SPACE SYNTAX: PENGARUH KONFIGURASI JARINGAN JALAN PADA PERGERAKAN DAN PEMANFAATAN LAHAN DI RUANG PERKOTAAN. STUDI KASUS KOTA YOGYAKARTA
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26418/lantang.v12i1.82435Keywords:
Ruang Perkotaan, Jaringan Jalan, Space Syntax, KonfigurasiAbstract
Ruang perkotaan merupakan ruang dinamis tempat di mana penghuni kota berinteraksi. Interaksi manusia dalam ruang- ruang perkotaan akan memberikan pengaruh terhadap perkembangan perkotaan itu sendiri. Memahami hubungan manusia, pergerakan dan ruang perkotaan akan memudahkan melihat bagaimana ruang berkembang. Dalam sistim perkotaan Konfigurasi mempunyai pengaruh yang besar dimana bentuk dan pola jaringan jalan akan menjadi penghubung setiap ruang perkotaan. Tujuan penelitian untuk memberi pemahaman bagaimana jaringan jalan mempengaruhi pola pergerakan,penggunaan lahan serta perkembangan perkotaan. Pendekatan teori dan metode Space Syntax digunakan untuk mendapakan hasil interpretasi dan mengungkapkan hal tersebut. Hasil dari penelitian pada jaringan jalan Kota Yogyakarta mengunakan nilai NACH (Normalized Angular Choice) dan NAIN (Normalized Angular Integration) didapat hasil bahwa nilai yang sama sama tinggi pada dua nilai akan mempengaruhi pola mobilitas dan pergerakan menuju dan dari jaringan serta pemanfaatan lahan sebagai area komersial. Nilai integrasi dan choice baik rendah atau tinggi akan berpengaruh terhadap bagaimana perkembangan dan pemanfaatan lahan perkotaan
References
Aggius-Vella, E., Gori, M., Campus, C., Petri, S., & Tinelli, F. (2022). Motor Influence in Developing Auditory Spatial Cognition in Hemiplegic Children with and without Visual Field Disorder. Children, 9(7), 1055. https://doi.org/10.3390/children9071055
Akyıldız, N. A. (2020). The Concept of Space from the Space-Individual Relationship Perspective. In International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (Vol. 5, Issue 2). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/347485630
Argota Sánchez-Vaquerizo, J., Hausladen, C. I., Mahajan, S., Matter, M., Siebenmann, M., van Eggermond, M. A. B., & Helbing, D. (2024). A Virtual Reality Experiment to Study Pedestrian Perception of Future Street Scenarios. Scientific Reports, 14(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55073-x
Baeza, J. L., Carpio-Pinedo, J., Sievert, J., Landwehr, A., Preuner, P., Borgmann, K., Avakumović, M., Weissbach, A., Bruns-Berentelg, J., & Noennig, J. R. (2021). Modeling pedestrian flows: Agent-based simulations of pedestrian activity for land use distributions in urban developments. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(16). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169268
Cervero, R., & Kockelman, K. (1997). Travel demand and the 3Ds: Density, diversity, and design. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 2(3), 199–219. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1361-9209(97)00009-6
Chen, S., Fu, L., Fang, J., & Yang, P. (2019). The effect of obstacle layouts on pedestrian flow in corridors: An experimental study. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.122333
Duives, D., Daamen, W., & Hoogendoorn, S. (2014). Influence of group size and group composition on the adhered distance headway. 2, 183–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2014.09.026
Elgamal, S. A., Sheta, S., & Foda, M. (2020). Optimizing Public Transportation Networks Using Space Syntax as an Evidence-Based Approach: The Case Study of Mansoura City. (Dept. A). Mansoura Engineering Journal, 45(4), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.21608/bfemu.2020.118212
Falcón-Lezama, J. A., MartÃnez-Vega, R. A., Kuri-Morales, P. A., Ramos-Castañeda, J., & Adams, B. (2016). Day-to-Day Population Movement and the Management of Dengue Epidemics. Bulletin of Mathematical Biology, 78(10), 2011–2033. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11538-016-0209-6
Fareh, F., & Alkama, D. (2022). The Effect of Spatial Configuration on the Movement Distribution Behavior. Engineering Technology & Applied Science Research. https://doi.org/10.48084/etasr.5169
Freire De Almeida, H., Lopes, R. J., Carrilho, J. M., & Eloy, S. (2021). Unfolding the dynamical structure of Lisbon’s public space: Space syntax and micromobility data. Applied Network Science, 6(1), 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41109-021-00387-2
Fromkin, V, Rodman, R, & Hyams, N. (2014). An Introduction to Language Tenth Edition. M A Wadsworth.
