Persepsi Dosen Pascasarjana Universitas Swasta terhadap ChatGPT dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pembalajaran
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26418/justin.v11i3.67023Keywords:
dosen pascasarjana, chatgpt, mutu pembelajaranAbstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui persepsi dosen pascasarjana tentang penggunaan ChatGPT dalam meningkatkan mutu pembelajaran. Masalah penelitian berfokus pada pemahaman bagaimana dosen pascasarjana memandang efektivitas dan keterbatasan teknologi ChatGPT.Penelitian ini menggunakan penelitian kualitatif yang dijabarkan secara deskriptif dengan pendekatan studi kasus.ChatGPT sebagai solusi yang efektif untuk membuat materi ajar atau dapat digunakan sebagai bahan konfirmasi awal. ChatGPT bisa meningkat mutu pembelajaran jika dilengkapi dengan daya kritis dan profesionalitas. Sedang yang skeptis terhadap penggunaan ChatGPT dalam dunia pendidikan. Mereka mengkhawatirkan kemudahan yang diberikan oleh ChatGPT bisa menghilangkan humanisme dan bisa berpotensi mematikan daya kritis dosen dan mahasiswa. penggunaan teknologi ChatGPT yang efektif untuk kualitas pembelajaran mencakup menjaga pola pikir kritis, memverifikasi informasi dari sumber terpercaya, menetapkan tujuan pembelajaran yang jelas, mendorong keterlibatan siswa, dan terus mengevaluasi kinerja dari ChatGPT akan memaksimalkan manfaat teknologi ChatGPT untuk menjaga mutu pembelajaran.
References
A. M. A. Ausat, “The Application of Technology in the Age of Covid-19 and Its Effects on Performance,†Apollo, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 14–22, 2023.
Kraugusteeliana, E. Surjati, A. M. A. Ausat, S. A. Pramono, and H. K. Prabu, “A Literature Review on the Application of Technology During Covid-19 and Its Relationship to Performance,†international J. Artif.
Intell. Res., vol. 6, no. 1, 2022.
D. Abdulhak, I.& Darmawan, Teknologi Pendidikan. Bandung: Rosdakarya, 2015.
D. Lase, “Education and Industrial Revolution 4.0,†vol. 10, pp. 48–62, 2019.
S. Ghavifekr et al., “ICT Integration In Education: Incorporation for Teaching & Learning Improvement,†Malaysian Online J. Educ. Technol., vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 24–48, 2014.
N. Iqbal and H. Ahmed, “Exploring Teachers ’ Attitudes towards Using Chat GPT,†no. February, 2023.
S. Sok, “Opinion: Benefits and Risks of ChatGPT in Education,†https://cambodianess.com, 2023.
J. Deng and Y. Lin, “The Benefits and Challenges of ChatGPT : An Overview,†vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 81–83, 2022.
G. Siemens, “Why We’re Obsessed With the Mind-Blowing ChatGPT AI Chatbot,†unisa.edu.au, 2023.
I. H. Indriana, E. Krisnanik, A. Muliawati, and H. Nurramdhani, “Jurnal Pendidikan dan Konseling Utilisation of ChatGPT’s Artificcial Intelligence in Improving the Quality and Productivity of Lecturers ’ Work,†vol. 5, pp. 3245–3249, 2023.
C. Glen and ChatGPT, “ChatGPT Employability Study Skills and Curriculum Development,†2023.
J. De Winter, “Can ChatGPT pass high school exams on English language comprehension?,†2023.
A. Muna, A. Ausat, and H. K. Azzaakiyyah, “Is ChatGPT Dangerous for Lecturer Profession? An In-depth Analysis,†J. Pendidik. dan Konseling, vol. 5, pp. 3226–3229, 2023.
M. R. King, “A Conversation on Artificial Intelligence , Chatbots , and Plagiarism in Higher Education,†Cell. Mol. Bioeng., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 1–2, 2023, doi: 10.1007/s12195-022-00754-8.
A. Thurzo, M. Strunga, J. Surovkov, and K. I. Afrashtehfar, “education sciences Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Dental Education : A Review and Guide for Curriculum Update,†2023
A. J. Willems, R. C. Cup, and O. Office, “ChatGPT at universities – The least of our concerns,†vol. 2023, no. January, pp. 1–8, 2023.
D. Ruby, “ChatGPT Statistics for 2023 (New Data + GPT-4 Facts),†www.demandsage.com, 2023.
A. Zen, R. Kusumastuti, D. Metris, S. S. Gadzali, and A. M. A. Ausat, “Implications of Entrepreneurship Education as a Field of Study for Advancing Research and Practice.,†J. Educ., vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 11441–11453, 2023.
M. Firat, “How chat GPT can transform autodidactic experiences and open education?,†2023.
M. Tashtoush, Y. Wardat, F. Aloufi, and O. Taani, “The effect of a training program based on (TIMSS) to developing the levels of habits of mind and mathematical reasoning skills among preservice mathematics teachers. .,†EURASIA J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ., vol. 8, no. 11, 2022.
S. Arikunto, “Metodologi Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Proposal,†2017, 2002.
A. Tlili et al., “What if the devil is my guardian angel: ChatGPT as a case study of using chatbots in education,†Smart Learn. Environ., vol. 10, no. 1, 2023.
A. Faiz and I. Kurniawaty, “Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Tantangan Penggunaan ChatGPT dalam Pendidikan Ditinjau dari Sudut Pandang Moral,†J. Ilmu Pendidik., vol. 5, 2023.
B. D. Lund and T. Wang, “Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries?,†Library Hi Tech News. 2023.
J. Qadir, “Engineering Education in the Era of ChatGPT: Promise and Pitfalls of Generative AI for Education,†TechRxiv, 2022.
X. Zhai, “ChatGPT User Experience : Implications for Education,†2022.
A. Muna, A. Ausat, B. Massang, M. Efendi, and Y. Riady, “Can Chat GPT Replace the Role of the Teacher in the Classroom : A Fundamental Analysis,†vol. 05, no. 04, pp. 16100–16106, 2023.
J. Shen-Berro, “New York City Schools blocked ChatGPT. Here’s what other large districts are doing.,†Chalkbeat., 2023. [Online].Available: https://www.chalkbeat.org/2023/1/6/23543039/chatgpt-school-districts-ban-block-artificial-intelligence-open-ai
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 JUSTIN (Jurnal Sistem dan Teknologi Informasi)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The author owns the copyright in his paper and agrees to publish his paper to JUSTIN by giving the rights to the first publication of his paper which is simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, namely the Similar International 4.0 license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
This is a human-readable summary of (and not a substitute for) the license. Disclaimer.
You are free to:Share "” copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
Adapt "” remix, transform, and build upon the material
The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
Attribution "” You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
NonCommercial "” You may not use the material for commercial purposes.
ShareAlike "” If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same license as the original.
No additional restrictions "” You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
