Collaborative Management for Public Facilities and Biogas on the Village Land
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26418/uniplan.v2i1.45886Keywords:
Social institution, Bengkok, Common goods, Village land, Co-managementAbstract
A village land is an asset belonging to the village or common goods, not belonging to individuals, foundations, Institution or companies so that it must be used for the benefit of the village or the administration of government. This research identified the constraints on the use of Bengkok as a village land, exploring the format of collaborative management (co-management) in the utilization of Biogas installation and public facilities such as: composting, chopper, water tank, play group, meeting room and warehouse. The research method was taken with in-depth interview and observation to obtain the data through all member of the farmer groups, the religious and community leaders, and village government staff. The results indicated that the utilization and management of the village land by farmer groups were not yet optimal. The cow's milk production was still quite small, volatile, and tended to decline. The decreased milk production resulted in the loss of other processed products such as soap, candy and crackers from milk ingredients. Other impacts included the closing of the business opportunities for fertilizer from livestock manure, and the passive supply of household gas obtained from the biogas installation. This research initiated the need for the role of 5 stakeholders, namely Ungaran Regency government, village government, private parties, social institution, and the local communities in order to collaborate on Biogas and public facilities management. The social institutions were formed to repair or improve the Biogas management and water supply for all facilities on the village land.
References
Armitage, D., Berkes, F., Doubleday, N. (2007), “Adaptive Co-Management: Collaboration, Learning, and Multi-level Governanceâ€. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver
Borrini-Feyerabend, G., Farvar, M.T., Nguinguiri, J.C., Ndangang, V. (2000) “Co-management of Natural Resources: Organizing Negotiation and Learning by Doingâ€, Kasparek., Heidelberg Germany
(http://nrm.massey.ac.nz/changelinks/cmnr.html.)
Berkes, F., George, P., Preston, R., (1991) “Co-management: the evolution of the theory and practice of joint administration of living resourcesâ€, Alternatives 18 (2), 12–18
Berkes, F (2009) “Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learningâ€, Journal of Environmental Management 90, 1692–1702
Bzn, B. Ter Haar (1983).â€Asas-Asas dan Susunan Hukum Adatâ€, Pradnya Paramita, Jakarta, Indonesia
Be´ne´, C., Neiland, A.E. (2004) “Empowerment reform, yes. But empowerment of whom? Fisheries decentralization reforms in developing countries: a critical assessment with specific reference to poverty reductionâ€. Aquatic Resources, Culture and Development 1, 35–49
Carlssona., Lars, Berkes. Fikret (2005) “Co-management: concepts and methodological implicationsâ€, Journal of Environmental Management 75, 65–76
CIFOR (2008) “Adaptive Collaborative Management Can Help us Cope with Climate Changeâ€, Info brief No. 13. Center for International Forestry Research. 4 pp
Khator, Renu., (2009) “Bureaucracy and the Environmental Crisis: A Comparative Perspective in Bureaucracy and Administrationâ€, Farazman, Ali (Edt). Taylor and Francis Group, New York
Kofinas, G., (2002) “Community contributions to ecological monitoring: knowledge co-production in the U.Sâ€, Canada Arctic Borderlands. In: Krupnik, I., Jolly, D (Eds.), The Earth is Faster Now. Arctic Research Consortium of the United States, pp. 54–91. Fairbanks
Maurer, Jean-Luc. (1994) “Pamong Desa or Raja Desa dalam Leadership in Java: Gentle Hints, Authoritarian Rule†(by Antlöv, H. & Cederroth. S) Routledge & Curzon, pp 105-106
Mutimukuru, T., Kozanyi, W., Nyrenda, R. (2006) “Catalyzing collaborative monitoring process in joint forest management situations: the Mafungautsi forest case, Zimbabweâ€. Society and Natural Resources 19, 209–224
Olsson, P., Folke, C., Hahn, T., (2004). “Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Swedenâ€, Ecology and Society 9 (4), 2
Available from: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss4/art2/.
Rusdianto, Akhmad Zakky (2015) “Analisis Yuridis terhadap Pengelolaan Tanah Bengkok Di Desa Sepanyul, Kecamatan Gudo Kabupaten Jombangâ€, Skripsi, Fakultas Hukum Universitas Negeri Semarang
Ramelan, Eman (1999) Keberadaan Tanah Bengkok atau Ganjaran Dalam Perspektif Hukum di Indonesia, Jurnal Yuridika, Vol 14.
Singleton, S., (1998) Constructing Cooperation: The Evolution of Institutions of Co-management, University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor
Sanoff, Henry (2000) “Community Participation Methods in Design and Planningâ€, John Wiley and Sons Incorporate Canada.
The World Bank, (1999) “Report from the International Workshop on Community-Based natural Resource Management (CBNRM)â€, Washington, DC, 10–14 May 1998. URL:http://www.worldbank.org/wbi/conatrem/
Tjiptabudy, Jantje and La Ode Angga (2020) “Customary Rights Regulations in the Eti Village of West Seram Regency Maluku Provinceâ€, International Journal of Scientific & Technology Research, Vol. 9 (01)
Tobing, Ary Anggraito (2009) “Eksistensi Tanah Bengkok Setelah Berubahnya Pemerintahan Desa Menjadi Kelurahan Di Kota Salatigaâ€, Tesis, Program Pasca Sarjana Universitas Diponegoro Semarang.
Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria (Agrarian Law number: 5 / 1960).
Undang-Undang Desa (Village Law number: 6 / 2014)
Wicaksono, Anggit & Dwiyana, Achmad (2016) “Pengelolaan Tanah Bengkok sebagai Hak Asal Usul Setelah Berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 6/2014 tentang Desa: Studi Kasus Di Kabupaten Kudusâ€, Jurnal Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muria Kudus.
Wollenberg, E., Iwan, R., Limberg, G., Moeliono, M., Rhee, S., Sudana, M. (2007) “Facilitating cooperation during times of chaos: Spontaneous orders and muddling through in Malinau District, Indonesiaâ€, Ecology and Society 12 (1), 3.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 UNIPLAN: Journal of Urban and Regional Planning
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with "UNIPLAN: Journal of Urban and Regional Planning" agree to the following terms:- Authors transfer the copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.. that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access)
