Transformasi Narapidana melalui Kewirausahaan Agribisnis: Membangun Keberlanjutan Usaha dan Mengurangi Residivisme
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26418/jsea.v14i1.89145Keywords:
agribusiness entrepreneurship, business sustanaibility, recidivism reduction, technical skill, entrepreneurial skillsAbstract
This study is based on capacity-building theory, a key component of change theory, which emphasizes the importance of developing individual and organizational capacity to achieve sustainable change. In the context of correctional institutions (LAPAS), this theory helps explain how empowerment programs can improve inmates' ability to prepare for life after their sentence, with the aim of reducing recidivism through sustainable entrepreneurial skills. This study focuses on evaluating the impact of an agricultural entrepreneurship promotion program in Class IIA Cikarang Correctional Facility (LAPAS) on business sustainability and recidivism rates. The study used partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) to develop two analytical models. Model 1 covers all respondents, while Model 2 covers inmates with no entrepreneurial experience or training. The main variables in this study include technical skills, entrepreneurial skills, social support, education and knowledge, motivation, business sustainability, and recidivism rates. The results of Model 1 show that technical skills, entrepreneurial skills, social support, and education have a positive impact on business sustainability, which contributes to reducing recidivism rates. Motivations and attitudes affect enterprise sustainability but have no direct effect on recidivism rates. Model 2 shows that technical skills and business sustainability significantly reduce recidivism rates, while entrepreneurial skills and social support act as mediators. The study concludes that agricultural business programs are very important for the economic sustainability and reduction of recidivism rates of prisoners after release, and recommends more intensive agricultural training and improved social support.References
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behaviour. Prentice- Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Al-Qudah, A. A., Al-Okaily, M., & Alqudah, H. (2022). The relationship between social entrepreneurship and sustainable development from economic growth perspective: 15 ‘RCEP’ countries. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 12(1), 44–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2021.1880219
Anderson, A. A. (2020). The Community Builder’s Approach to Theory of Change, a practical guide to theory development, The Aspen Institute
Bae, T. J., Qian, S., Miao, C., & Fiet, J. O. (2014). The Relationship between Entrepreneurship Education and Entrepreneurial Intentions: A Meta–Analytic Review. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(2), 217–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12095
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. . W H Freeman/Times Books/ Henry Holt & Co.
Banha, F., Coelho, L. S., & Flores, A. (2022). Entrepreneurship Education: A Systematic Literature Review and Identification of an Existing Gap in the Field. Education Sciences, 12(5), 336. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12050336
Baum, J. R., & Locke, E. A. (2004). The Relationship of Entrepreneurial Traits, Skill, and Motivation to Subsequent Venture Growth. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(4), 587–598. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.587
Bullough, A., Renko, M., & Myatt, T. (2014). Danger Zone Entrepreneurs: The Importance of Resilience and Self–Efficacy for Entrepreneurial Intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(3), 473–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12006
Chin, W. W. (2013). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling, in Marcoulides, G.A. (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research (3rd ed.). Psychology Press.
Ciptono, W. S., Anggadwita, G., & Indarti, N. (2023). Examining prison entrepreneurship programs, self-efficacy and entrepreneurial resilience as drivers for prisoners' entrepreneurial intentions. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 29(2), 408-432.
Coleman, J. S. (1990). Foundations of social theory. Harvard university press.
Connell, J. P., & Kubisch, A. C. (1998). Applying a theory of change approach to the evaluation of comprehensive community initiatives: A conversation with practitioners. In K. Fulbright-Anderson, A. C. Kubisch, & J. P. Connell (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives: Theory, measurement, and analysis (pp. 47–66). The Aspen Institute.
Crick, D., & Crick, J. M. (2016). Coopetition at the sports marketing/entrepreneurship interface. Marketing Intelligence & Planning, 34(2), 169–187. https://doi.org/10.1108/MIP-09-2014-0174
Daspit, J. J., Fox, C. J., & Findley, S. K. (2023). Entrepreneurial mindset: An integrated definition, a review of current insights, and directions for future research. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(1), 12–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1907583
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Springer Science & Business Media.
