Stratification, Segregation and Streaming within Schools
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26418/ijli.v3i1.34554Abstract
Herein the culturally related human action of grouping people is examined as a phenomenon that has existing for many years in our global society. Today grouping people can be understood and labelled as stratification, segregation and streaming and can most readily be observed within schools and educational institutions. These grouping efforts and actions are addressed in related literature as sorting, tracking and categorization that may be at times tacit in classrooms and educational programs; nonetheless there are often life-long implications for streaming each student. Some education theorists may believe educators can sort students via assessment and evaluation of student academic ability however such attempts can be quite problematic, causing feelings of exclusion, marginalization and rejection. Academic ability is currently much more than a score on a summative assessment as academic ability has many social (home, community, engagement) and education elements (pre-school, instruction quality, class size, test bias). This iterative review illuminates issues, problems and concerns that may lead to possible resolutions for educators when grouping students.
References
References
Apple, M. W. (2004). Ideology and curriculum. (3rd ed.). New York: Routledge/Falmer.
Apple, M.A. (2001). Comparing neo-liberal projects and inequality in education.
Comparative Education, 37(4), 409–423.
Block, S., & G.E. Galabuzi. (2011). Canada’s colour coded labour market.Toronto, ON: Wellesley Institute and the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives.
Bowles, S., & Herbert G. (1976). Schooling in capitalist America: Education reform and the contradictions of economic life. Chicago, IL: Haymarket.
Burris, C. C., Welner, K. G., & Bezoza, J. W. (2009). Universal access to a quality education: Research and recommendations for the elimination of curricular stratification. Boulder, CO: National Education Policy Center. Retrieved from http://nepc.colorado.edu/files/Epic-Epru_LB-UnivAcc-FINAL.pdf/
Cashin, S. (2014). Place not race: A new vision of opportunity in America. Boston, MA:
Beacon Press.
Chmielewski, A. K. (2014). An International comparison of achievement inequality in within- and between-school tracking systems. American Journal of Education, 120(3). 293-324.
Chmielewski, A.K., Dumont, H., & Trautwein, U. (2013). Tracking effects depend on tracking type: An international comparison of mathematics self-concept. American Educational Research Journal, 50(5). 925-957.
Clanfield, D., Curtis, B., Galabuzi, G. E., Gaymes San Vincente, A., Livingstone, D., & Smaller, H. (2014). Restacking the deck: Streaming by class, race, and gender in Ontario schools. Ottawa: Our Schools/Our Selves.
Coleman, A. L. (2016). A quantitative analysis of school-level factors and their impact on the racial achievement gap. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Madison: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Retrieved from http://dc.uwm.edu/etd/1356
Coley, R. J., & Baker, B. (2013). Poverty and education: Finding the way forward. Washington, U.S.A. Educational Testing Service Center for Research on Human Capital and Education.
Collins, C. C., & Gan, L. (2013). Does sorting students improve scores? An analysis of class composition. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w18848
Connelly, R. (2012). Social Stratification and Cognitive Ability: An assessment of the influence of childhood ability test scores and family background on occupational position across the lifespan. In Lambert, P., Connelly, R., Blackburn, R., & Gayle, V (Eds.). Social Stratification: Trends and Processes (pp. 101-114). Farnham: Ashgate.
Connelly, R. (2013). Social stratification and education: Case studies analysing social survey data. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Stirling, Stirling, Scotland.
Cooper, H. (1982). Scientific guidelines for conducting integrative research reviews.
Review of Educational Research, 52, 291-302.
Cooper, H. M. (1989). Integrating research: A guide for literature reviews (2nd ed.).
Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Council for Creative Education. (2018). Web page retrieved from https://www.ccefinland.org/contact-us
de Almeida Lopes Fernandes, G. A. (2017). Is the Brazilian Tale of Peaceful Racial Coexistence True? Some Evidence from School Segregation and the Huge Racial Gap in the Largest Brazilian City. World Development, 98, 179-194. doi:10.1016/j.worlddev.2017.04.025
Doren, C. J. (2013). Unequal Equality: The effects of socioeconomic status on academic
achievement in open and closed societies. (Unpublished undergraduate thesis). Wesleyan University, Middletown, Ct.
