Kebijakan Pembatasan Sosial Berkala: Prediksi Sikap Masyarakat terhadap Telemedis Selama Pandemi COVID-19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26418/justin.v10i4.49526Keywords:
Telemedis, Studi Cross-Sectional, Ordered Logistic Regression, Korelasional, Pembatasan Social Berkala, Adaptasi Kebiasaan BaruAbstract
Kebijakan pemerintah untuk pembatasan sosial berkala dan Adaptasi kebiasaan Baru (AKB), mendorong masyarakat untuk menyesuaikan perilaku dengan menyesuaikan diri mematuhi protokol kesehatan yang ditetapkan sejak hadirnya pandemi COVID-19 di Indonesia. Dalam sektor Kesehatan, penyesuaian dilakukan dengan gencarnya pelayanan kesehatan masyarakat secara daring. Telemedis dapat memberikan pelayanan perawatan rutin tanpa risiko tertular Covid-19 karena dilakukan secara daring. Meskipun Telemedis menawarkan banyak manfaat potensial, namun mendorong penggunaannya pada masyarakat merupakan sebuah tantangan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengevaluasi sikap terhadap Telemedis selama masa pembatasan sosial dan Adaptasi kebiasaan Baru (AKB) pandemi COVID-19 di Indonesia, kemudian menilai kesediaan masyarakat untuk menggunakan layanan tersebut di masa depan, dan mengevaluasi sejauh mana responden telah berubah pikiran tentang layanan ini. Penelitian ini menggunakan dua pendekatan analisis statistik. Pendekatan pertama adalah studi cross-sectional, deskriptif, dan korelasional dilakukan di antara orang dewasa berusia diatas 19 tahun (> 20 tahun) menggunakan jaringan media sosial (N = 203). Kemudian pendekatan kedua adalah Ordered Logistic Regression Models pada dua butir kuesioner untuk variabel dependen, yaitu memprediksi kesediaan menggunakan telemedis di masa depan dan memprediksi perubahan pikiran tentang telemedis. Data dikumpulkan menggunakan kuesioner online yang secara eksplisit dirancang untuk mengukur sikap terhadap telemedis. Enam puluh empat persen responden setuju dan sangat setuju bahwa mereka perlu menggunakan telemedis selama masa kebijakan pembatasan sosial dan Adaptasi Kebiasaan Baru (AKB) pendemi COVID-19. Namun, meskipun terdapat ketersediaan telemedis selama pembatasan pada masa pandemi COVID-19, tetapi 46,92% responden cenderung tetap lebih suka pergi ke klinik atau rumah sakit. Sebanyak 24,64% responden ragu untuk pergi ke klinik atau rumah sakit, dan 28,44% responden enggan untuk pergi ke klinik atau rumah sakit. Hal ini menjadikan telemedis di Indonesia belum dianggap kebutuhan, namun masih dianggap jalan keluar pertama yang bisa dilakukan di masa pembatasan sosial berkala.
References
Tim BPS Covid-19 Statistical Task Force, Hasil Survei Perilaku Masyarakat Di Masa Pandemi Covid-19 (7-14 September 2020), vol. 19, no. September. 2020.
S. A. Soenarso and Handoyo, “Survei Markplus: Masyarakat enggan mengunjungi rumah sakit sejak pandemi Covid-19,†kontan.co.id, 2020. https://nasional.kontan.co.id/news/survei-markplus-masyarakat-enggan-mengunjungi-rumah-sakit-sejak-covid-19 (accessed Sep. 17, 2021).
E. Laurenza, M. Quintano, F. Schiavone, and D. Vrontis, “The effect of digital technologies adoption in healthcare industry: a case based analysis,†Bus. Process Manag. J., vol. 24, no. 5, pp. 1124–1144, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.1108/BPMJ-04-2017-0084.
M. Esposito, A. Minutolo, R. Megna, M. Forastiere, M. Magliulo, and G. De Pietro, “A smart mobile, self-configuring, context-aware architecture for personal health monitoring,†Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., vol. 67, pp. 136–156, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2017.09.019.
Y. Zhao, Q. Ni, and R. Zhou, “What factors influence the mobile health service adoption? A meta-analysis and the moderating role of age,†Int. J. Inf. Manage., vol. 43, pp. 342–350, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2017.08.006.
D. H. Jaffe, L. Lee, S. Huynh, and T. P. Haskell, “Health Inequalities in the Use of Telehealth in the United States in the Lens of COVID-19,†Popul. Health Manag., vol. 23, no. 5, pp. 368–377, Aug. 2020, doi: 10.1089/pop.2020.0186.
S. Sadegh, P. Saadat, M. M. Sepehri, and V. Assadi, “A framework for m-health service development and success evaluation,†Int. J. Med. Inform., vol. 112, pp. 123–130, Apr. 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.01.003.
