IMPLEMENTATION OF STEM-BASED DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION TO IMPROVE SCIENCE LITERACY OF JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN PADANGSIDIMPUAN CITY

Authors

  • Nurhidaya Fithriyah Nasution Institut Pendidikan Tappanuli Selatan
  • Febriani Hastini Nasution Institut Pendidikan Tapanuli Selatan
  • Muhammad Syahril Syahril Harahap Institut Pendidikan Tapanuli Selatan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v17i2.99085

Keywords:

digital transformation, STEM, science literacy, science education, Padangsidimpuan

Abstract

The low level of science literacy among junior high school students, especially in regions such as Padangsidimpuan City, remains a major obstacle to delivering education that meets the demands of the 21st century. Digital transformation, combined with the STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics) approach, is considered a promising solution by integrating technology into instruction and enhancing students"™ critical thinking abilities. This study aims to: (1) assess the science literacy levels of junior high school students in Padangsidimpuan City before and after the implementation of the instructional intervention; (2) describe the implementation of science learning designed around digital transformation and the STEM approach; and (3) evaluate its effectiveness in improving science literacy. A mixed-methods approach was adopted, utilizing a quasi-experimental design with a nonequivalent control group. Data were collected through science literacy assessments, classroom observations, student questionnaires, and interviews with both students and teachers. Quantitative data were analyzed using t-tests and normalized gain (N-Gain), while qualitative data were interpreted through thematic analysis. The findings demonstrate a significant increase in science literacy among students in the experimental group compared to those in the control group, with an average N-Gain of 0.62, categorized as moderate to high. The results suggest that science instruction incorporating digital transformation and the STEM approach is effective in improving students"™ science literacy and promoting active participation in the learning process. Moreover, this study produced a contextual digital learning module and offered policy recommendations to support science and technology-oriented education.

References

OECD, “Education at a Glance 2019,†Educ. a Glance OECD Indic., 2019, doi: 10.1787/f8d7880d-en.

Kemendikbudristek, “Laporan Kinerja Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Tahun 2023,†Lap. Kinerja Direktorat Jenderal Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan Tahun 2023, vol. 1, no. 1, 2023.

P. Brown and R. Bybee, “Can STEM Save the World?,†Midwest J. Educ., Dec. 2024, doi: 10.69670/mje.1.2.6.

S. Anwar, M. Menekse, S. Guzey, and L. A. Bryan, “The effectiveness of an integrated STEM curriculum unit on middle school students’ life science learning,†J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 59, no. 7, pp. 1204–1234, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.1002/tea.21756.

J. K. Bell et al., “Student Outcomes Differ Based on Length of a Courseâ€based Undergraduate Research Experience (CURE),†FASEB J., vol. 36, no. S1, May 2022, doi: 10.1096/fasebj.2022.36.s1.r5756.

S. P. Lestari, F. Adhim, R. S. D. Gita, and N. C. E. Setiawan, “Analysis of a STEM Based Flipped Classroom Learning Model for Enhancing Metacognition and Student Learning Outcomes in Buffer Solution Topic,†J. Pendidik. Sains Indones., vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 721–736, Jul. 2025, doi: 10.24815/JPSI.V13I3.45891.

A. H. Muchtar and L. Ding, “Integrated STEM Education in Indonesia: What Do Science Teachers Know and Implement?,†J. Pendidik. Sains Indones., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 232–246, 2024, doi: 10.24815/jpsi.v12i1.35588.

A. Permanasari, B. Rubini, and O. F. Nugroho, “STEM Education in Indonesia: Science Teachersâ€TM and Studentsâ€TM Perspectives,†J. Innov. Educ. Cult. Res., vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 7–16, 2021, doi: 10.46843/jiecr.v2i1.24.

F. B. Sole, “Implementation of STEM-Based Learning for Strengthening Science Literacy of Students,†J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 7, no. SpecialIssue, pp. 382–388, Dec. 2021, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v7ispecialissue.1266.

S. Sulistiyowati, A. Abdurrahman, and T. Jalmo, “The Effect of STEM-Based Worksheet on Students’ Science Literacy,†Tadris J. Kegur. dan Ilmu Tarb., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 89–96, Jun. 2018, doi: 10.24042/tadris.v3i1.2141.

