RENCANA LANSKAP WISATA EDUKASI KEBUN ANGGREK DI TAMAN KYAI LANGGENG KOTA MAGELANG
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26418/lantang.v7i1.35002Keywords:
Rencana Tapak, Taman Anggrek, Lanskap WisataAbstract
Taman Kyai Langgeng (TKL) yang berlokasi di Kota Magelang dikenal sebagai salah satu tujuan wisata andalan di Propinsi Jawa Tengah. Jumlah pengunjung ke TKL sejak 2010 mengalami fluktuasi dan cenderung menurun sejak tahun 2015. TKL memiliki sebuah kebun anggrek yang berfungsi sebagai area propagasi dan diusulkan menjadi sebuah wahana wisata baru sebagai upaya meningkatkan jumlah pengunjung. Tujuan studi ini yaitu menghasilkan sebuah rencana lanskap untuk taman anggrek dengan pendekatan wisata edukatif. Proses perencanaan meliputi persiapan, pengumpulan data, analisis, sintesis, konsep, dan pembuatan rencana tapak. Analisis tapak menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif dan spasial terhadap komponen lanskap fisik dan bio-fisik serta elemen wisata. Wisata edukatif-rekreatif terkait anggrek menjadi konsep dasar perencanaan dimana rancangan fisik tapak menggunakan anatomi anggrek sebagai tema utama. Pengembangan rencana tapak berdasarkan rencana ruang yang terbagi atas ruang wisata utama dan pendukung wisata, dimana ruang wisata utama sebagai atraksi andalan terbagi atas ruang kreasi anggrek, taman tematik anggrek, hutan anggrek dan outlet anggrek. Dalam studi ini, kemiringan tapak dan prasyarat tumbuh anggrek menjadi faktor penting yang mempengaruhi penyusunan rencana tapak.
LANDSCAPE PLAN FOR ORCHID GARDEN EDU-TOURISM OF KYAI LANGGENG PARK IN MAGELANG CITY
Kyai Langgeng Park in Magelang City is known as one of the primary tourist destinations in Central Java Province. The visitor number of the park, however, had been fluctuated since 2010 and tended to decline since 2015. This park has an orchid garden, which initially functioned as a propagation area. This area was proposed to be improved into a touristic object as an attempt to attract more visitors. The main objective of this study, therefore, is to produce a site plan for the garden by considering its physical landscape and educational tourism elements. The planning process included preparation, data inventory, analysis, synthesis, concept, and site planning. The site analysis applied a descriptive and spatial analysis of the biophysical landscape and tourism components. By assigning the educative and recreative tourism as the fundamental concept for the site development with orchid as the core theme, the site plan was arranged based on the spatial plan of main touristic and supporting zones. The main touristic zone as the major attraction is divided into three areas: orchid-based creativity, orchid theme garden, orchid jungle, and orchid outlet. It is apparent that the site"™s slope and the prerequisite condition to support the optimum orchid"™s growth have become significant factors that influenced the site plan considerably.
References
Anggara, A. (2008). Merawat Anggrek. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya.
Booth, K. (1983). Basic Elements for Landscape Architecture Design. Illionis: Waveland Press.
BPS Kota Magelang. (2019). Statistik Daerah Kota Magelang 2019. Magelang: BPS.
BPS Kota Magelang. (2018). Statistik Daerah Kota Magelang 2017. Magelang: BPS.
[CTC] Canadian Tourism Commission. (2004). Defin-ing Tomorrow’s Tourism Product Packaging Experiences- Research Report 2004–7. Ottawa: Canadian Tourism Commission.
Darmawijaya, M. I. (1990). Klasifikasi Tanah: Dasar Teori Bagi Peneliti Tanah dan Pelaksana Pertanian di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Darmono, D. W. (2004). Permasalahan Anggrek dan Solusinya. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya.
Gunn, C. A. (1997). Vacationscape: Developing Tourist Areas. Washington: Taylor and Francis.
Iswanto, H. (2002). Petunjuk Perawatan Anggrek. Jakarta: Agromedia Pustaka
Matsuoko, R.H. dan R. Kaplan. (2008). People needs in the urban landscape: Analysis of Landscape and Urban Planning contributions. Landscape and Urban Planning Journal 84, 7-19. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.009
Novaria, A. (2018). Devisa dari Pariwisata Terus meningkat. Retrieved from http://mediaindonesia.com
Nurisjah, S. dan Q. Pramukanto. (2007). Perencanaan Lanskap (Penuntun Praktikum). PS Arsitektur Lanskap Jur. Budidaya Pertanian Faperta IPB.
Otto J.E. dan Ritchie, J.R.B. (1996). The Service Experience in Tourism. Tourism Management 17(3), 165-174.
Pemkot Magelang (2019). Kondisi Geografis. Retrieve from http://www.magelangkota.go.id/
Polat A.T. dan A. Akay (2015). Relationships between the visual preferences of urban recreation areausers and various landscape design elements. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 14, 573–582
Ritchie, B. W., Neil C, & Christopher PC. (2003). Managing Educational Tourism. England: Channel View Clevedon Publication.
Simonds, OJ dan BW. Starke. (2006). Landscape Architecture. New Yortk: McGraw-Hill Book Company.
Spirn, AW. (1998). The Language of Landscape. US: Thomson-Shore Inc.
Wijayanti, A., J Damanik, C. Fandeli & Sudarmadji. (2017). Analysis of Supply and Demand to En-hance Educational Tourism Experience in the Smart Park of Yogyakarta, Indonesia. Eco-nomies 5(42), doi:10.3390/ economies5040042
Yulia N.D. dan R.M. Yanti. (2010). Anggrek Epifit dan Pohon inangnya di Kawasan Gunung Penang-gungan, Pasuruan-Jawa Timur. Jurnal Berk. Penel. Hayati, Edisi Khusus 4A: 37-40.
Xu, J.B. (2010). Perceptions of tourism products. Tourism Management 31, 607-610.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 LANGKAU BETANG: JURNAL ARSITEKTUR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Holder: Langkau Betang: Jurnal Arsitektur, By submitting the manuscript, Authors willing to delivered the copyright to the publisher. Authors are free to use their published manuscript as a reference in their later works
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share "” copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt "” remix, transform, and build upon the material
- for any purpose, even commercially.
- Attribution "” You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions "” You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
