Rehabilitation Strategies and Behavioral Transformation of NAPZA Survivors at Yayasan Geratak Sambas

Authors

  • Indah Listyaningrum Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Zulkarnain Zulkarnain Universitas Tanjungpura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26418/j-psh.v17i1.101493

Keywords:

Empowerment, NAPZA survivors, Social learning, Social rehabilitation, Yayasan Geratak Sambas

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the social rehabilitation strategies for NAPZA (narcotics, psychotropics, and other addictive substances) survivors at Yayasan Geratak Sambas by applying the theoretical perspectives of Social Learning Theory, Labelling Theory, and Empowerment Theory. A qualitative descriptive approach was employed, involving in-depth interviews, participant observation, and documentation with survivors, facilitators, and foundation managers. The findings reveal that the rehabilitation process at Geratak Foundation operates through three main stages: (1) admission and initial assessment, (2) social and spiritual rehabilitation, and (3) social reintegration. These stages are implemented through a “therapeutic community” model that integrates spiritual guidance, social activities, and psychological counselling. Field data indicate that approximately 60% of survivors showed improved discipline and responsibility after three months of rehabilitation, 20% experienced significant emotional and social improvements within six months, while the remaining 20% continued to struggle with shame and social stigma despite showing psychological progress. These findings demonstrate that recovery is a gradual and nonlinear process influenced by social support and community acceptance. Through the lens of Social Learning Theory, behavioral changes occur via observation, imitation, and positive reinforcement within a supportive therapeutic environment. Labelling Theory highlights that social stigma poses a major barrier to reintegration, whereas Empowerment Theory emphasizes the importance of individual and community empowerment in fostering moral awareness, resilience, and social independence among survivors. Overall, the community-based rehabilitation strategy implemented by Yayasan Geratak Sambas has proven effective not only in behavioral recovery but also in promoting spiritual awareness, social solidarity, and identity reconstruction.

Author Biographies

Indah Listyaningrum, Universitas Tanjungpura

Department of Social Development, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences

Zulkarnain Zulkarnain, Universitas Tanjungpura

Department of Sociology, Faculty of Social and Political Sciences

References

Alhakim, A., Anakotta, M. Y., Febriyani, E., & Tan, W. (2024). Integrating Social Rehabilitation into the Education System for Adolescent Drug Addicts: Legal Framework, Potential, and Challenges. Fiat Justisia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 18(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v18no1.3352

Amanda, M. P., Humaedi, S., & Santoso, M. B. (2017). Penyalahgunaan Narkoba Di Kalangan Remaja (Adolescent Substance Abuse). Prosiding Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 4(2), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.24198/jppm.v4i2.14392

Andriani, A., Sarmadan, S., & Kusuma, N. (2024). Rehabilitasi Sosial Korban Penyalahgunaan Napza Dalam Mewujudkan Keberfungsian Sosial. WELVAART: Jurnal Ilmu Kesejahteraan Sosial, 5(2), 239–249. https://doi.org/10.52423/welvaart.v5i2.20

Anggiri, R. R., & Andriany, M. (2025). Impact social rehabilitation program on quality of life of inmates with illicit drug use. Jurnal Keperawatan Padjadjaran, 13(2).

Annisa, L., Sitorus, M., & Daulay, N. (2024). Metode pembinaan agama Islam bagi mantan pecandu narkoba di lembaga rehabilitasi narkotika khalid bin walid Medan. IICET: Jurnal EDUCATIO (Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia), 10(1), 549–556. https://doi.org/10.29210/1202424484

Becker, H. S. (1973). Outsiders: Studies in The Sociology of Deviance. The Free Press.

Bogdan, R. C., & Biklen, S. K. (1998). Qualitative Research for Education (3rd edn). Allyn and Bacon.

Citra, A., Triana, A., Sonia, G., & Humaedi, S. (2021). Peran Pekerja Sosial dalam Penerapan Therapeutic Community. Focus: Jurnal Pekerjaan Sosial, 3(2), 159–163. https://doi.org/10.24198/focus.v3i2.31851

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3th ed.) (Third). Sage.

Denzin, N. K. (2017). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315134543

Esterberg, K. G. (2002). Qualitative methods in social research. McGraw-Hil

Firmansyah, D., & Saepuloh, D. (2022). Social Learning Theory: Cognitive and Behavioral Approaches. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Holistik (JIPH), 1(3), 297–324. https://10.55927/jiph.v1i3.2317

Fitriani, F. (2023). Penerapan Therapeutic Community Untuk Mengubah Perilaku Pengguna NAPZA. Jurnal Kajian dan Pengembangan Umat, 6(2), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.31869/jkpu.v6i2.4946

Gunawan. (2016). Rehabilitasi Sosial Berbasis Masyarakat Bagi Korban Menyalahgunaan NAPZA di Yogyakarta. Sosio Konsepsia, 6(1), 18-38.