Gaglione, F., Cottrill, C., & Gargiulo, C. (2021). Urban services, pedestrian networks and behaviors to measure elderly accessibility. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102687
Gilliam, J. F., & Fraser, D. F. (2001). MOVEMENT IN CORRIDORS: ENHANCEMENT BY PREDATION THREAT, DISTURBANCE, AND HABITAT STRUCTURE. Ecology, 82(1), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[0258:MICEBP]2.0.CO;2
Gonzalez-Rubio, M., Velasquez, N. F., & Torres-Oviedo, G. (2019). Explicit control of step timing during split-belt walking reveals interdependent recalibration of movements in space and time. https://doi.org/10.1101/614644
Guo, Y., Hu, X., & Tang, J. (2023). Structural Landmark Salience Computation in Compact Urban Districts with 3D Node-Landmark Grid Analysis Model: A Case Study on Two Sample Districts in Changsha, China. Buildings, 13(4), 1024. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings13041024
Helbing, D., Buzna, L., Johansson, A., & Werner, T. (2005). Self-organized pedestrian crowd dynamics: Experiments, simulations, and design solutions. Transportation Science, 39(1), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1287/trsc.1040.0108
Helbing, D., & Molnár, P. (1995). Social force model for pedestrian dynamics. Physical Review E, 51(5), 4282–4286. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.51.4282
Hermida, C., Cordero, M., & Orellana, D. (2019). Analysis of the influence of urban built environment on pedestrian flow in an intermediate-sized city in the Andes of Ecuador. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 13(10), 777–787. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1514445
Hidayati, I., Yamu, C., & Tan, W. (2021). You have to drive: Impacts of planning policies on urban form and mobility behavior in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Journal of Urban Management, 10(1), 69–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2020.12.004
Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The Social Logic of Space (Vol. 1). CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS.
Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. (1993). Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment & Planning B: Planning & Design, 20(1), 29–66. https://doi.org/10.1068/b200029
Jia, X., Jiang, N., Zhang, P., Li, M., Yu, H., Ju, X., & Yang, L. (2024). An experimental study of pedestrian bidirectional flow through bottlenecks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment, 2024(2). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/ad1bec
Kang, C.-D. (2015). The effects of spatial accessibility and centrality to land use on walking in Seoul, Korea. Cities, 46, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.05.006
Karimi, K. (2017). Space Syntax: Consolidation and Transformation of an Urban Research Field. Journal of Urban Design. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809.2018.1403177
Kashef, M. (2023). Mixed-use and Street Network Attributes of Vibrant Urban Settings. Architecture and Urban Planning, 19(1), 188–199. https://doi.org/10.2478/aup-2023-0017
Khairanisa, F. (2022). Function, Role, Limitation, and Potential of Space Syntax Analysis in Architectural Field. Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Architecture. https://doi.org/10.24002/jarina.v1i2.6093
Kim, M., & Piao, G. (2017). A study on the applying concept of metric weighting to space syntax. Journal of Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 16(3), 447–454. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.16.447
Lasmini. (2021). A SYNTACTICAL ANALYSIS IN THE ENGLISH SONG LYRIC OF "THANK YOU (pp. 249–260).
