PENERAPAN MODUL PENILAIAN MISKONSEPSI IPA MATERI SUHU DAN KALOR TERINTEGRASI CRI (Certainly Of Response Index) MELALUI METODE BLENDED LEARNING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26418/jippf.v2i2.48156Keywords:
Misconceptions, CRI, Temperature and Heat, Blended LearningAbstract
A B S T R A C T
This study was taken based on the results of observations and interviews of researchers at SMP Negeri 2 Lubuklinggau which showed that many students had misconceptions in science about temperature and heat, as many as 84 percent of students had misconceptions about the concept of changing temperature from Celsius to Fahrenheit, 75% of students did not understand the meaning of temperature and heat material In everyday life, students' misconceptions about changes in the state of matter and factors of heat change. This study aims (1) how to analyze students' misconceptions on temperature and heat material after applying the Blended Learning model and (2) measure the validity and practicality of the temperature and heat science misconception assessment module according to students' needs. The location of this research is SMP Negeri 2 Lubuklinggau City. This research was conducted in Class VII.1 and VII.2 even semesters, namely from January to July 2021. The development model used was the Borg and Gall models. Data collection techniques in this study 1) documentation based on the CRI Diagnostic Test, 2) interviews, and 3) questionnaires. Analysis of the data that has been collected was analyzed by quantitative descriptive. Based on the results of research using the temperature and heat science misconceptions assessment module, the validity level is 37.5% (valid), the average field test student response is 3.8 with a very practical category and the effectiveness of the science misconception assessment module increases the number of students who understand the concept of using the Blended Learning model of 95.03% (very good). The effectiveness of the module is seen from the student's test scores after using the Science misconceptions assessment module for Temperature and Heat material. There are 80 students who take the test. There are 12 students who understand the concept and 68 students still have misconceptions.
References
Ahlif, U. F., dkk. (2014). Analisis Penurunan Miskonsepsi Siswa Setelah Mengikuti Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe STAD Berbantuan Simulasi Komputer. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Tadulako. Vol. 2 No. 3. 57-59. [online]: http://jurnal.untad.ac.id/jurnal/index.php/EPFT/article/view/3181/2246. [17 Juli 2021]
Alhinduan, S. S. R., Kurniawan, Y., & Muliyani, R. (2016). Identifikasi Kuantitas Siswa yang Miskonsepsi Menggunakan Three Tier-Test pada Materi Listrik Dinamis. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika, 1(1).
Bell, A, Kelton, J, MacDonough, N, et al. (2011) A critical evaluation of the usefulness of a coding scheme to categorize levels of reflective thinking. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education 23(7): 797–815
B. J. Bonk and C. R. Graham, 2005, Handbook of Blended Learning: Global Perspectives, Local Designs. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer Publishing, San Francisco, CA, 2005).
B. R. Graham and et al, 2003, Benefits and Challenges of Blended Learning Environments. M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Information Science and Technology I-V. (Idea Group Inc, Hershey, PA, 2003).
Daryanto. 2010. Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2020). Buku Panduan Merdeka Belajar-Kampus Merdeka. http://dikti.kemdikbud.go.id/wpcontent/uploads/2020/04/Buku-Panduan-Merdeka-Belajar-Kampus-Merdeka-2020. Di akses pada tanggal 30 Juni 2020.
D.Young, Hugh dan Roger A, Friedman (2002), Fisika Universitas (Terjemahan) Jilid 1. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Emzir. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif Analisis Data. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
Fayakun, M &Joko, P. (2015). Efektivitas Pembelajaran Fisika Menggunakan Model Kontekstual (CTL) dengan Metode Predict, Observe, Explain Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia. 11(1); 49-58. DOI: 10.15294/jpfi.v11i1.4003.
Gall, Joyce P. Gall & Walter R. Borg (2010). Educational Research in Introduction. Logman.
Gusmalia, R. (2016). Penggunaan Asesmen Peta Konsep Untuk Menganalisis Miskonsepsi Siswa Pada Materi Ekosistem Kelas X SMA Al-Azhar 3 Bandar Lampung. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi.
Hasan, S., D. Bagayoko, D., and Kelley, E. L., (1999), Misconseptions and the Certainty of Response Index (CRI), Phys. Educ. 34(5), pp. 294 - 299.
ilviani, R., Muliyani, R., & Kurniawan, Y. (2017). Penerapan Three Tier-Test untuk Identifikasi Kuantitas Siswa yang Miskonsepsi pada Materi Magnet. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Fisika, 2(1).
Imaduddin, M., Tantayanon, S., Hidayah, F. F., & Zuhaida, A. (2020). Pre-service science teachers’ impressions on the implementation of small-scale chemistry practicum. Thabiea : Journal of Natural Science Teaching Vol. 3(2), pp. 162-174, 2020 Available online at http://journal.iainkudus.ac.id/index.php/Thabiea p-issn: 2580-8474, e-issn: 2655-898X. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v3i2.8893
John, M. C. (1999). Concept Map Assesment of Classroom Learning: Reliability, Validity and Logistical Proticality. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36(4).
Kanginan, M. 2007. IPA untuk SMP Kelas X. Jakarta: Erlangga.
