PENGARUH MODEL PEMBELAJARAN ADI BERBANTUAN E-SCAFFOLDING BERKONTEKS MULTI REPRESENTASI TERHADAP HOTS DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN AWAL BERBEDA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26418/jvip.v17i3.81866Keywords:
Argument-Driven Inquiry Scaffolding (ADI-S), Multi Representasi, HOTS, Kemampuan Awal.Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh model pembelajaran argument-driven inquiry berbantuan e-scaffolding berkonteks multi representasi terhadap HOTS ditinjau dari kemampuan awal siswa. Sampel penelitian adalah siswa SMA Negeri 2 Malang kelas XI IPA yang berjumlah 102 siswa. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah quasi experiment dengan desain penelitian faktorial 3 x 2. Pengumpulan data menggunakan instrumen tes HOTS berjumlah 13 butir soal berbentuk pilihan ganda dengan empat alternatif jawaban. Teknik analisis data menggunakan two way ANCOVA. Hasil penelitian adalah 1) Kemampuan HOTS siswa yang dibelajarkan menggunakan model ADI-S berkonteks multi representasi lebih tinggi dibanding siswa dibelajarkan menggunakan model ADI berkonteks multi representasi, dan ADI; 2) Terdapat perbedaan hasil HOTS antara siswa dengan kemampuan awal berbeda yang dibelajarkan menggunakan model ADI-S berkonteks multi representasi, ADI berkonteks multi representasi, dan ADI; 3) Tidak terdapat interaksi antara model pembelajaran dengan kemampuan awal terhadap kemampuan HOTS siswa.References
Aithal, P. S. (2015) ‘Concept of Ideal Teaching & Learning Model in Higher Education’, International Journal of Management, IT & Engineering, 5(8), pp. 75–88.
Amin, A. M., & Corebima, A. D. (2016) ‘Analisis Persepsi Dosen terhadap Strategi Pembelajaran Reading, Questioning, and Answering (RQA) dan Argument-Driven Inquiry (ADI) pada Program Studi Pendidikan Biologi di Kota Makassar.’, Prosiding Seminar Nasional II 2016, 3(1), pp. 333–347.
Bao, L. et al. (2009) ‘Physics: Learning and scientific reasoning’, Science, 323(5914), pp. 586–587. doi: 10.1126/science.1167740.
Belland, B. R. (2017) Instructional Scaffolding in STEM Education, Instructional Scaffolding in STEM Education. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-02565-0.
Birjandi, P. (2014) ‘A comparative Analysis of Teachers’ Scaffolding Practices’, International Journal of Language and Linguistics, 2(3), p. 154. doi: 10.11648/j.ijll.20140203.14.
Bucat, B. & Mocerino, M. (2009) ‘Learning at the sub-micro level: Structural representations. In Multiple representations in chemical education’, Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, pp. 11–29.
Clark, D., Sampson, V., Stegmann, K., Marttunen, M., Kollar, I., Janssen, J., ... & Laurinen, L. (2009) ‘Scaffolding scientific argumentation between multiple students in online learning environments to support the development of 21st century skills.’, In The national academies’ board on science education workshop on exploring the intersection of science education and 21st century skills, pp. 1–44.
Davidowitz, B., Chittleborough, G., & Murray, E. (2010) ‘Student-generated submicro diagrams: A useful tool for teaching and learning chemical equations and stoichiometry.’, Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 11(3), pp. 154–164.
Dede, C. (2009) ‘Comparing Frameworks for " 21 st Century Skills "’, pp. 1–16.
Hand, B. and Choi, A. (2010) ‘Examining the impact of student use of multiple modal representations in constructing arguments in organic chemistry laboratory classes’, Research in Science Education, 40(1), pp. 29–44. doi: 10.1007/s11165-009-9155-8.
Hannafin, M. J. and Land, S. M. (2000) ‘Technology and student-centered learning in higher education: Issues and practices’, Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 12(1), pp. 3–30. doi: 10.1007/BF03032712.
Harta, J., Rasuh, N. T. and Seriang, A. (2020) ‘Using HOTS-Based Chemistry National Exam Questions to Map the Analytical Abilities of Senior High School Students’, Journal of Science Learning, 3(3), pp. 143–148. doi: 10.17509/jsl.v3i3.22387.
Iriany, Liliasari., & A. S. (2009) ‘Inkuiri Laboratorium Berbasis Teknologi Informasi pada Konsep Laju Reaksi untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Generik Sains dan Berpikir Kreatif Siswa SMA.’, Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 3(2).
Johnstone, A. H. (2009) Multiple representations in chemical education.
Jumaat, N. F. and Tasir, Z. (2016) ‘A framework of metacognitive scaffolding in learning authoring system through Facebook’, Journal of Educational Computing Research, 54(5), pp. 619–659. doi: 10.1177/0735633115627824.
Li, W. S. S. and Arshad, M. Y. (2014) ‘Application of multiple representation levels in redox reactions among tenth grade chemistry teachers’, Journal of Turkish Science Education, 11(3), pp. 35–52. doi: 10.12973/tused.10117a.
Liu, Y. C., & Hung, Y. Y. (2016) ‘Self-efficacy as the moderator: Exploring driving factors of perceived social support for mainland Chinese students in Taiwan.’, Computers in Human Behavior, 64, pp. 455–462.
