Pengetahuan Mahasiswa Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia Terkait Pemanfaatan Perplexity AI dalam Membantu Pembelajaran di Perguruan Tinggi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26418/tjole.v1i1.79359Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan mengungkapkan persepsi mahasiswa terhadap pemanfaatan Perplexity AI dalam membantu proses pembelajaran di perguruan tinggi. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode kualitatif-deksriptif. Data dalam penelitian ini berupa tanggapan terkait penggunaan Perplexity AI dalam membantu proses pembelajaran yang diperoleh dengan teknik wawancara semi terstruktur kepada 10 responden responden penelitian yakni mahasiswa S-1, Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia, FKIP, Universitas Tanjungpura, semester 4, angkatan 2022 yang telah dan masih menggunakan Perplexity AI dalam proses pembelajaran. Data dalam penelitian ini dianalisis dengan menggunakan teknik analisis data tematik untuk menemukan beberapa tema persepsi terhadap penggunaan Perplexity AI. Hasil penelitian menemukan beberapa tema persepsi yaitu persepsi kegunaan, kemudahan, dan niat perilaku. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian dapat disimpulkan bahwa Perplexity AI mempunyai pengaruh besar dalam proses pembelajaran di perguruan tinggi. Temuan pada penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa dalam konteks keguaan Perplexity merupakan AI berbasis Chat bot yang dapat membantu proses pembelajaran karena sifatnya yang mampu mencari informasi yang cepat dan akurat. Perplexity AI juga dapat membantu mahasiswa dalam menavigasi database dan mencari informasi secara efisien.References
Apple, M. (2013). Teachers and texts: A political economy of class and gender relations in education. In Teachers and Texts: A Political Economy of Class and Gender Relations in Education (p. 259). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315021027
Barredo Arrieta, A., DÃaz-RodrÃguez, N., Del Ser, J., Bennetot, A., Tabik, S., Barbado González, A., Garcia, S., Gil-Lopez, S., Molina, D., Benjamins, V. R., Chatila, R., & Herrera, F. (2019). Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): Concepts, Taxonomies, Opportunities and Challenges toward Responsible AI. Information Fusion, 58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2019.12.012
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
Chang, J., & Lu, X. (2019). The Study on Students’ Participation in Personalized Learning Under the Background of Artificial Intelligence (p. 558). https://doi.org/10.1109/ITME.2019.00131
Chassignol, M., Khoroshavin, A., Klimova, A., & Bilyatdinova, A. (2018). Artificial Intelligence trends in education: A narrative overview. Procedia Computer Science, 136, 16–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.08.233
Conklin, T., & Hartman, N. (2014). Conklin, T. A. & Hartman, N. S. (2014). Appreciative inquiry and autonomy-supportive classes in business education: A semi-longitudinal study of AI in the classroom. Journal of Experiential Education, 37(3), 285 –309. Journal of Experiential Education, 37, 285–309.
Dehouche, N. (2021). Plagiarism in the age of massive Generative Pre-trained Transformers (GPT-3): “The best time to act was yesterday. The next best time is now.†Ethics in Science and Environmental Politics, 21. https://doi.org/10.3354/esep00195
Du Boulay, B. (2016). Artificial Intelligence as an Effective Classroom Assistant. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 31, 76–81. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2016.93
Fereday, J., & Muir-Cochrane, E. (2006). Demonstrating Rigor Using Thematic Analysis: A Hybrid Approach of Inductive and Deductive Coding and Theme Development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690600500107
Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Education. Promise and Implications for Teaching and Learning.
