ANALISIS FAKTOR-FAKTOR YANG MEMPENGARUHI MINAT MENGGUNAKAN FINTECH LENDING
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26418/jebik.v10i3.45827Keywords:
Technology Acceptance Model, teknologi finansial, pinjamanAbstract
ABSTRACT
This study aims to examine the determinants of the developed Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) framework. The author used stratified random sampling, and data collection used a survey method. The analysis technique used is multiple regression analysis and path analysis using the IBM SPSS 25 software. The results show that perceived ease of use and perceived risk do not influence attitude towards fintech lending. In contrast, perceived usefulness, relative advantage, and perceived cost influence it, and attitude influences intention to use fintech lending behavior. Moreover, the attitude has a partial mediation role only in the relationship between perceived usefulness and relative advantage to fintech lending using intention. These results support the original model of TAM that states perceived ease of use has a nonsignificant effect on attitude towards using behavior. It suggested that financial technology services foster users to use fintech lending through various ways to tell it is easy enough to use and able to protect users' secure data and information. This study also contributes to giving more empirical evidence for other variables to modify and develop the Technology Acceptance Model.
JEL : G23, G41, G51.
Keywords : Technology Acceptance Model, financial technology, lending.
ABSTRAK
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menguji faktor-faktor pada kerangka kerja yang merupakan pengembangan dari Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Peneliti menggunakan metode stratified random sampling dan pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode survey. Teknik analisis yang digunakan adalah uji regresi berganda dan uji jalur dengan bantuan perangkat lunak IBM SPSS 25. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perceived ease of use dan perceived risk tidak memberikan pengaruh pada sikap terhadap fintech lending. Sebaliknya, perceived usefulness, relative advantage dan perceived cost justru memberikan pengaruh, serta sikap memberikan pengaruh terhadap minat untuk menggunakan fintech lending. Lebih lanjut, sikap memilki mediasi parsial hanya pada hubungan antara perceived usefulness dan relative advantage terhadap minat untuk menggunakan fintech lending. Hasil penelitian ini mendukung model awal TAM yang menyatakan bahwa perceived ease of use memberikan pengaruh yang tidak signifikan terhadap sikap untuk menggunakan. Disarankan bagi penyedia jasa keuangan berbasis teknologi untuk mendorong pengguna fintech lending melalui berbagai langkah untuk menyampaikan kemudahan penggunaan dan fintech mampu melindungi data dan informasi pengguna yang bersifat rahasia. Penelitian ini juga berkontribusi untuk memberikan bukti empiris pada berbagai variabel yang digunakan untuk memodifikasi dan mengembangkan Technology Acceptance Model.
References
Agarwal, S., & Chua, Y. H. (2020). FinTech and household finance: a review of the empirical literature. China Finance Review International, 10(4), 361–376.
Ajzen, I. (2002). Perceived behavioral control, self-efficacy, locus of control, and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 32(4), 665–683.
Al-Fahim, N. H., Jusoh, W. J. W., & Abideen, A. (2016). Factors Affecting the Adoption of Internet Banking Services Among Small and Medium Enterprises in Yemen. Global Advanced Research Journal of Management and Business Studies, 3(9). 432-330.
Al-Jabri, I. M. & Sohail, M. S. (2012). Mobile Banking Adoption: Application of Diffusion of Innovation Theory. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 13(4), 379–391.
Amalia, F. (2016). Book Review: The Fintech Book: The Financial Technology Handbook for Invenstors, Entrepreneurs and Visionaires. Journal of Indonesian Economy and Business, 31(3), 345–348.
Amaro, S., & Duarte, P. (2015). An integrative model of consumers’ intentions to purchase travel online. Tourism Management, 46, 64–79.
Bertea, P. E. (2011). Perceived Risk and Online Shopping Behaviour - A Marketing Perspective. SSRN Electronic Journal.
Bofondi, M., & Gobbi, G. (2017). The Big Promise of Fintech. European Economy (Bank, Regulation and the Real Sector): Fintech and Banking. Friends or Foes?, 2, 107–119.
Cham, T. H., Lim, Y. M., Cheng, B. L., & Lee, T. H. (2016). An Empirical Study on the Determinants of Knowledge Management Systems Success - Evidence from the Banking Industry of Malaysia. VINE Journal of Information and Knowledge Management Systems, 46(1), 2–20.