L. A. Khairani, E. Djulia, and W. Bunawan, “Interactive Multimedia Development Based on STEM in Improving Science Learning Outcomes,†Randwick Int. Educ. Linguist. Sci. J., vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 428–435, Jun. 2023, doi: 10.47175/rielsj.v4i2.719.

A. H. Shaik, M. Prabhu, S. M. Hussain, and K. K. Poloju, “An Interactive Design Tool for Assessing Student understanding in Digital Environments,†SHS Web Conf., vol. 156, p. 09004, 2023, doi: 10.1051/shsconf/202315609004.

R. Tariq, B. M. Aponte Babines, J. Ramirez, I. Alvarez-Icaza, and F. Naseer, “Computational thinking in STEM education: current state-of-the-art and future research directions,†Front. Comput. Sci., vol. 6, 2024, doi: 10.3389/fcomp.2024.1480404.

E. P. Lestari, W. Wasis, and T. Purnomo, “Science Learning Materials in Integrated PBL Scientific Literacy Model to Improve Problem Solving Ability of Junior High School Students,†IJORER Int. J. Recent Educ. Res., vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 464–477, Jul. 2022, doi: 10.46245/ijorer.v3i4.230.

G. Agra, N. S. Formiga, P. S. de Oliveira, M. M. L. Costa, M. D. G. M. Fernandes, and M. M. L. da Nóbrega, “Analysis of the concept of Meaningful Learning in light of the Ausubel’s Theory,†Rev. Bras. Enferm., vol. 72, no. 1, pp. 248–255, 2019, doi: 10.1590/0034-7167-2017-0691.

D. H. Jonassen, “Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking. Columbus, OH: Merrill/Prentice-Hall. Jonassen,†no. 1996, pp. 0–1, 1996, [Online]. Available: https://dl.acm.org/doi/abs/10.5555/237789

S. Scagliola et al., “Cross disciplinary overtures with interview data: Integrating digital practices and tools in the scholarly workflow,†pp. 126–136, 2020, doi: 10.3384/ecp2020172015.

Z. Wu, “Understanding Teachers’ Cross-Disciplinary Collaboration for STEAM Education: Building a Digital Community of Practice,†Think. Ski. Creat., 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101178.

S. Kamila and I. Maryani, “Efekivitas Pembelajaran STEM-PJBL dalam Meningkatkan Regulasi Diri Dan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah IPA Kelas 5 Sekolah Dasar,†Renjana Pendidik. Dasar, vol. 5, no. 2, 2025.

K. Ding et al., “Effect of short-term intensive design-based STEM learning on executive function: an fNIRS study of the left-behind children,†Cereb. Cortex, vol. 34, no. 8, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhae311.

P. Mweene and G. Muzaza, “Implementation of Interactive Learning Media on Chemical Materials,†J. Educ. Verkenn., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 8–13, Nov. 2020, doi: 10.48173/jev.v1i1.24.

Suhartono, Cari, Sarwanto, E. Susanti, and S. Fatmawati, “Transdisciplinary STEM education based on Among’s philosophy implementation against engineering problem-solving and motivation: The case monochromatic light, simple laser project,†Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 1–16, 2023, doi: 10.29333/EJMSTE/13811.

S. R. Muzana, Jumadi, I. Wilujeng, B. E. Yanto, and A. A. Mustamin, “E-STEM project-based learning in teaching science to increase ICT literacy and problem solving,†Int. J. Eval. Res. Educ., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 1386–1394, 2021, doi: 10.11591/IJERE.V10I4.21942.

M. Masruroh, S. Eraku, and M. R. Pambudi, “Challenges and Transformations: Building Teacher Professionalism in the Digital Era for Superior Education,†J. Penelit. Pendidik. IPA, vol. 10, no. SpecialIssue, pp. 620–626, Aug. 2024, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v10ispecialissue.9142.

S. L. Mohamad, “Learning Environment and Academic Engagement in Science of Junior High School Students,†Int. J. Res. Publ., vol. 141, no. 1, Jan. 2024, doi: 10.47119/ijrp1001411120246031.

Published

2026-04-06