Analisis Indikator Fundamental Ekonomi Daerah di Kalimatan Barat: Pertumbuhan Ekonomi, Pendapatan Perkapita dan HDI

Authors

  • Nurul Bariyah Universitas Tanjungpura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26418/jebik.v4i1.11462

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the profile and classification of districts and cities in West Kalimantan based on indicators of local economic fundamentals such as economic growth, per capita income and the Human Development Index (HDI). Secondary data were obtained from the BPS West Kalimantan and other related agencies for the years 2005 - 2011. In the processing of secondary data to answer the purpose, this study uses local typology analysis tools to determine the pattern and structure of economic growth in each region (Kuncoro, 2004) which divides area into four categories: (1) regions with high-income and high economic growth; (2) regions with high-income and low economic growth; (3) regions with low-income and high economic growth; and (4) regions with low income and low economic growth.The research found development gaps between the City of West Kalimantan (Pontianak and Singkawang) and other districts where both cities have high-performance in economic growth, income per capita and HDI. None of the districts that have high performance in all three indicators. 11 other districts have diverse performance. Policy development at the district and municipal level should be based on development goals on a scale of local, provincial and national levels with a convergent pattern. This will facilitate the development of the region in the future.

 

References

Anderson, V. (1991). Alternative Economic Indicator. New York: Routledge.

Bappenas, (2013). Data dan Informasi Kinerja Pembangunan 2004-2012.

BPS, (2010).Kalimantan Barat Dalam Angka 2010, Badan Pusat Statistik Provinsi Kalimantan Barat, Pontianak.

Batiz, F. L. R.,& Batiz, L. A. R. (1994). International finance and open economy macroeconomics, Second Edition, , New York: Mac-millan Publishing Company.

Froyen, R.T. (1996).Macroeconomics theories &policies Fifth Edition. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall International Editions.

Frumkin, N. (1990). Guide to economic indicators. New York: M.E. Sharpe Armonk.

Irawan & Suparmoko, (1992), Ekonomika pembangunan, Edisi V. Yogyakarta: BPFE.

Keynes, J. M. (1936). The general theory of employment, interest and money. Macmillan Cambridge University Press.

Kuncoro, M. (1997).Ekonomi Pembangunan: Teori, Masalah, dan Kebijakan, Edisi Ketiga, Yogyakarta: UPP AMP YKPN.

Kuncoro, M. (2001).Metode kuantitatif, teori dan aplikasi untuk bisnis dan ekonomi, Edisi Ketiga, Yogyakarta: UPP AMP YKPN.

Kuncoro, M. (2004).Otonomi dan pembangunan daerah, reformasi, perencanaan, strategi dan peluang. Jakarta: Penerbit Erlangga.

Samuelson, P.A., & Nordhaus, W.D. (1995). Economics, International Edition, Fifteen Edition, New York: Mc Graw Hill.

Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. University of Chicago Press.

Sukirno, S. (1985).Ekonomi Pembangunan: Proses, Masalah dan Kebijaksanaan. Jakarta: LP FEUI.

Todaro, M. P. & Smith, S. C. (2012).Economic development 11th Edition. Boston: Addison-Wesley Pearson.

Undang-Undang Nomor 22 Tahun 1999 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah.

Undang-Undang Nomor 25 Tahun 1999 tentang Perimbangan Keuangan Antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah.

Undang-Undang No 32 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemerintahan Daerah

Undang-Undang No 33 Tahun 2004 tentang Perimbangan Keuangan Antara Pemerintah Pusat dan Daerah.

Downloads

Published

2015-04-28