The Implementation Reality Gap of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in the Indonesian EFL Context: A Systematic Review of Challenges and Effective Strategies in Elementary School Settings

Authors

  • Rosniarti Rosniarti Tanjungpura University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26418/jefle.v6i2.103400

Keywords:

Communicative Language Teaching, CLT Challenges, Elementary School, EFL Strategies, Students' Barriers

Abstract

Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) has long been recognized as the dominant pedagogical approach in English as a Foreign Language (EFL) education, particularly in Indonesian elementary schools.(Yang, 2024). Despite its theoretical popularity, significant discrepancies remain between the principles of CLT and its classroom implementation. This systematic review aims to bridge this implementation-reality gap by synthesizing empirical findings from fifteen peer-reviewed journal articles focusing on CLT practices in the context of Indonesian and other Asian EFLs. Using thematic synthesis, the review identified two main clusters of challenges and strategies. Student-related challenges include barriers, low motivation, and limited Willingness to Communicate (WTC), while teacher-related challenges include inadequate methodological competence and inadequate training in communicative classroom management. In contrast, effective strategies are categorized into pedagogical and managerial dimensions. Pedagogically, teachers use communicative games, task-based activities, and authentic materials to foster interaction and engagement. Managerially, scaffolding, individualized support, and a positive classroom climate help sustain communicative learning. Overall, this review highlights the persistent gaps in CLT implementation in Indonesian primary classrooms and underscores the need for ongoing teacher professional development and psychologically supportive learning environments to ensure the successful realization of communicative pedagogy.

References

Alharbi, A. S. (2021). Barriers in Implementing Communicative Language Teaching Approach : EFL Learners ’ Perspective. 12(9), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/12-9-01

Dewi, N. R. (2019). Teachers’Difficulties in Implementing Communicative Language Teaching (Clt) At High Schools in Medan. International Seminar and Annual Meeting BKS …, 549–

http://conference.unsri.ac.id/index.php/semirata/article/view/982

Fajriyah, E., Barkah, M., Nurhidayat, E., & Syarifah, E. F. (2023). Title Page : Write the article title here clearly and concisely. 2(1), 1–10.

Fauzi, N. I. (2025). The Impact of Communicative Language Teaching on English Speaking Skills. 6(3), 1774–1781.

Gan, L., & Li, H. (2024). The Application of the Communicative Language Teaching ( CLT ) Pedagogy in Chinese Primary English Classrooms. 6, 74–81. https://doi.org/10.23977/trance.2024.060610

Laila, F. N., & Adityarini, H. (2023). Challenges and Strategies in Teaching English Speaking Skills to Young Learners : Perspectives of Teachers in Indonesia. 7(3), 542–556.

Laksono, K. T., Maret, U. S., Rohimah, N. K., Maret, U. S., Fauziati, E., & Surakarta, U. M. (2024). EXPLORING CHALLENGES OF INDONESIAN EFL TEACHERS IN IMPLEMENTING DIFFERENTIATED INSTRUCTION IN ELT CLASSROOM. 6(2), 1–14.

https://doi.org/10.19105/panyonara.v6i2.14661

Moharana, M. J. (2021). Role of Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) in Improving the Communicative Competence of the Second Language Learners of English. IOSR Journal of Humanities And Social Science (IOSR-JHSS, 26(9), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837- 2609044149

Muttaqiin, M. (2023). Learning english through communicative language teaching for elementary school students. 4(2), 94–100.

Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22(October), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069231205789

Nam, H., & Studies, A. (2023). Challenges and Constraints of Implementing Communicative Language Teaching : Teacher-Related vs . Non-Teacher-Related Factors. 0672(1).

Pajangu, P. R. B., Tamelan, T. M., Kamengko, D. F., Tengah, S., Kristen, U., Wacana, A., Unit, C., Kristen, U., & Wacana, A. (2024). IMPROVING STUDENTS ’ SPEAKING SKILLS THROUGH COMMUNICATIVE LANGUAGE TEACHING METHOD AT SMP 1. 2(1), 25–

https://doi.org/10.1357/l.v2i1.20

Richards, J. C., Language, C., & Today, T. (2017). No Title. 05(2), 54–66.

Robah, A., & Anggrisia, N. F. (2023). Exploring challenges and strategies in English speaking among Indonesian university students : A case study of AKM university. 11(1), 55–74.

Yang, L. (2024). The Evolution and Effectiveness of Communicative Language Teaching: A Comprehensive Literature Review. Scientific Journal of Technology, 6(7), 67–74. https://doi.org/10.54691/7e22k564

Yogi Anggraena, Dion Ginanto, Nisa Felicia, Ardanti Andiarti, Indriyati Herutami, Leli Alhapip,

D. S. (2022). Panduan Pembelajaran dan Asesmen Kurikulum 2013. Seminar Pendidikan IPA Pascasarjana UM, 123.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-31