Cham, T. H., Ng, C. K. Y., Lim, Y. M., & Cheng, B. L. (2018). Factors Influencing Clothing Interest and Purchase Intention: A Study of Generation Y Consumers in Malaysia. The International Review of Retail, Distribution and Consumer Research, 28(2), 174–189.
Chuang, L.-M., Liu, C.-C., & Kao, H.-K. (2016). The Adoption of Fintech Service: TAM perspective. International Journal of Management and Administrative Sciences (IJMAS), 3(07), 1–15.
Chisti, S., & Barberis, J. (2016). The FINTECH Book: The Financial Technology Handbook for Investors, Entrepreneurs and Visionaries. West Sussex: Wiley.
Davis, D. F. (1986). A Technology Acceptance Model for Empirically Testing New End-User Information Systems: Theory and Results (Doctoral dissertation). Massachusets Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States.
Daily Social Research. (2019). Type of Fintech. Moving Towards A New Era In Indonesia’s Financial Industry | Fintech Report 2019.
Darmansyah, Fianto, B.A., Hendratmi, A. & Aziz, P.F. (2020). Factors determining behavioral intentions to use Islamic financial technology: Three competing models. Journal of Islamic Marketing, August 2020.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, 35(8), 982–1003.
Dineshwar, R., & Steven, M. (2013). An Investigation on Mobile Banking Adoption and Usage: A Case Study of Mauritius. Proceedings of 3rd Asia-Pacific Business Research Conference 25–26 February 2013. ISBN: 978-1-922069-19-1. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Elkaseh, A. M., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2016). Perceived Ease of Use and Perceived Usefulness of Social Media for e-Learning in Libyan Higher Education: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 6(3), 192–199.
Financial Stability Board. (2017). Financial Stability Implications from Fintech: Supervisory and Regulatory Issues that Merit Authorities’ Attention. Financial Stability Board, 27 June 2017, page 55.
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Attention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Philippines: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Google, Temasek, & Bain. (2019). e-Conomy SEA 2019. Swipe Up and to The Right: Southeast Asia's $100 Billion Internet Economy. Diunduh dari https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/intl/en-apac/consumer-insights/consumer-trends/e-conomy-sea-2019-swipe-up-and-to-the-right-southeast-asias-100-billion-internet-economy/
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education.
Halilovic, S., & Cicic, M. (2013). Antecedents of information systems user behaviour-extended expectation-confirmation model. Behaviour and Information Technology, 32(4), 359–370.
Huei, C. T., Cheng, L. S., Seong, L. C., Khin, A. A., & Bin, R. L. L. (2018). Preliminary study on consumer attitude towards fintech products and services in malaysia. International Journal of Engineering and Technology(UAE), 7(2), 166–169.
Kalinić, Z., Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J., Muñoz-Leiva, F., & Marinković, V. (2019). The moderating impact of gender on the acceptance of peer-to-peer mobile payment systems. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 38(1), 138–158.
Kementerian Riset Teknologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi. (2019). Profil Perguruan Tinggi. Diunduh dari https://rb.gy/2gmpym
Kim, Y., Park, Y.-J., Choi, J., & Yeon, J. (2015). An Empirical Study on the Adoption of “Fintech†Service: Focused on Mobile Payment Services. Advanced Science and Technology Letters 114, 136–140.
Kleijnen, M., Wetzels, M., & de Ruyter, K. (2004). Consumer acceptance of wireless finance. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 8(3), 206–217.
Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Dertermining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607–610.
Krishanan, D., Khin, A., & Teng, K. (2015). Attitude towards Using Mobile Banking in Malaysia: A Conceptual Framework. British Journal of Economics, Management & Trade, 7(4), 306–315.
Kuo, Y. F., & Yen, S. N. (2009). Towards an understanding of the behavioral intention to use 3G mobile value-added services. Computers in Human Behavior, 25(1), 103–110.
Kurniawan, R. (2019). Examination of the Factors Contributing to Financial Technology Adoption in Indonesia using Technology Acceptance Model: Case Study of Peer to Peer Lending Service Platform. Proceedings of 2019 International Conference on Information Management and Technology, ICIMTech 2019, 1, 432–437.
Kurniawan, T. A., Wardani, D. K., & Widhayati, L. (2019). Pengaruh Keberterimaan Layanan Peer To Peer Lending Kepada Umkm Sebagai Pengguna Dengan Menggunakan Metode Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Jurnal Sosial Ekonomi Dan Humaniora, 5(2), 151–160.
