Evaluating the Performance of HEC-RAS in Simulating Strongly Nonlinear and Dispersive Wave Propagation

Authors

  • Fiqih Rahmanto Department of Civil Engineering, Parahyangan Catholic University
  • Albert Wicaksono Department of Civil Engineering, Parahyangan Catholic University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26418/jts.v25i2.92675

Keywords:

wave propagation, nonlinear, dispersive, HEC-RAS

Abstract

Understanding wave propagation, particularly in shallow water where nonlinear and dispersive effects become prominent, is essential for achieving accurate hydraulic modeling. HEC-RAS is a widely utilized computational tool in engineering applications for simulating open channel flows, predominantly under the assumption of hydrostatic pressure. This study investigates the capability of HEC-RAS to simulate wave propagation under conditions characterized by strong nonlinearity and dispersion. To conduct this evaluation, three benchmark scenarios were modeled: (1) solitary wave propagation in a flat, frictionless channel, (2) interaction of a solitary wave with a submerged bar, based on experimental data, and (3) regular wave propagation. Each case was simulated using HEC-RAS and the results were compared against analytical solutions or experimental observations. The findings indicate that HEC-RAS exhibits notable limitations in accurately representing wave phenomena dominated by nonlinear and dispersive effects. These limitations are primarily attributed to the shallow water equations implemented in the model, which omit non-hydrostatic pressure components. Such components are critical for maintaining wave shape and amplitude, particularly over variable bathymetry. In conclusion, while HEC-RAS remains a robust and reliable tool for conventional flow modeling, it is not well-suited for scenarios involving strongly nonlinear and dispersive wave propagation. For such cases, alternative modeling approaches that incorporate non-hydrostatic pressure effects are recommended to ensure greater simulation accuracy.

References

Adytia, D., Husrin, S., & Latifah, A. L. (2019). Dissipation of Solitary Wave Due To Mangrove Forest: A Numerical Study by Using Non-Dispersive Wave Model. Ilmu Kelautan: Indonesian Journal of Marine Sciences, 24(1), 41 – 50.

Akers, B., & Nicholls, D. P. (2021). Wilton Ripples in Weakly Nonlinear Dispersive Models of Water Waves: Existence And Analyticity of Solution Branches. Water Waves, 3(1), 25-47.

Beji, S., & Battjes, J. A. (1993). Experimental Investigation of Wave Propagation Over A Bar. Coastal engineering, 19(1-2), 151-162.

Brunner, G. W. (2016). HEC-RAS, River Analysis System Hydraulic Reference Manual. USACE.

Bush, S. T., Dresback, K. M., Szpilka, C. M., & Kolar, R. L. (2022). Use of 1D Unsteady HEC-RAS in a Coupled System for Compound Flood Modeling: North Carolina Case Study. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 10, 306.

do Carmo, J. S. A. (2016). Nonlinear and Dispersive Wave Effects in Coastal Processes. Journal of Integrated Coastal Zone Management, 16(3), 343 – 355.

Ghimire, E., & Sharma, S. (2021). Flood damage assessment in HAZUS using various resolution of data and one-dimensional and two-dimensional HEC-RAS depth grids. Natural Hazards Review, 22(1), 04020054.

Ginting, B. M., & Ginting, H. (2020). Extension of Artificial Viscosity Technique for Solving 2D European Journal of Mechanics / B Fluids, 80, 92 – 111.

Horritt M, Bates P (2002) Evaluation of 1D and 2D Numerical Models for Predicting River Flood Inundation. J Hydrol, 268(1–4), 87–99.

Jun, S. M., Song, J. H., Choi, S. K., Lee, K. D., & Kang, M. S. (2018). Combined 1D/2D Inundation Simulation of Riverside Farmland using HEC-RAS. Journal of the Korean Society of Agricultural Engineers, 60(5), 135-147.

Lai, W., & Khan, A. A. (2018). Numerical Solution of the Saint-Venant Equations by An Efficient Hybrid Finite-volume/Finite-difference Method. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 30, 189-202.

Madsen, O. S., & Mei, C. C. (1969). The transformation of a solitary wave over an uneven bottom. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 39(4), 781-791.

Mahmood, P., Syed, Z., Haider, S., Saleem, M. W., & Rashid, M. (2024). Comparing the Performance of the New HEC-RAS Model Utilizing Different Modeling Techniques: A Case Study of the Tous Dam Break. Open Access Library Journal, 11, e12217.

Ogras, S., & Onen, F. (2020). “Flood Analysis with HEC-RAS: A Case Study of Tigris River. Hindawi, 2020, 6131982.

Ohyama, T., Kioka, W., & Tada, A. (1995). Applicability of Numerical Models to Nonlinear Dispersive Waves. Coastal Engineering, 24, 297 – 313.

Pathan, A. I., & Agnihotri, P. G. (2021). Application of New HEC-RAS version 5 for 1D Hydrodynamic Flood Modeling with Special Reference through Geospatial Techniques: A Case Of River Purna At Navsari, Gujarat, India. Modeling Earth Systems and Environment, 7, 1133-1144.

Pinos, J., Timbe, L., & Timbe, E. (2019). Evaluation of 1D Hydraulic Models for the Simulation of Mountain Fluvial Floods: A Case Study of the Santa Bárbara River in Ecuador. Water Practice & Technology, 14(2), 341-354.

Samal, P., Swain, P. C., & Samantaray, S. (2025). Flood analysis using HEC-RAS 1D model for the delta of Brahmani river, Odisha, India. Natural Hazards, 1-26.

Saprykina, Y. (2020). The Influence of Wave Nonlinearity on Cross-Shore Sediment Transport in Coastal Zone: Experimental Investigations. Applied Sciences, 10, 4087.

ShahiriParsa, A., Noori, M., Heydari, M., & Rashidi, M. (2016). Floodplain zoning simulation by using HEC-RAS and CCHE2D models in the Sungai Maka river. Air, Soil and Water Research, 9, ASWR-S36089.

Shustikova, I., Domeneghetti, A., Neal, J. C., Bates, P., & Castellarin, A. (2019). Comparing 2D Capabilities of HEC-RAS and LISFLOOD-FP on Complex Topography. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 64(14), 1769 – 1782.

Venutelli, M. (2002). Stability and Accuracy of Weighted Four-Point Implicit Finite Difference Schemes for Open Channel Flow. Journal of hydraulic engineering, 128(3), 281-288.

Young, C. -C., Wu, C. H., Liu, W. -C., & Kuo, J. -K. (2009). A Higher-order Non-hydrostatic σ Model for Simulating Non-linear Refraction-diffraction of Water Waves. Coastal Engineering, 56, 919 – 930.

Zainalfikry, M. K., Ab Ghani, A., Zakaria, N. A., & Chan, N. W. (2019). HEC-RAS One-Dimensional Hydrodynamic Modelling for Recent Major Flood Events in Pahang River. In AWAM International Conference on Civil Engineering (pp. 1099-1115). Cham: Springer International Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2025-05-15

Issue

Section

Vol 25, No 2 (2025): Vol 25, No 2 (2025): JURNAL TEKNIK SIPIL EDISI MEI 2025