PENGEMBANGAN TES DIAGNOSTIK FOUR TIER TEST DILENGKAPI DENGAN SELF-DIAGNOSIS SHEET TENTANG ENERGI DI SMA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26418/jippf.v1i1.41854Keywords:
Energy, Four Tier Diagnostic Test, Self-diagnosis SheetAbstract
The purpose of this research is to produce a qualified diagnostic test that can be used to discover students"™ misconceptions about energy in high school"™s 10th graders. This research uses Research and Development (R&D) with the form of four tier test. The development of diagnostic test uses the adoption of Borg & Gall development steps that has been simplified into seven steps. The inisial design consists of twelve item of test of multiple choices. The trial step of this diagnostic test was done to 35 students in the in the small scale trial, and 91 students in the large scale trial. According to the data analysis, it can be concluded that the developed diagnostic test is qualified of the use to discover students"™ misconceptions, because: 1) has higher validity than table validity, 2) has of reliabily of 0,783, 3) all items of the diagnostic can discover students"™ misconceptions, 4) has a diffuculty index 0,38, 5) the level of readability of the questions 0,63. The qualified items that worth of use of this test are twelve items
References
Amin, N. Wiendartun. Samsudin, A, (2016). ‘Analisis Instrumen Tes Diagnostik Dynamic-Fluid Conceptual Change Inventory (DFCCI) Bentuk Four-Tier Test pada Beberapa SMA di Bandung Raya’, Simposium Nasional Inovasi dan Pembelajaran Sains (SNIPS), pp 570-574.
Azwar, S. (2009). Reliabilitas dan Validitas. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Borg, W.R, & Gall, M.D. (1983). Education Research An Introduction. New York : Longman.
Caloen, I. S. & Subramaniam, R. (2010). “Do Students Know What They Know and What They Don’t Know? Using a Four-Tier Test to Assess the Nature Of Students’. Alternatif Conceptionsâ€. Res Sci Euc, 40 : 313-337.
Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. (2007). Tes Diagnostik. Jakarta: Direktorat Pembinaan Sekolah Menengah Pertama.
Dolan, E. (2010). “Recent Researh in Science Teaching and Learningâ€. CBE-Life Science Education, 9: 76-77.
Fauzan. (2010). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik Kesulitan Belajar Fisika di SMA. Disertasi. Yogyakarta: PPs UNY.
Republik Indonesia.2003. Undang-undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional. Sekretariat Negara.Jakarta.
Rusillowati, Ani. (2015). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik sebagai Alat Evaluasi Kesulitan Belajar Fisika. Volume 6 Nomor 1 2015 ISSN: 2302-7827.
Sudijono, Anas. (2011). Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta : Rajawali Pers.
Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suwarto. (2013). Pengembangan Tes Diagnostik dalam Pembelajaran . Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.
Tatlah, Ijaz Ahmed, dkk. (2017) . An Investigation of Students’ Learning Difficulties in Mathematics at Secondary Level. India: Colloge Road Towship Lahore.
Waskito & Kumaidi. (2010) . Asesmen untuk memantau kualitas pendidikan. Pengem-bangan model analisis prestasi belajar untuk mengidentifikasi kesulitan belajar peserta didik. Jakarta: UIN Syarif Hidayatullah Jakarta.
Zaleha. (2017). Pengembangan Instumen Tes Diagnostik VCCI Bentuk Four-tier Test pada Konsep Getaran. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia, Bandung.
