Improving Students"™ Vocabulary Achievement Through What Comes Next Technique

Authors

  • Irfan Agung Wiranto Universitas Tanjungpura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26418/jefle.v4i1.68229

Abstract

Vocabulary is one of the important aspects to master a language. However, in SMA Tahfizul Qur"™an Labbaik, vocabulary becomes an issue because most of the students are lack of vocabulary. Most of the students seem confused every time they want to speak in English directly in the classroom because they do not know the vocabulary. Therefore, as one of the English teachers on that school, the writer really wanted to solve this issue. In order to solve the problem, the writer chose What Comes Next technique (WCNT) to teach vocabulary. This study was set out in order to know how the implementation of What Comes Next technique improve students"™ vocabulary to the twelfth-grade male students of SMA Tahfizul Qur"™an Labbaik Pontianak in the academic year 2020/2021. This study was conducted in Classroom Action Research (CAR) in three cycles. The research subjects in this study were twenty twelfth grade male students. In collecting the data, the writer used field note, observation checklist, and students"™ vocabulary test. The findings showed that using What Comes Next technique helped the students improve their vocabulary. Furthermore, using the What Comes Next technique also boosted the students' motivation. Students' enthusiasm and activity rates were also improved as a result of the technique. All of these things can be seen after each cycle. In summary, the writer absolutely recommends other English teachers to apply What Comes Next technique as one of various techniques in their teaching process, especially in teaching vocabulary and action verbs.

Keywords: What Comes Next; teaching technique; vocabulary; action verbs; classroom action research

References

Barcroft, J., Schmitt, N., & Sunderman, F. G. (2011). The routledge handbook of applied linguistics. Abingdon, UK / New York: Routledge.

https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203835654

Bintz, William. P. (2011). Teaching vocabulary across the curriculum. Middle School Journal, 42. 44-53.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00940771.2011.11461773

Clouston, M. L. (2013). Teaching Vocabulary. TESOL International Association. ISBN: 978-1931185974. Retrieved from

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/258918745 TeachingVocabulary

Cohen, R. L., & Otterbein, N. (1992). The mnemonic effect of speech

gestures: Pantomimic and non-pantomimic gestures compared. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/09541449208406246

Foster, J. K. (2009). Memory: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780192806758.001.0001

Hall, W. & Keynes, M. (2005). Action research: A guide for associate lectures. England: The Open University. Retrieved from

http://disde.minedu.gob.pe/bitstream/handle/20.500.12799/3590/

Action%20Research%20A%20Guide%20for%20Associate%20Lecturers. pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Hatch, E. M., & Farhady, H. (1982). Research design and statistics for applied linguistics. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House. Retrieved from

https://www.academia.edu/21204031/Research_design_and_statistics_for_applied_linguistics_Evelyn_Hatch_and_Hossein Farhady

Kita, S., Alibali, M. & Chu, M. (2017). How do gestures influence thinking and speaking? The gesture for conceptualization hypothesis. Psychological review, 124(3). https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000059

Laufer, B. (2005). Focus on form in second language vocabulary learning. EUROSLA Yearbook. https://doi.org/10.1075/eurosla.5.11lau

Lindstromberg, S. (2010). Language activities for teenagers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511733024

Macedonia, M. & Kriegstein, V. K. (2012). Gestures enhance foreign language learning. Biolinguistics, 64. 393-416. Retrieved from

https://www.researchgate.net/publication

/256195161_Gestures_Enhance_Foreign_Language_Learning

Najeebullah, Ullah, I. & Kaleem, M. (2020). Effects of teaching vocabulary at elementary level through the eclectic approach. Pakistan Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research. 3(2). 35-49. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication

/350609488EFFECTS_OF_TEACHING_VOCABULARY_AT_ELEMEN

TARY_LEVEL_THROUGH_THE_ECLECTIC_APPROACH

Nation, P. (2015). Principles guiding vocabulary learning through extensive reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 27(1). 136-145.

https://doi.org/10.26686/wgtn.12543404.v1

Sunubi, A. H., Hamrah, A., & Jabu, B. (2016). Designing instructional vocabulary material based on fishbone for university students of english in parepare. Journal of Language and Literature, 7(4).

https://doi.org/10.7813/jil.2016/7-4/30

Tellier, M. (2005). How do teacher’s gestures help young children in second language acquisition? Lyon: France. Retrieved from

https://www.researchgate.net/publication/39064128

_How_do_teacher's_gestures_help_young_children_in_second_language_acquisition

Wickham, R. (2012). Role play, dance, mime as language arts – for DPLI. Brighton Education Learning Service. Retrieved from

https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read /6121270/role-play-dance-mime-as-language-arts-for-dpl

Downloads

Published

2023-07-31

Issue

Section

Articles