Gielnik, M. M., Uy, M. A., Funken, R., & Bischoff, K. M. (2017). Boosting and sustaining passion: A long-term perspective on the effects of entrepreneurship training. Journal of Business Venturing, 32(3), 334–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2017.02.003
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-0203
Hall, L. L. (2015). Correctional education and recidivism: Toward a tool for reduction. Journal of Correctional Education (1974-), 66(2), 4-29.
Harraka, M. (2002). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, by Robert D. Putnam. Journal of Catholic Education, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.15365/joce.0602122013
Hartono, J., & Abdillah, W. (2014). Konsep Dan Aplikasi (Partial Least Square) Untuk Penelitian Empiris. Bpfe Ugm.
Hisrich, R. D., & Peters, M. P. (2004). Entrepreneurship (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Kementerian Hukum dan Hak Asasi Manusia Republik Indonesia. (2022). Statistik Pemasyarakatan 2022. Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan
Latessa, E. J., Lovins, B., & Lux, J. (2018). The Ohio Risk Assessment System. In Handbook of Recidivism Risk/Needs Assessment Tools (pp. 147–163). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119184256.ch7
Lichtenstein, G. A., & Lyons, T. S. (2001). The Entrepreneurial Development System: Transforming Business Talent and Community Economies. Economic Development Quarterly, 15(1), 3–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124240101500101
Loeffler, C. E., & Nagin, D. S. (2022). The Impact of Incarceration on Recidivism. Annual Review of Criminology, 5(1), 133–152. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-030920-112506
McGee, J. E., Peterson, M., Mueller, S. L., & Sequeira, J. M. (2009). Entrepreneurial Self–Efficacy: Refining the Measure. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33(4), 965–988. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00304.x
Nur, A. V., & Nguyen, H. (2023). Prison work and vocational programs: A systematic review and analysis of moderators of program success. Justice Quarterly, 40(1), 129-158.
Patzelt, H., Williams, T. A., & Shepherd, D. A. (2014). Overcoming the Walls That Constrain Us: The Role of Entrepreneurship Education Programs in Prison. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 13(4), 587–620. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2013.0094
Petersilia, J. (2009). When Prisoners Come HomeParole and Prisoner Reentry. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195160864.001.0001
Pidduck, R. J., Clark, D. R., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2023). Entrepreneurial mindset: Dispositional beliefs, opportunity beliefs, and entrepreneurial behavior. Journal of Small Business Management, 61(1), 45–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472778.2021.1907582
Rae, D., & Carswell, M. (2000). Using a lifeâ€story approach in researching entrepreneurial learning: the development of a conceptual model and its implications in the design of learning experiences. Education + Training, 42(4/5), 220–228. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400910010373660
Renko, M., Bullough, A., & Saeed, S. (2021). How do resilience and self-efficacy relate to entrepreneurial intentions in countries with varying degrees of fragility? A six-country study. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 39(2), 130–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242620960456
Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (Vol. 2). John Wiley & Sons.
Shane, S. A. (2003). A general theory of entrepreneurship: The individual-opportunity nexus. Edward Elgar Publishing.
Sutter, C., Bruton, G. D., & Chen, J. (2019). Entrepreneurship as a solution to extreme poverty: A review and future research directions. Journal of business venturing, 34(1), 197-214.
United Nation Development Group. (2016). UNDAF COMPANION GUIDANCE: CAPACITY DEVELOPMENT. UNDP.
Wu, L., Jiang, S., Wang, X., Yu, L., Wang, Y., & Pan, H. (2022). Entrepreneurship Education and Entrepreneurial Intentions of College Students: The Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy and the Moderating Role of Entrepreneurial Competition Experience. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.727826
Xu, H., Zhang, C., & Huang, Y. (2023). Social trust, social capital, and subjective well-being of rural residents: micro-empirical evidence based on the Chinese General Social Survey (CGSS). Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01532-1
Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment Theory. In Handbook of Community Psychology (pp. 43–63). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-4193-6_2
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Agus Fernando
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