Hartono, T., Hanami, V., & Prameswari, F. D. (2023). Drug abuse rehabilitation policies in Indonesia: A comparison with Vietnam, Australia and Portugal. Wacana Hukum, 29(2), 163–180. https://doi.org/10.33061/wh.v29i2.9576

Hunter, B. A., Jason, L. A., & Keys, C. B. (2013). Factors of Empowerment for Women in Recovery from Substance Use. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51(1–2), 91–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-012-9499-5

Lokadaya. (2023). Profil Yayasan Geratak Sambas. Pontianak: Lokadaya Research & Development Center.

Mack, N., Woodsong, C., Macqueen, K. M., Guest, G., & Namey, E. (2005). Qualitative Research Methods: A Data Collector’s Field Guide. USAID.

Mahardika, R. U., Purnomo, A., Setiawan, M. F., & Wibowo, A. A. (2024). Rehabilitation Center for Teenage Victims of Drug Abuse Based on a Therapeutic Community (TC) in Banten Province with a Behavior Architecture Approach. Canopy: Journal of Architecture, 13(1), 10–26. https://doi.org/10.15294/canopy.v13i1.9326

Midgley, J. (1998). Social development: The developmental perspective in social welfare (Repr. d. Ausg. von 1995). Sage.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (Edition 3). Sage.

Muslikan, M., & Taufiq, M. (2019). Pelaksanaan Assesmen Tentang Rehabilitasi Terhadap Korban Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Ditinjau Dari Peraturan Perundang-Undangan. Jurnal Ilmiah Living Law, 11(1), 61–80. https://doi.org/10.30997/jill.v11i1.1639

Nazhifah, S. A. M., & Jamaluddin, M. (2024). Dukungan Sosial Sebagai Sarana Pemulihan Remaja Pecandu Narkoba Jenis Methamphetamine Pasca Rehabilitasi. Jurnal Psimawa: Diskursus Ilmu Psikologi & Pendidikan, 7(1), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.36761/jp.v7i1.4061

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7th edn). Pearson.

Nurhadiyanto, L., & Samudra, D. N. (2024). Rehabilitasi Penyalahguna Narkoba Berbasis Pendekatan Ikatan Sosial (Social Bonding Theory). IKRA-ITH HUMANIORA: Jurnal Sosial dan Humaniora, 8(2), 133–139. https://doi.org/10.37817/ikraith-humaniora.v8i2.3108

Parangga, U. L. (2025). Evaluasi Teori Labeling Dalam Proses Stigma Dan Stigmatifikasi Pelaku Kejahatan Menurut Howard Becker. Global Research and Innovation Journal (GREAT), 1(2), 2823–2831.

Pontianak Post. (2023, Januari 12). 16.750 pengguna aktif NAPZA di Kalbar. Pontianak Post. https://pontianakpost.jawapos.com/berita-kalbar/ diakses pada 12 Oktober 2025

Ramadhani, F. D., & Dasalinda, D. (2023). Penyesuaian Diri Korban Penyalahgunaan Napza dalam Menjalani Rehabilitasi Sosial di Sentra Handayani Jakarta. TERAPUTIK: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling, 7(2), 123–131. https://doi.org/10.26539/teraputik.721150

Romli, Edrisy, I. F. (2025). Efektivitas Rehabilitasi Sebagai Alternatif Pemidanaan Bagi Penyalahguna Narkoba di Indonesia. Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge (JIRK), 4(9), 6877-6886.

Salsabila, S., & Nastia, G. I. P. (2026). Krisis Kohesi Keluarga Di Era Kerentanan Napza. Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Akademik (JMIA), 3(2), 506–513. https://doi.org/10.61722/jmia.v3i2.9338

Saputra, V. E., Rosmanila, R., & Ependi, E. (2025). Rehabilitasi Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Penyalahgunaan Narkoba di Badan Narkotika Nasional (BNN) Provinsi Bengkulu. Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum, 3(4), 3734–3745. https://doi.org//10.61104/alz.v3i4.1937

Sugiarti, R. A. (2023). The problem with stigma: Identifying its impact on drug users and recommendation for interventions. Psikologia: Jurnal Pemikiran dan Penelitian Psikologi, 18(2), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.32734/psikologia.v18i2.11320

Sugiyono, S. (2013). Metode penelitian kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan R&D (19th edn). Alfabeta.

Ulfa, L., & Noor Justiatini, W. (2021). Peran Bimbingan Keagamaan dalam Rehabilitasi Pecandu Narkoba. Iktisyaf: Jurnal Ilmu Dakwah dan Tasawuf, 3(2), 55–77. https://doi.org/10.53401/iktsf.v3i2.67

Venerdi, A. J., & Edrisy, I. F. (2025). Pendekatan Hukum Pidana terhadap Pecandu Narkotika: Antara Pemidanaan dan Kewajiban Rehabilitasi. Journal Evidence of Law, 4(1), 300–309.

Yayasan Geratak Sambas. (2017). Akta pendirian Yayasan Geratak Sambas Nomor 16. Sambas: Notaris Urai Imamuddin, S.H., M.Kn

Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43–63). New York: Springer

Downloads

Published

2026-04-01