Lee, M. C. (2009). Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: An integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8(3), 130–141.
Lee, S. (2016). User behavior of mobile enterprise applications. KSII Transactions on Internet and Information Systems, 10(8), 3972–3985.
Lu, Y., Yang, S., Chau, P. Y. K., & Cao, Y. (2011). Dynamics between the trust transfer process and intention to use mobile payment services: A cross-environment perspective. Information and Management, 48(8), 393–403.
Luarn, P., & Lin, H. H. (2005). Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(6), 873–891.
Martins, C., Oliveira, T., & PopoviÄ, A. (2014). Understanding the internet banking adoption: A unified theory of acceptance and use of technology and perceived risk application. International Journal of Information Management, 34(1), 1–13.
Morgan-Thomas, A., & Veloutsou, C. (2013). Beyond technology acceptance: Brand relationships and online brand experience. Journal of Business Research, 66(1), 21–27.
Muk, A., & Chung, C. (2015). Applying the technology acceptance model in a two-country study of SMS advertising. Journal of Business Research, 68(1), 1–6.
Nathania, I. (2014). Pengaruh Trust, Relative Advantage, Complexity, Compatibility, Image, Result Demonstrability dan Visibility terhadap Minat Menggunakan Website untuk Berbelanja di tokobagus.com (Skripsi yang tidak dipublikasikan). Widya Mandala Catholic University, Surabaya, Indonesia.
OJK. (2020). Perusahaan Fintech Lending Terdaftar/ Berizin. Diunduh dari https://www.ojk.go.id/id/kanal/iknb/financial-technology/Pages/-Penyelenggara-Fintech-Terdaftar-dan-Berizin-di-OJK-per-14-Agustus-2020.aspx
Pantano, E., & Di Pietro, L. (2012). Understanding consumer’s acceptance of technology-based innovations in retailing. Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 7(4), 1–19.
Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion Of Innovation. New York: The Free Press.
Rosavina, M., Rahadi, R. A., Kitri, M. L., Nuraeni, S., & Mayangsari, L. (2019). P2P lending adoption by SMEs in Indonesia. Qualitative Research in Financial Markets, 11(2), 260–279.
Santoso, B., & Erwin, Z. (2020). Analisis Persepsi Pengguna Aplikasi Payment Berbasis Fintech Menggunakan Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Jurnal Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, 11(1), 49–54.
Shih, Y. Y., & Fang, K. (2004). The use of a decomposed theory of planned behavior to study Internet banking in Taiwan. Internet Research, 14(3), 213–223.
Sijabat, Y. P., Hutajulu, D.M., & Sihombing, P. (2019). Determinasi Technology Acceptance Model Terhadap Niat Penggunaan Fintech Sebagai Alat Pembayaran (Payment). Fintech dan E-Commerce untuk Mendorong Pertumbuhan UMKM dan Industri Kreatif: Prosiding Seminar Nasional Dan Call For Papers Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Tidar, Magelang, 15 Oktober 2019
Suyanto, & Kurniawan, T. A. (2019). Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Tingkat Kepercayaan Penggunaan Fintech pada UMKM dengan Menggunakan Teknologi Acceptance Model (TAM). Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Manajemen Akmenika, 16(1), 175–186.
Svendsen, G. B., Johnsen, J. A. K., Almås-Sørensen, L., & Vittersø, J. (2013). Personality and technology acceptance: The influence of personality factors on the core constructs of the Technology Acceptance Model. Behaviour and Information Technology, 32(4), 323–334.
Tarhini, A., Hassouna, M., Abbasi, M. S., & Orozco, J. (2015). Towards the acceptance of RSS to support learning: An empirical study to validate the technology acceptance model in Lebanon. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 13(1), 30–41.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). Theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186–204.
Vuković, M., Pivac, S., & Kundid, D. (2019). Technology Acceptance Model for the Internet Banking Acceptance in Split. Business Systems Research, 10(2), 124–140.
Wei, S. (2016). Designing optimal regulation for financial innovation in Capital raising – regulatory options for China’s peer-to-peer lending sector. Banking and Finance Law Review, 31(3), 539–572.
Wu, J. H., & Wang, S. C. (2005). What drives mobile commerce? An empirical evaluation of the revised technology acceptance model. Information and Management, 42(5), 719–729.
Yuniarti, V., & Ekowati, W. H. (2019). Faktor-Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Minat Penggunaan Financial Technology Peer to Peer Lending. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.
