Analysis of Barriers and Strategies to Enhance Community Participation in Utilizing Centralized Domestic Wastewater Treatment Systems in Jambi City, Indonesia

Authors

  • Dicky Nurfandi Putra
  • Heni Fitriani
  • Febrian Hadinata

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26418/jts.v25i4.100916

Keywords:

Strategy, WWTPs, Ability To Pay, MSMIP, Inhibiting factors, Low-income households.

Abstract

The development of Centralized Wastewater Treatment Plants (WWTPs) in Indonesia often faces negative public responses, leading to low community willingness to connect to the system. Through the Metropolitan Sanitation Management Investment Project (MSMIP), the government has initiated construction of WWTPs in several regions, including Jambi City, to address domestic wastewater issues. This study applies a mixed-methods approach to assess existing sanitation conditions and identify key factors inhibiting public participation across technical, economic, cognitive, perceptual, and institutional dimensions, analyzed using the Relative Importance Index (RII). Results show that 68.9% of households discharge wastewater without prior treatment, and 3.9% release both toilet and non-toilet waste directly into rivers. The community’s Average Ability to Pay (ATP) is IDR 103,000/month, considerably higher than the tariff of IDR 22,500/month, indicating that affordability is not a primary constraint. Instead, the main inhibiting factors include concerns about damage to the building during household connection installation, perceived increases in monthly maintenance costs, and the absence of clear local regulations. Limited public knowledge, assumptions that wastewater management is a government responsibility, and negative perceptions during construction further reduce willingness to participate. The study recommends strengthening regulatory frameworks, ensuring maintenance cost coverage, providing subsidies for low-income households, and enhancing outreach through collaboration with local academic institutions and community self-help groups.

References

Adzillah, W. N., Sembiring, E., & Handajani, M. (2016). Pemilihan Alternatif Pengolahan Limbah Cair Domestik Dengan Menggunakan Metode Dependence and Driving Power (Ddpa) Dan Analytic Network Process (Anp) (Studi Kasus: Kota Depok). Jurnal Tehnik Lingkungan, 22(2), 82–91. https://doi.org/10.5614/j.tl.2016.22.2.9

Baladina, N., Toiba, H., Hanani, N., Suhartini, S., & Widarjono, A. (2024). Do income levels affect the food consumption pattern of households? Evidence from Indonesia. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 14(9), 695–711. https://doi.org/10.55493/5002.v14i9.5158

Brzusek, A., Widomski, M. K., & Musz-pomorska, A. (2022). Socio-Economic Aspects of Centralized Wastewater System for Rural Settlement under Conditions of Eastern Poland.

Cecilia, S., Murayama, T., Nishikizawa, S., & Suwanteep, K. (2023). Stakeholder evaluation of sustainability in a community ‑ led wastewater treatment facility in Jakarta , Indonesia. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03056-9

Cecilia, S., Murayama, T., Nishikizawa, S., & Suwanteep, K. (2024). Preferences and valuation of small-scale wastewater treatment system maintenance using discrete choice method: Case of community-managed system in Jakarta, Indonesia. Journal of Environmental Management, 371(November), 123115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123115

Cristina, G., Lima, L., Vila-tojo, S., Correa-chica, A., Lema, J., & Sabucedo, J. (n.d.). “ Who Cares ?”: The Acceptance of Decentralized Wastewater Systems in Regions without Water Problems. 2020.

Dinas PUPR Kota Jambi, U. I. (2025). 5.2 Daftar Sambungan Rumah.pdf.

Eales, K., Blackett, I., Siregar, R., & Febriani, E. (2013). Review of Community-Managed Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems in Indonesia. Review of Community-Managed Decentralized Wastewater Treatment Systems in Indonesia, June. https://doi.org/10.1596/17751

Eko Prasetyo, D., Fitriani, H., & Susanti, B. (2020). Analysis of Domestic Wastewater Management Systems in Low Income Residential Areas. Sriwijaya Journal of Environment, 5(2), 92–102. https://doi.org/10.22135/sje.2020.5.2.92-102

Hidayat, M. R. S., & Setiyawan, A. S. (2024). Analisis Keberlanjutan Sistem Pengelolaan Air Limbah Domestik Terpusat Skala Permukiman. Jurnal Serambi Engineering, IX(3), 2020–2024. https://jse.serambimekkah.id/index.php/jse/article/view/421%0Ahttps://jse.serambimekkah.id/index.php/jse/article/download/421/311