Meutia, I., Sitompul, S. S. and Mahmuda, D. (2018) ‘Penerapan Model Inquiry Learning untuk Meningkatkan Higher Order Thinking Skills Materi Momentum dan Impuls’, Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 7(10), pp. 1–10. Available at: https://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/view/29027%0Ahttps://jurnal.untan.ac.id/index.php/jpdpb/article/download/29027/75676578749.
Nurdiansyah (2018) Perbandingan Pendekatan Inkuiri Terbimbing dan Verifikasi Bermakna Terhadap Pemahaman Konseptual dan Keterampilan Proses Sains ditinjau dari Kemampuan Berpikir Ilmiah. Malang: Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.
Nurhayati, N. and Angraeni, L. (2017) ‘Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Tingkat Tinggi Mahasiswa (Higher Order Thinking) dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Konsep Optika melalui Model Problem Based Learning’, Jurnal Penelitian & Pengembangan Pendidikan Fisika, 3(2), pp. 119–126. doi: 10.21009/1.03201.
Osman, K., Hiong, L. C. and Vebrianto, R. (2013) ‘21st Century Biology: An Interdisciplinary Approach of Biology, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics Education’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 102(Ifee 2012), pp. 188–194. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.732.
Pallant, A. and Lee, H. S. (2015) ‘Constructing Scientific Arguments Using Evidence from Dynamic Computational Climate Models’, Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2–3), pp. 378–395. doi: 10.1007/s10956-014-9499-3.
Partnership for 21 st Century Skills (2015) ‘Partnership for 21St Century Skills-Core Content Integration’, Ohio Department of Education, p. 1. Available at: www.P21.org.
Prediger, S. and Krägeloh, N. (2015) ‘Low achieving eighth graders learn to crack word problems: a design research project for aligning a strategic scaffolding tool to students’ mental processes’, ZDM - Mathematics Education, 47(6), pp. 947–962. doi: 10.1007/s11858-015-0702-7.
Pucangan, A. A. (2017) Studi kuantitatif dan kualitatif kemampuan pemecahan masalah melalui scaffolding konseptual dalam problem based learning/AA SG. Noviana Aryani P. Universitas Negeri Malang.
Rahayu, S. (2018) Meningkatkan Keterampilan Metakognisi Siswa Melalui Metaconitive Scaffolding pada Materi Termodinamika. Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.
Rimadani, E. (2015) Penguasaan Konsep dan Penalaran Ilmiah Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Guided iInquiry Berstrategi Scaffolding pada Materi Suhu dan Kalor di SMA Negeri 1 Krian.
Robinson, K. (2011) Out of our minds: Learning to be creative, American Psychologist. doi: 10.1037/0003-066x.52.7.745.a.
Sagala, P. N. and Andriani, A. (2019) ‘Development of Higher-Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Questions of Probability Theory Subject Based on Bloom’s Taxonomy’, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1188(1), pp. 1–14. doi: 10.1088/1742-6596/1188/1/012025.
Seifert, K. and Sutton, R. (no date) ‘Educational Psychology’.
Sirhan, G. (2007) ‘Sirhan / TÜFED-TUSED / 4(2) 2007 2 Learning Difficulties in Chemistry: An Overview’, Turkish Science Education, 4(2), pp. 2–20. Available at: http://www.tused.org.
Suryati, S. (2013) ‘Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran LC Dipadu Diagram Alir terhadap Kualitas Proses dan Hasil Belajar Kimia Siswa’, Hydrogen: Jurnal Kependidikan Kimia, 1(1), p. 14. doi: 10.33394/hjkk.v1i1.574.
Suyono, & Hariyanto, S. (2014) Belajar dan Pembelajaran Teori dan Konsep Dasar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Talanquer, V. (2011) ‘Macro, submicro, and symbolic: The many faces of the chemistry “tripletâ€â€™, International Journal of Science Education, 33(2), pp. 179–195. doi: 10.1080/09500690903386435.
Thalib, S. B. (2017) Psikologi pendidikan berbasis analisis empiris aplikatif. Prenada Media.
Turiman, P. et al. (2012) ‘Fostering the 21st Century Skills through Scientific Literacy and Science Process Skills’, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 59, pp. 110–116. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.253.
Walker, J. P. et al. (2011) ‘Argument-Driven Inquiry in Undergraduate Chemistry Labs: The Impact on Students’ Conceptual Understanding, Argument Skills, and Attitudes Toward Science’, Journal of College Science Teaching, 41(4), pp. 74–81.
Widarti, H., Sigit, D. and Irianti, D. (2020) ‘Pengaruh kemampuan awal terhadap kemampuan interkoneksi multi representasi siswa pada materi larutan penyangga’, J-PEK (Jurnal Pembelajaran Kimia), 5(1), pp. 40–46. doi: 10.17977/um026v5i12020p040.
Yee Mei Heong et al. (2011) ‘The Level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skillsamong Technical Education Students’, International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 1(2).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Visi Ilmu Pendidikan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All articles published Open Access will be immediately and permanently free for everyone to read and download. Under the CC-BY-NC license, Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This license permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium for non-commercial purposes, provided the original work and source is properly cited.
