps,electric current control,induction motors,machine vector control,magnetic flux,magnetic hysteresis,multilayer perceptrons,nonlinear control systems,stators

Ihsan Ihsan, Department of Electrical Engineering Politeknik Negeri Balikpapan, Balikpapan, Indonesia

Teknologi Informasi

References

M. Drakaki, Y. L. Karnavas, P. Tzionas, and I. D. Chasiotis, “Recent Developments Towards Industry 4.0 Oriented Predictive Maintenance in Induction Motors,†Procedia Comput. Sci., vol. 180, pp. 943–949, Jan. 2021.

A. W. Aditya, I. Ihsan, R. M. Utomo, and H. Hilmansyah, “Evaluasi Motor Listrik Sebagai Penggerak Mobil Listrik,†JRST (Jurnal Riset Sains dan Teknologi), vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 55-59, Sep. 2019.

Y. Dhayaneswaran and L. Ashok Kumar, “A study on current characteristics of induction motor while operating at its base frequency in textile industry,†Energy, vol. 74, no. C, pp. 340–345, Sep. 2014.

S. J. Rind, Y. Ren, Y. Hu, J. Wang, and L. Jiang, “Configurations and control of traction motors for electric vehicles: A review,†Chinese J. Electr. Eng., vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1–17, Dec. 2017.

S. Vadi, R. Bayindir, Y. Toplar, and I. Colak, “Induction motor control system with a Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) and Profibus communication for industrial plants — An experimental setup,†ISA Trans., vol. 122, pp. 459–471, Mar. 2022.

Y. Kumsuwan, W. Srirattanawichaikul, and S. Premrudeepreechacharn, “A simple voltage and frequency control of VSI-inverter-fed self-excited induction generator drive,†2009 ICCAS-SICE, 2009. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/5335133 (accessed Jun. 17, 2023).

A. Wahyu Aditya, M. Rizani Rusli, B. Praharsena, E. Purwanto, D. Cahya Happyanto, and B. Sumantri, “The Performance of FOSMC and Boundary - SMC in Speed Controller and Current Regulator for IFOC-Based Induction Motor Drive,†Proc. - 2018 Int. Semin. Appl. Technol. Inf. Commun. Creat. Technol. Hum. Life, iSemantic 2018, pp. 139–144, Nov. 2018.

D. C. Happyanto, A. W. Aditya, and B. Sumantri, “Boundary–Layer Effect in Robust Sliding Mode Control for Indirect Field Oriented Control of 3-Phase Induction Motor,†Int. J. Electr. Eng. Informatics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 188–204, Jun. 2020.

D. Fereka, M. Zerikat, and A. Belaidi, “MRAS Sensorless Speed Control of an Induction Motor Drive based on Fuzzy Sliding Mode Control,†2018 7th Int. Conf. Syst. Control. ICSC 2018, pp. 230–236, Dec. 2018.

G. Arpit, H. P. Singh, and K. Pandey, “Advance speed control of three phase induction motor using field oriented control method,†Mater. Today Proc., vol. 80, pp. 1981–1985, Jan. 2023.

K. Kecepatan Motor Induksi et al., “Kendali Kecepatan Motor Induksi 3 Fase Berbasis Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO),†ELKOMIKA J. Tek. Energi Elektr. Tek. Telekomun. Tek. Elektron., vol. 8, no. 3, p. 477, Aug. 2020.

H. Sathishkumar and S. S. Parthasarathy, “A novel neural network intelligent controller for vector controlled induction motor drive,†Energy Procedia, vol. 138, pp. 692–697, Oct. 2017.

H. Sathishkumar and S. S. Parthasarathy, “A novel neuro-fuzzy controller for vector controlled induction motor drive,†Energy Procedia, vol. 138, pp. 698–703, Oct. 2017.

J. K. Jain, S. Ghosh, S. Maity, and P. Dworak, “PI controller design for indirect vector controlled induction motor: A decoupling approach,†ISA Trans., vol. 70, pp. 378–388, Sep. 2017.

Y. A. Zorgani, M. Jouili, Y. Koubaa, and M. Boussak, “A Very-Low-Speed Sensorless Control Induction Motor Drive with Online Rotor Resistance Tuning by Using MRAS Scheme,†Power Electron. Drives, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 125–140, Jun. 2019.

E. Purwanto, I. Ferdiansyah, S. D. Nugraha, and O. A. Qudsi, “The Effect of ANFIS Controller on The Performance of Induction Motor Drives in Low-Speed Operation Based on IFOC,†Int. J. Adv. Sci. Eng. Inf. Technol., vol. 11, no. 2, p. 440, Apr. 2021.

Y. Zahraoui, M. Akherraz, C. Fahassa, and S. Elbadaoui, “Induction Motor DTC Performance Improvement by Reducing Flux and Torque Ripples in Low Speed,†J. Robot. Control, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 93–100, Jan. 2022.

D. C. Happyanto and A. W. Aditya, “Chattering reduction effect on power efficiency of IFOC based induction motor,†J. INFOTEL, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 154–160, May 2022.

E. Taheri, M. H. Ferdowsi, and M. Danesh, “Design Boundary Layer Thickness and Switching Gain in SMC Algorithm for AUV Motion Control,†Robotica, vol. 37, no. 10, pp. 1785–1803, Oct. 2019.

H. Abu-Rub, A. Iqbal, and J. Guzinski, High Performance Control of AC Drices With MATLAB/Simulink Models, Second Edi. John Wiley & Sons Ltd, 2021.

A. Aditya, A. W. Aditya, I. Ihsan, R. M. Utomo, and H. Hilmansyah, “Pemodelan State Space Motor Induksi Tiga Fasa Sebagai Penggerak Mobil Listrik,†J. Teknol., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 39–48, Feb. 2020.

S. Kapat, “Chattering-Free Event-Trigger Fast Recovery Stable Digital Sliding Mode Control in DC-DC Converters,†Conf. Proc. - IEEE Appl. Power Electron. Conf. Expo. - APEC, pp. 1248–1252, 2022.

T. T. Tran and V. H. Nguyen, “A Novel Design of Chattering-free Sliding Mode Control for a Nonlinear Dynamic System,†2021 4th Int. Conf. Robot. Control Autom. Eng. RCAE 2021, pp. 213–217, 2021.

R. Ramezanzadeh, S. M. H. Baygi, J. Farzaneh, and A. Karsaz, “Chattering-free blood glucose level control based on ANFIS,†IEEE Int. Conf. Fuzzy Syst., Aug. 2017.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2023-10-23

Issue

Vol. 15 No.2 October 2023

Section

Vol. 15 No. 2 October 2023

License

Copyright (c) 2023 ELKHA : Jurnal Teknik Elektro

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

1. Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Open Access


Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution License  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See  The Effect of Open Access).

2. Proposed Policy for Journals That Offer Delayed Open Access


Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

    1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication, with the work [SPECIFY PERIOD OF TIME] after publication simultaneously licensed under a  Creative Commons Attribution License  that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
    2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
    3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See  The Effect of Open Access).