Hutson, J., Jeevanjee, T., Graaf, V., Lively, J., Weber, J., Weir, G., Arnone, K., Carnes, G., Vosevich, K., Plate, D., Leary, M., & Edele, S. (2022). Artificial Intelligence and the Disruption of Higher Education: Strategies for Integrations across Disciplines. Creative Education, 13, 3953–3980. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2022.1312253
Johnson, L. (2022). Failure to Disrupt: Why Technology Alone Can’t Transform Education. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 16, 101–103. https://doi.org/10.22329/jtl.v16i1.7033
Khare, K., Stewart, B., & Khare, A. (2018). Artificial Intelligence and the Student Experience: An Institutional Perspective. IAFOR Journal of Education, 6, 63–78. https://doi.org/10.22492/ije.6.3.04
Knopf, A., & Rose, E. (2000). Postman, N. (1995). The End of Education: Redefining the Value of School.
Kumar, E. (2013). Natural Language Processing. I.K. International Publishing House Pvt. Limited. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=FpUBFNFuKWgC
Kumar, R., Eaton, S., Mindzak, M., & Morrison, R. (2023). Academic Integrity and Artificial Intelligence: An Overview (pp. 1–14). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-079-7_153-1
Laura, R., & McPherson, A. (2009). The technologisation of education: Philosophical reflections on being too plugged in. International Journal of Childrens Spirituality, 14, 289–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/13644360903086554
Mikropoulos, T., & Natsis, A. (2011). Educational virtual environments: A ten-year review of empirical research (1999–2009). Computers & Education, 56, 769–780. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.020
Muzammil, A. R., Mariyadi, M., Asfar, D. A., Shidqi, M. Z., Astama, R. A. E., Muhammad, R. D., & Mahadi, C. A. (2023). Persepsi Mahasiswa S-1 Semester Kedua Terhadap Pemanfaatan Photomath dalam Pemecahan Persoalan Matematika pada Proses Perkuliahan. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 12(4), 761–772. https://doi.org/10.58230/27454312.285
Nawi, A. (2020). PENEROKAAN AWAL TERHADAP ISU DAN IMPAK PENGGUNAAN TEKNOLOGI KECERDASAN BUATAN TERHADAP KEHIDUPAN MANUSIA [EARLY EXPLORATION TOWARDS ISSUES AND IMPACT THE USE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE TECHNOLOGY TOWARDS HUMAN BEINGS] Citation- Aliff Nawi. (2019). Penerokaan awal terhadap isu dan impak penggunaan teknologi kecerdasan buatan terhadap kehidupan manusia. Asian Journal of Civilizational Studies (AJOCS), 1(4), 24-33.
Nowell, L. S. (2017). Thematic Analysis: Striving to Meet the Trustworthiness Criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
Permana, P. T. H., & Astawa, N. L. P. N. S. P. (2020). Artificial Intelligence dalam Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris. JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(3), 687–692.
Pokrivcakova, S. (2019). Preparing teachers for the application of AI-powered technologies in foreign language education. Journal of Language and Cultural Education, Query date: 2024-03-20 11:58:57. https://doi.org/10.2478/jolace-2019-0025
Rus, V., D’Mello, S., Hu, X., & Graesser, A. (2013). Recent Advances in Conversational Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Ai Magazine, 34, 42–54. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v34i3.2485
Sasvari, P. (2024). Furcsa kifejezések miatt buknak meg a hamis kutatási dokumentumok. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.29171.71206
Susnjak, T. (2022). ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity? https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2212.09292
Sutton, H. (2019). Minimize online cheating through proctoring, consequences. Recruiting & Retaining Adult Learners, 21, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/nsr.30434
Wollny, S., Schneider, J., Di Mitri, D., Weidlich, J., Rittberger, M., & Drachsler, H. (2021). Are We There Yet? - A Systematic Literature Review on Chatbots in Education. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 4, 654924. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2021.654924
Zhai, X., Fang, Q., Dong, Y., Wei, Z., Yuan, J., Cacciolatti, L., & Yang, Y. (2018). The effects of biofeedback-based stimulated recall on self-regulated online learning: A gender and cognitive taxonomy perspective. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 34. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12284
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Tri Mardika Wati, Gunawan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.id that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).