Leccese, F., Lista, D., Salvadori, G., Beccali, M., & Bonomolo, M. (2020). On the Applicability of the Space Syntax Methodology for the Determination of Street Lighting Classes. Energies. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13061476
Lee, R., Wakamiya, S., & Sumiya, K. (2015). Exploring geospatial cognition based on location-based social network sites. World Wide Web, 18(4), 845–870. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11280-014-0284-2
Liu, Q., Fu, W., Cecil C. Konijnendijk van den Bosch, Xiao, Y., Zhu, Z., Da, Y., Zhu, N., Huang, Q., & Lan, S. (2018). Do Local Landscape Elements Enhance Individuals’ Place Attachment to New Environments? A Cross-Regional Comparative Study in China. Sustainability, 10(9), 3100. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093100
López-Jiménez, J. (2022). Densities and the resulting urban form in urban planning for life and social interaction: The case of Alicante. Ciudad y Territorio Estudios Territoriales, 53(211), 37–56. https://doi.org/10.37230/CyTET.2022.211.3
Machado, M. H., & Lima, J. P. (2015). Multicriteria evaluation of people with reduced mobility accessibility: A study in downtown Itajubá (MG). Urbe, 7(3), 368–382. https://doi.org/10.1590/2175-3369.007.003.AO08
Marian.N, Mu`in F, & Arief, Y. A. (2019). An Introduction to Linguistic. Jurusan PBS FKIP Universitas Lambung Mangkurat.
Moeini, S. M. (2012). Attitudes to Urban Walking in Tehran. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39(2), 344–359. https://doi.org/10.1068/b36177
Moussaïd, M., Perozo, N., Garnier, S., Helbing, D., & Theraulaz, G. (2010). The walking behaviour of pedestrian social groups and its impact on crowd dynamics. PLoS ONE, 5(4). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010047
Nitschke, J. L., & Lorenzon, M. (2020). Archaeology, Architecture, and the Postcolonial Critique. In J. L. Nitschke & M. Lorenzon (Eds.), Postcolonialism, Heritage, and the Built Environment (pp. 1–11). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-60858-3_1
Othman, F., M. Yusoff, Z., & Salleh, S. A. (2020). Assessing the visualization of space and traffic volume using GIS-based processing and visibility parameters of space syntax. Geo-Spatial Information Science, 23(3), 209–221. https://doi.org/10.1080/10095020.2020.1811781
Pafka, E., Dovey, K., & Aschwanden, G. (2018). Limits of Space Syntax for Urban Design: Axiality, Scale and Sinuosity. Environment and Planning B Urban Analytics and City Science, 47(3), 508–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808318786512
Pafka, E., Dovey, K., & Aschwanden, G. D. P. A. (2020). Limits of space syntax for urban design: Axiality, scale and sinuosity. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 47(3), 508–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399808318786512
Paul, A. (2011). Axial Analysis: A Syntactic Approach to Movement Network Modelin. Institute of Town Planners, India Journal, 8(1), 29–40.
Pearce, D. M., Matsunaka, R., Oba, T., & Yamamoto, S. (2021). Utilising dedicated pedestrian networks to understand the relationship between accessibility and pedestrian density in Asian cities. International Journal of Transport Development and Integration, 5(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.2495/TDI-V5-N2-150-161
Penn, A. (2003). Space Syntax and Spatial Cognition. Environment and Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916502238864
Qi, J., Mazumdar, S., & Vasconcelos, A. C. (2024). Understanding the Relationship between Urban Public Space and Social Cohesion: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Community Well-Being. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42413-024-00204-5
Ramoo, D. (2021). Psychology of language.
