THE CONSISTENCY OF SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN ANSWERING MATHEMATICS QUESTIONS IN THE FINAL OF SEMESTER ASSESSMENT

Authors

  • Nursela Afiqa Universitas Borneo Tarakan
  • Suciati Suciati Universitas Borneo Tarakan
  • Ika Noviantari Universitas Borneo Tarakan
  • Arief Ertha Kusuma Universitas Borneo Tarakan https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6218-9457

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v16i2.91033

Keywords:

Final Assessment, Item Response Theory, Person-Fit

Abstract

The purpose of this study is 1) to analyse the response patterns of class XI high school students to the final Assessment, 2) to estimate the parameters of mathematics questions for the Class XI Final Assessment, and 3) to describe the consistency of class XI students' answers in the final Assessment. This research is the ex post facto type of research. Data collection techniques are carried out using documentation of high school students' responses in answering mathematics questions in the final odd semester assessment of 194 students. Student responses were analysed using the 2-PL (Logistic Parameter) model with the help of the R program. The item difficulty level was between -10.266 to 1.445, and the item differentiation index was -0.946 to 2.476. Most of the students' ability estimates were in the medium category with an interval of 1≤θ≤ 1. Based on the item parameters and students' abilities, it was found that 132 students were consistent in answering questions, and 62 students were inconsistent in answering questions, meaning that 62 students answered questions not based on their abilities. The results showed that the majority of students consistently answered the questions. This means that the scores obtained by students are in accordance with the students' abilities.

References

Alexandra, Gita., Ratu, N. (2018). Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis Siswa SMP Dengan Graded Response Models. Mosharafa, 7, 103–112.

Crocker, L., Crocker, L., Alglna, J., Staudt, M., Mercurio, S., Hintz, K., & Walker, R. A. (1986). I ntroduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory.

Fatkhudin, A., Surarso, B., & Subagio, A. (2016). Item Response Theory Model Empat Parameter Logistik Pada Computerized Adaptive Test. Jurnal Sistem Informasi Bisnis, 4(2), 121–129. https://doi.org/10.21456/vol4iss2pp121-129

Hambleton, R. K., & Jones, R. W. (1993). An NCME instructional module on comparison of classical test theory and item response theory and their applications to test development items: Instructional topics in educational measurement. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 12(3), 38–47. http://solo.bodleian.ox.ac.uk/OXVU1:TN_ericEJ471935

Hamdi, S., Kartowagiran, B., Istiyono, E., & Rahman, H. N. (2022). The ability of Junior High School mathematics teachers writing Higher Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) questions. Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 9(2), 115–123. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v9i2.55191

Jafar, R. A., Mansyur, M., & Pristiwaluyo, T. (2019). Konsistensi Peserta Dalam Menjawab Soal USBN IPA Tingkat SD Dengan Menggunakan Metode Person Fit. Universitas Negeri Makassar, 2. http://eprints.unm.ac.id/12885/

Karabatsos, G. (2003). Comparing The Aberrant Response Detection Performance of Thirty-Six Person-Fit Statistics. Applied Measurement in Education, 16(4). 277-298., 4, 147–173. doi:10.1207/S15324818AME1604_2

Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan. (2017). Panduan Penilaian oleh Pendidik dan Satuan Pendidikan Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Menengah, 43–45. http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/18051/1/1. Panduan Penilaian SMP - Cetakan Keempat 2017.pdf

Mahmudati, R. (2023). the Characteristics and Developing an Assessment Instrument of High Order Thinking Skill (Hots) Items With 4-D Models. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan IPA, 14(1), 107. https://doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v14i1.55497

Manfaat, B., & Anasha, Z. Z. (2013). Siswa Dengan Menggunakan Graded Response Models ( Grm ). Penguatan Peran Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika Untuk Indonesia Yang Lebih Baik, November, 978–979.

Manoppo, Y., & Mardapi, D. (2014). Analisis Metode Cheating Pada Tes Berskala Besar. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 18(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v18i1.2128

Mardhapi, D. (2015). Pengukuran & Penilaian Evaluasi pendidikan. Parama publishing.

Marjiastuti, K., & Faraz, N. J. (2015). Estimasi Kesalahan Pengukuran Perangkat Soal Uji Coba Ujian Nasional Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Sma Di Kabupaten Banjarnegara. Evaluasi Pendidikan, 3(1), 26–34. http://journal.student.uny.ac.id/ojs/index.php/jep ESTIMASI

Meijer, R. R. (1996). Person-Fit Research: An Introduction. In Applied Measurement in Education (Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp. 3–8). https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324818ame0901_2

Retnawati Heri. (2014). Teori Respon Butir dan Penerapannya. Nuha Medika.

Rosidah, N. A., Ramalis, T. R., & Suyana, I. (2018). Karakteristik Tes Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis ( Kbk ). Jurnal Inovasi Dan Pembelajaran Fisika, January 2018, 54–63.

Roza, M., Lufri, & Asrizal. (2020). Creation Of A Wordwall-Based Cognitive Assessment Tool For Static Electricity Materials. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Dan Ipa, 11(1), 13–21.

Seo, D. G., & Hao, S. (2016). Scale Comparability Between Nonaccommodated and Accommodated Forms of a Statewide High School Assessment: Using lz Person-Fit. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 34(3), 230–243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915596126

Stiggins, R., & Chappuis, J. (2012). Introduction to Student-Involved Assessment FOR Learning, An (2 nd). Addison Wesley. http://www.amazon.com/dp/0132563835

Suciati, Munadi, S., & Sugiman. (2022). Estimation of Test Item Parameters with Polytomous Item Response Using Partial Credit Model (PCM). Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Innovation in Education and Pedagogy (ICIEP 2020), 619(Iciep 2020), 232–237. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.211219.042

Sumintono, B., & Widhiarso, W. (2014). Aplikasi Rasch Model Untuk Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial (Issue November). Trim Komunikata Publishing House.

Tyas, E. H., Hamdu, G., & Haki Pranata, O. (2020). Analisis Soal Pilihan Ganda dengan Menggunakan Pemodelan RASCH untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Siswa dalam Mengurutkan Bilangan Pecahan di Sekolah Dasar. PEDADIDAKTIKA: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 7(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.17509/pedadidaktika.v7i2.24773

Yusron, E., Retnawati, H., & Rafi, I. (2020). Bagaimana hasil penyetaraan paket tes USBN pada mata pelajaran matematika dengan teori respon butir? Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.21831/jrpm.v7i1.31221

Downloads

Published

2025-05-15

Issue

Section

Articles