KAJIAN SOSIOPRAGMATIK IMPERATIF DALAM DEBAT PILKADA DKI JAKARTA TAHUN 2017

Abstract

Abstract

The problem in this research is the form and meaning of imperative in the second round of election debate of DKI Jakarta in 2017 and the text material substance, in order to describe the problem. The benefit of the research is to increase the insight regarding the form and meaning of imperative in the second round of election debate of DKI Jakarta in 2017.The method in this research is descriptive method with qualitative form. Technique of presenting data analysis that is informal technique.Based on the results of this research data analysis resulted in the conclusion that there are four imperative forms include; (1) the imperative form of demand, (2) the permit imperative form, (3) the imperative form of invitation, (4) the imperative form of the order. This study succeeded in collecting twelve imperative meanings, 3 meanings of imperative command, 15 imperative meanings of invitation, 28 imperative meaning of madness, 10 eating imperative appeal, 6 imperative meaning of surrender, 7 imperative meaning of demand, 5 imperative meanings permitting, 7 meaning imperative hope, 1 imperative meaning ngelulu, 1 meaning mperatif ban, 10 meaning imperative insistence, and 8 meaning imperative plea.

Keywords: Impratif meaning, Sociopragmatic, Debate