Rashid, M., Kampschroer, K., Wineman, J., & Zimring, C. (2006). Spatial Layout and Face-to-Face Interaction in Offices—A Study of the Mechanisms of Spatial Effects on Face-to-Face Interaction. Environment and Planning B Planning and Design. https://doi.org/10.1068/b31123
Salama, A. M., Remali, A. M., & MacLean, L. (2017). Deciphering urban life: A multi-layered investigation of St. Enoch Square, Glasgow City Centre. Archnet-IJAR: International Journal of Architectural Research, 11(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.26687/archnet-ijar.v11i2.1278
Septianingrum, I., Irmawati, E., & Mutia, F. (2022). Representation and Meaning of Space According to Metaphysical Architecture. Architectural Research Journal (ARJ), 2(1), 30–34. https://doi.org/10.22225/arj.2.1.2022.30-34
Shen, Y., Karimi, K., Law, S., & Zhong, C. (2019). Physical co-presence intensity: Measuring dynamic face-to-face interaction potential in public space using social media check-in records. PLoS ONE, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212004
Sheng, Q., Wan, D., & Yu, B. (2021). Effect of space configurational attributes on social interactions in urban parks. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13147805
Siewwuttanagul, S., Hayashida, Y., & Inohae, T. (2018). IDENTIFYING PEDESTRIAN MOVEMENT BEHAVIOUR USING OBJECT DETECTION METHODS and LAND-USE AGGLOMERATION ANALYSIS. 4(4/W7), 123–128. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-4-W7-123-2018
Simonnet, M., & Vieilledent, S. (2012). Accuracy and Coordination of Spatial Frames of Reference during the Exploration of Virtual Maps: Interest for Orientation and Mobility of Blind People? Advances in Human-Computer Interaction, 2012, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/835246
Sun, S., Sun, C., Duives, D. C., & Hoogendoorn, S. P. (2021). Deviation of Pedestrian Path due to the Presence of Building Entrances. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5594738
Thinnakorn, R. & Boontaree Chanklap. (2022). Influence of the Global Urban Grid on Natural Movement within a Local Public Space: Case Study of Nakhon Si Thammarat Old Town, Thailand. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 10(4), 174–191. https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.10.4_174
Thinnakorn, R., & Chanklap, B. (2022). Influence of the Global Urban Grid on Natural Movement within a Local Public Space. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 10(4), 174–191. https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.10.4_174
Turner, A. (2007). From Axial to Road-Centre Lines: A New Representation for Space Syntax and a New Model of Route Choice for Transport Network Analysis. Environment and Planning B Planning and Design, 34(3), 539–555. https://doi.org/10.1068/b32067
Van Nes, A., & Yamu, C. (2021). Introduction to Space Syntax in Urban Studies. In Introduction to Space Syntax in Urban Studies. Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59140-3
Vroman, L., & Lagrange, T. (2017). Human movement in Public spaces: The use and development of motion-oriented design strategies. Design Journal, 20(sup1), S3252–S3261. https://doi.org/10.1080/14606925.2017.1352830
Wolford, W. (2004). This Land Is Ours Now: Spatial Imaginaries and the Struggle for Land in Brazil. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 94(2), 409–424. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8306.2004.09402015.x
Yamu, C., van Nes, A., & Garau, C. (2021). Bill hillier’s legacy: Space syntax—A synopsis of basic concepts, measures, and empirical application. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063394
Yildiz Ozkan, D., & Cekmis, A. (2024). The Impact of Passages on Street Connectivity in Commercial Areas: The case of Besiktas market area in Istanbul. Architecture, City and Environment, 18(54). https://doi.org/10.5821/ace.18.54.12088
Zenobi, L. (2021). Mobility and urban space in early Modern Europe: An introduction. Journal of Early Modern History, 25(1–2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1163/15700658-BJA10035
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 LANGKAU BETANG: JURNAL ARSITEKTUR
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Copyright Holder: Langkau Betang: Jurnal Arsitektur, By submitting the manuscript, Authors willing to delivered the copyright to the publisher. Authors are free to use their published manuscript as a reference in their later works
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share "” copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt "” remix, transform, and build upon the material
- for any purpose, even commercially.
- Attribution "” You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions "” You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
- You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation.
- No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
