Analisis Atas Annual Report PT Timah Tbk: Studi Interpretive Dalam Perspektif Semiotika dan Retorika

Authors

  • Oktaviani Oktaviani Universitas Tanungpura
  • Rusliyawati Rusliyawati Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Elok Heniwati Universitas Tanjungpura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26418/jebik.v6i2.22988

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze and understand about the integrated annual report (integrated report) of PT Timah Tbk by answering research question about how is the rhetorical aspect and semiotic aspects, that is the aspect of semantic, syntactic, and pragmatic. Interpretive paradigm and semiotic approach is used to analyze the integrated annual report. The data used is integrated annual report of PT Timah Tbk in 2013, 2014 and 2015. This study showed that the semiotic aspects was poured into the points of reporting in the integrated annual report of the company. The integrated annual report of PT Timah Tbk was created by the company as a rhetorical story to build a positive image and to gain legitimacy from its stakeholders.

References

Argandona, A. (2011). Stakeholder Theory and Value Creation. Working Paper No. WP-922. Retrieved from www.iese.edu/research/pdfs/di-0922-e.pdf

Brennan, N. & Gray, S. J. (2000). Rhetoric and Argument in Financial Reporting: disclosures in profit forecasts and takeover documents. ACCA Occasional Research Paper No.31. London: Certified Accountants Educational Trust. Retrieved from http://www2.accaglobal.com/pubs/general/activities/research/ research_archive/orp-031-001.pdf

Budiani, R. J. (2011). Narsisme dalam Pelaporan Keuangan: Analisis Semiotik atas Laporan Keuangan Perusahaan yang Mengalami Kerugian. (Skripsi yang tidak dipublikasikan), Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia.

Camiciottoli, B. C. (2012). Oral Financial Reporting: A Rhetorical Analysis of Earnings Calls. (Unpublished Thesis), Universitas di Pisa, Italy.

Carter P. & Jackson, N.. (2004). For the Sake of Argument: Towards an Understanding of Rhetoric as Process. Jurnal of Management Studies, 41(3), 469-491.

Chariri, A. (2010). Rhetorics in Financial Reporting: An Interpretive Case Study, Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 12(2), 53-70.

Craig, R., Garrott, L. & Amernic, J. (2001). A “Close Reading†Protocol to Identify Perception-Fashioning Rhetoric in Web Site Financial Reporting: The Case of Microsoft. Accounting and The Public Interest, 1(1), 1-16.

Fitriany, K. (2009). Retorika Dalam Pelaporan Keuangan: Analisis Narrative Text Dalam Annual Report Perusahaan yang Mengalami Kerugian. (Skripsi yang tidak dipublikasikan), Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia.

Fontaine, C., Haarman, A & Schmid, S. (2006). The Stakeholder Theory. Retrieved from http://www.martonomily.com/sites/default/files/attach/Stakeholders%20theory. pdf

Harahap, S. S. (2008). Analisa Kritis atas Laporan Keuangan. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada.

Jupe, R. (2005). Disclosures in Corporate Environmental Reports: A Test of Legitimacy Theory. Working Paper No. 91, University of Kent Canterbury. Retrieved from https://kar.kent.ac.uk/id/eprint/24451

Kriyantono, R. (2007). Teknik Praktis Riset Komunikasi. Jakarta: Kencana.

Lim, S. M., Wilmshurt, T., & Shimeld, S (2010). Blowing in the Wind: Legitimacy Theory, an Environmental Incident and Disclosure. In APIRA Conference Proceedings (pp. 1-33). Sydney, Australia: APIRA 2010. Retrieved from http://apira2010.econ.usyd.edu.au/conference_proceedings/APIRA-2010-306-Wilmhurst-Legitimacy-theory-an-environmental-incident-and-disclosure.pdf

Littlejohn, S. W. (2009). Theories of Human Communication (Edisi 9). Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.

Martono. (2016). Evolusi dalam Pelaporan Keuangan Perusahaan: Analisis Semiotik atas Integrated Reporting PT Pertamina. (Skripsi yang tidak dipublikasikan), Universitas Tanjungpura, Indonesia.

Moleong, L. J. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Nugroho, F. A. (2009). Retorika dalam Pelaporan Corporate Social Responsibility: Analisis Semiotik atas Sustainability Report PT Aneka Tambang Tbk. (Skripsi yang tidak dipublikasikan), Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia.

Perelman, C. (1982). The Realm of Rhetoric. Kluback, Notre Dame: The University of Notre Dame Press.

Piliang, Y. A. (2004). Semiotika Teks: Sebuah Pendekatan Analisis Teks. Mediator, 5(2), 189-198.

Pradana, F. A. (2016). Kajian Semiotik Laporan Tahunan PT. Bank Rakyat Indonesia, Tbk Sebelum dan Setelah menjadi Pemenang dalam Annual Report Award. (Skripsi yang tidak dipublikasikan), Universitas Negeri Malang, Indonesia.

Sakina, D. A., Wahyuni, N. I., Mas'ud, I. (2014). Narsisme dalam Pelaporan Corporate Social Responsibility: Analisis Semiotik Atas Sustainability Reporting PT. Kaltim Prima Coal dan PT. Perkebunan Nusantara XIII (Persero). e-Journal Ekonomi Bisnis dan Akuntansi, 1(1), 32-41.

Satori, D & Komariah, A. (2009). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Munawir, S. (2004). Analisis Laporan Keuangan (Edisi 4). Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Sugiyono. (2010). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suwardjono. (2005). Teori Akuntansi: Perekayasaan Pelaporan Keuangan (Edisi 3). Yogyakarta: BPFE.

The International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). (2013). The International Integrated Reporting Framework. Retrived from https://integratedreporting.org/ wp-content/uploads/2013/12/13-12-08-THE-INTERNATIONAL-IR-FRAMEWORK-2-1.pdf

Utomo, S T. (2011). Rasisme dalam Pelaporan Akuntansi: Analisis atas Annual Report PT. Perusahaan Gas Negara, Tbk dan PT. Aneka Tambang, Tbk dalam Perspektif Teori Komunikasi Aksi Habermas. (Skripsi yang tidak dipublikasikan), Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia.

Widiyastuti, Y. (2012). Evolusi dalam Pelaporan Keuangan Perusahaan: Analisis Semiotik atas Integrated Reporting. (Skripsi yang tidak dipublikasikan), Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia.

Young, J. J. (2003). Constructing, Persuading and Silencing: The Rhetoric of Accounting Standards. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28(6), 621-638.

Downloads

Published

2017-08-07