Mentari, L., dkk. (2014). Analisis Miskonsepsi Siswa SMP pada Pembelajaran Kimia untuk Materi Larutan Penyangga. Jurnal Kimia Visvitalis. Vol. 2 No. 1. 76-87. [online]: http://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JJPK /article/view/3975/3169. [6 April 2016]
Mirriahi N, Joksimović S, Gašević D, et al. (2018) Effects of instructional conditions and experience on student reflection: A video annotation study. Higher Education Research and Development 37(6): 1245–59.
Mulyatiningsih, E. (2014). Metode Penelitian Terapan Bidang Pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Muna, I. A. (2015). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa PGMI pada Konsep Hukum Newton Menggunakan Certainty Of Response Index (CRI). Jurnal Cendekia. Vol. 13 No. 2. 309-321.http://jurnal.stainponorogo.ac.id/index.php/cendekia/article/view/251/221. [7 Juli 2021]
Murni, D. (2013). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa pada Konsep Substansi Genetika Menggunakan Certainty Of Response Index (CRI). Prosidng Semirata FMIPA Universitas Lampung. 205-211. [online]:http://jurnal. fmipa.unila.ac.id/index.php/semirata/article/view/671/491. [17 Juli 2021]
Mosik, & Maulana, P. (2010). Usaha Mengurangi Terjadinya Miskonsepsi Fisika Melalui Pembelajaran Dengan Pendekatan Konflik Kognitif. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 6, 98–103.
Mustika, A.A., dkk. 2014. Identifikasi Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Biologi Universitas Negeri Makassar pada Konsep Genetika dengan Metode CRI. Jurnal SainSMPt. Vol. 3 No. 2. 122-129. [online]:http:// ojs.unm.ac.id/index.php/sainSMPt/article/view/1119. [16 Maret 2016]
Nurhasanah, N., Kasmita, W., Aswirna, P., Abshary, FI., (2020). Developing Physics E-Module Using “Construct 2â€to Support Students' Independent Learning Skills. Thabiea : Journal of Natural Science Teaching, Vol. 3 (2), 79-94. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v3i2.8048
Pudjawan K, I., dkk. (2014). Model Penelitian Pengembangan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Setiawan, Denny, dkk. (2017). Pengembangan Modul. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka
Sugiyono. 2013. Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Syahrul, D. A., & Setyarsih, W. (2015). Identifikasi Miskonsepsi dan Penyebab Miskonsepsi Siswa dengan Three-tier Diagnostic Test Pada Materi Dinamika Rotasi. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika (JIPF), 04(03).
Tegeh, I., dkk. (2014). Model Penelitian Pengembangan. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.
Trisnawati, D. (2012). Penerapan Peta Konsep Pada Pokok Bahasan Tekanan Untuk Mendeskripsikan Penguasaan Konsep Siswa. Physics Education Journal, 1(1).
Utomo, L. A., & Muslimin. (2015). Pengembangan Bahan Ajar Berbasis Multimedia Pembelajaran Interaktif Model Borg And Gall Materi Listrik Dinamis Kelas X SMA Negeri 1 Marawola. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Tadulako (JPFT). 4(2);10-16.
Wahyudi, Ismu. (2011). Analisis Penguasaan Konsep Dan Miskonsepsi Mahasiswa Terhadap Konsep Dasar Elektrodinamis Menggunakan Model Certainty Of Response Index (CRI). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan 2012, FKIP Unila, Halaman 137 – 148.
Wahyuningsih, T., Raharjo, T., & Masithoh, D. F. (2013). Pembuatan Intrumen Tes Diagnostik Fisika SMA Kelas XI. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, 1(1).
Widoyoko.(2019). Evaluasi program pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Yasa , G. A. A. S., (2012). Pengembangan Modul Online Mata Pelajaran Micro Teaching dengan Model Borg & Gall pada Program S1 Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris STKIP Agama Hindu Singaraja. Tesis. Program Studi Teknologi Pembelajaran, Program Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Singaraja. 1-16.
Yolanda, Y. (2020). Development of Contextual-Based Teaching Materials in The Course of Magnetic Electricity. Thabiea: Journal of Natural Science Teaching Vol. 3(1), pp. 59-69, 2020 Available online at http://journal.iainkudus.ac.id/index.php/Thabiea p-issn: 2580-8474, e-issn: 2655-898X. http://dx.doi.org/10.21043/thabiea.v3i1.6616
Yolanda, Y. (2017). Remediasi Miskonsepsi Kinematika Gerak Lurus dengan Pendekatan STAD. SPEJ (Science and Physic Education Journal), 1(1), 39-48. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31539/spej.v1i1.76
Yuliyanti, T.E & A. Rusilowati. (2014). Analisis Modul Ajar Fisika SMA Kelas XI Berdasarkan Muatan Literasi Sains di Kabupaten Tegal. Unnes Physics Education Journal. No. 3 Vol 2, hal 68-72.
Yuliati, Yuyu & Dudu Suhandi Saputra. (2020). Membangun Kemandirian Belajar Mahasiswa Melalui Blended Learning di Masa Pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Elementaria Edukasia,3(1).