A. Beratarrechea, A. G. Lee, J. M. Willner, E. Jahangir, A. Ciapponi, and A. Rubinstein, “The impact of mobile health interventions on chronic disease outcomes in developing countries: a systematic review,†Telemed. J. E. Health., vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 75–82, Jan. 2014, doi: 10.1089/tmj.2012.0328.
L. Wallis, P. Blessing, M. Dalwai, and S. Do Shin, “Integrating mHealth at point of care in low- and middle-income settings: the system perspective.,†Glob. Health Action, vol. 10, no. sup3, p. 1327686, Jun. 2017, doi: 10.1080/16549716.2017.1327686.
A. Doshi, Y. Platt, J. R. Dressen, B. K. Mathews, and J. C. Siy, “Keep calm and log on: Telemedicine for COVID-19 pandemic response,†J. Hosp. Med., vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 302–304, 2020, doi: 10.12788/jhm.3419.
J. Vidal-Alaball et al., “Telemedicine in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic,†Aten. primaria, vol. 52, no. 6, pp. 418–422, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.aprim.2020.04.003.
B. A. Oktavira, “Aturan tentang Konsultasi Dokter Jarak Jauh (Telemedicine),†Klinik Hukumonline, Oct. 25, 2019. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/detail/ulasan/lt5db2b3d5e618b/aturan-tentang-konsultasi-dokter-jarak-jauh-itelemedicine-i/ (accessed Sep. 17, 2021).
E. Whaibeh, H. Mahmoud, and H. Naal, “Telemental Health in the Context of a Pandemic: the COVID-19 Experience,†Curr. Treat. options psychiatry, pp. 1–5, Apr. 2020, doi: 10.1007/s40501-020-00210-2.
R. A. Machado, N. L. de Souza, R. M. Oliveira, H. Martelli Júnior, and P. R. F. Bonan, “Social media and telemedicine for oral diagnosis and counselling in the COVID-19 era.,†Oral oncology, vol. 105. p. 104685, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2020.104685.
S. Reicher, T. Sela, and O. Toren, “Using Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Attitudes of Adult Health Care Consumers in Israel,†Front. Public Heal., vol. 9, no. May, pp. 1–11, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.653553.
A. Miyawaki, T. Tabuchi, M. K. Ong, and Y. Tsugawa, “Age and Social Disparities in the Use of Telemedicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic in Japan: Cross-sectional Study.,†J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 23, no. 7, p. e27982, Jul. 2021, doi: 10.2196/27982.
R. A. Neher, R. Dyrdak, V. Druelle, E. B. Hodcroft, and J. Albert, “Potential impact of seasonal forcing on a SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.,†Swiss Med. Wkly., vol. 150, p. w20224, Mar. 2020, doi: 10.4414/smw.2020.20224.
E. K. Stokes et al., “Coronavirus Disease 2019 Case Surveillance - United States, January 22-May 30, 2020.,†MMWR. Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep., vol. 69, no. 24, pp. 759–765, Jun. 2020, doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6924e2.
D.-Q. Pham, S. A. Golub, C. C. Breuner, and Y. N. Evans, “The Impact of Telehealth on Clinical Education in Adolescent Medicine During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Positive Preliminary Findings,†Front. Pediatr., vol. 9, p. 210, 2021, doi: 10.3389/fped.2021.642279.
S. Heath, “60% of Patients Interested in Using Digital Communication Tools,†Jul. 09, 2020. https://patientengagementhit.com/news/60-of-patients-interested-in-using-digital-communication-tools (accessed Sep. 17, 2021).
M. Hilbert, “Digital gender divide or technologically empowered women in developing countries? A typical case of lies, damned lies, and statistics,†Womens. Stud. Int. Forum, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 479–489, 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2011.07.001.
B. Gawronski and F. Strack, Eds., Cognitive Consistency: A Fundamental Principle in Social Cognition - Google Books. New York: The Guiford Press, 2012.
D. AlbarracÃn and R. S. Wyer Jr., “The cognitive impact of past behavior: Influences on beliefs, attitudes, and future behavioral decisions.,†Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, vol. 79, no. 1. American Psychological Association, US, pp. 5–22, 2000, doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.1.5.
J. A. Ouellette and W. Wood, “Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior.,†Psychological Bulletin, vol. 124, no. 1. American Psychological Association, US, pp. 54–74, 1998, doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 JUSTIN (Jurnal Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the copyright in his paper and agrees to publish his paper to JUSTIN by giving the rights to the first publication of his paper which is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, namely the Similar International 4.0 license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
This is a human-readable summary of (and not a substitute for) the license. Disclaimer.
You are free to:Share "” copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt "” remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution "” You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial "” You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike "” If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions "” You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