Hurriyah Mujahidah, Utomo S. Putro, K. A. (2024). Social Perception and Support of a Public Sanitation Service in Bandung: Community Insights and Engagement Strategies. 7, 170–185. https://doi.org/10.31014/aior.1991.07.02.496

Marfi, S., Barchia, M. F., Yurike, Y., Brata, B., & Santoso, U. (2024). Kajian Manfaat Dan Willingness to Pay Masyarakat Terhadap Layanan Instalasi Pengolahan Lumpur Tinja (IPLT) Di Kota Bintuhan. Naturalis: Jurnal Penelitian Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam Dan Lingkungan, 13(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.31186/naturalis.13.1.33399

McKenna, M. L., McAtee, S., Bryan, P. E., Jeun, R., Ward, T., Kraus, J., Bottazzi, M. E., Hotez, P. J., Flowers, C. C., & Mejia, R. (2017). Human Intestinal Parasite Burden and Poor Sanitation in Rural Alabama. The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 97(5), 1623–1628. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.17-0396

Msaki, G. L., Njau, K. N., Treydte, A. C., & Lyimo, T. (2022). Social knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions on wastewater treatment, technologies, and reuse in Tanzania. Water Reuse, 12(2), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.2166/wrd.2022.096

Ramadhan, D., Indah, S., & Helard, D. (2023). Strategi Pengelolaan Air Limbah Domestik di Kawasan Permukiman Hulu Sungai Kelurahan Hutaimbaru Kota Padangsidimpuan. Jurnal Kesehatan Lingkungan Indonesia, 22(3), 274–281. https://doi.org/10.14710/jkli.22.3.274-281

Rasyidah, U. M. (2019). Diare sebagai Konsekuensi Buruknya Sanitasi Lingkungan. KELUWIH: Jurnal Kesehatan Dan Kedokteran, 1(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.24123/kesdok.v1i1.2485

Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup No.11 Tahun 2025, 22 Peraturan Menteri Lingkungan Hidup No 11 Tahun 2025 ___ (2025). https://doi.org/10.1088/1751-8113/44/8/085201

Riztu, S., Pradita, N. A., Sufra, R., Adriansyah, E., Luter, P. T. Z., Suzana, A., Satria, A. W., & Sanjaya, A. (2024). Penurunan Kadar COD Air Limbah Domestik Menggunakan Fly Ash d engan Metode Adsorpsi. 24(3), 2570–2574. https://doi.org/10.33087/jiubj.v24i3.5677

Rooshdi, R. R. R. M., Majid, M. Z. A., Sahamir, S. R., & Ismail, N. A. A. (2018). Relative importance index of sustainable design and construction activities criteria for green highway. Chemical Engineering Transactions, 63(2007), 151–156. https://doi.org/10.3303/CET1863026

Sabia, G., De Gisi, S., & Farina, R. (2016). Implementing a composite indicator approach for prioritizing activated sludge-based wastewater treatment plants at large spatial scale. Ecological Indicators, 71, 1–18.

Siswati, M., Syafrudin, S., & Sriyana, S. (2017). Uji Kriteria Manajemen dalam Pengelolaan Air Limbah Domestik Terpusat. Media Komunikasi Teknik Sipil, 23(1), 77. https://doi.org/10.14710/mkts.v23i1.12780

Starkl, M., Brunner, N., Das, S., & Singh, A. (2022). Sustainability

Assessment for Wastewater Treatment Systems in Developing Countries. Water (Switzerland), 14(2), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14020241

Sururi, M. R., Dirgawati, M., Wiliana, W., & Widiawati, N. (2023). Performance Assessment of Constructed Communal. 23, 1–14.

Taweesan, A., Kanabkaew, T., Surinkul, N., & Polprasert, C. (2023). Convenient solutions to inconvenient truth: Domestic wastewater management-based approaches to sustainable development goal no. 6. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 18(December 2022), 100255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2023.100255

Downloads

Published

2025-12-08

Issue

Section

Vol 25, No 4 (2025): Vol 25, No 4 (2025): JURNAL TEKNIK SIPIL EDISI NOVEMBER 2025