Epps, E. G. (1995). Race, class, and educational opportunity: Trends in the sociology of
education. Sociological Forum, 10(4), 593-608. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/684773
Finnvold, J. E. (2018). Will my child ever go to a university? The link between school segregation practices and Norwegian parents’ expectations for their physically disabled child. Journal of Research in Special Educational Needs, 18(2), 103-113. doi:10.1111/1471-3802.12397
Flinders, D. J., & Thornton, S. J. (2013). The curriculum studies reader (Fourth ed.). New York; Routledge.
Forgasz, H. (2010). Streaming for mathematics in Victorian secondary schools. Australian Mathematics Teacher, 66(1), 31 - 40.
Fredericks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74, 59-109. doi:10.3102/00346543074001059
Freeman, E., Frydenberg, E., Begg, B., & Care, E. (2010). Teachers working in teams to enhance teacher-student relationships and learning. Education Connect, 16-19.
Frempong, G., Ma, Z., & Mensah, J. (2012). Access to postsecondary education: Can schools compensate for socioeconomic disadvantage? Higher Education, 63, 19- 32. doi: 10.1007/s10734-011-9422-2
Gentry, M. (2016). Commentary on “Does Sorting Students Improve Scores? An Analysis of Class Compositionâ€. Journal of Advanced Academics, 27(2), 124-130. doi:10.1177/1932202X16636174Gorski, P.C. (2012). Perceiving the problem of poverty and schooling: Deconstructing the class stereotypes that mis- shape education policy and practice. Equity & Excellence in Education, 45 (2), 302-319.
Graham, E. (2015, September 2). School suspension and the racial gap. [Blog] JSTOR Daily. Retrieved from https://daily.jstor.org/school-suspensions-racial-discipline-gap/
Hallinan, M. (1994). Tracking: From theory to practice. Sociology of Education,
, 79–84.
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
Hidalgo-Hidalgo, M. (2014). Tracking can be more equitable than mixing. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 116(4), 964-981.
Higgins, M. K. (2013). United States and Canada: The Impact of the Socioeconomic Gap on Education Performance. (Unpublished honors thesis). University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TE. Retrieved from http://trace.tennessee.edu/utk_chanhonoproj/1626
Ho, L. (2014). Meritocracy, Tracking, and Elitism: Differentiated Citizenship Education in the United States and Singapore. Social Studies, 105(1), 29-35.
doi:10.1080/00377996.2013.788473
Hoover, N. R., & Abrams, L. M. (2013). Teachers’ Instructional Use of Summative Student Assessment Data. Applied Measurement in Education, 26(3), 219–231. doi:10.1080/08957347.2013.793187
Jones, O. (2011). Chavs: The demonization of the working class. London: Verso.
Kerckhoff, A.C. (2001). Education and social stratification processes in comparative.
Perspective. Sociology of Education, 74, 3–18. ISSN 0038-0407
Kinnon, E. R. (2016). (In)equity and academic streaming in Ontario: Effects on students and teachers and how to overcome these. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, ON.
Lee, V. E., & Smith, J. B. (1993). Effects of school restructuring on the
achievement and engagement of middle-grade students. Sociology of Education,
, 164-187.
Liu, W. M., Pickett, T. J., & Ivey, A. E. (2007). White middle-class privilege: Social
class bias and implications for training and practice. Journal of Multicultural
Counseling and Development, 35, 194-206.
Lucas, S. R. (1999). Tracking inequality: Stratification and mobility in American high schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Mansor, A. N., Maniam, P. P., Hunt, M. C., & Nor, M. Y. M. (2016). Benefits and disadvantages of streaming practices to accommodate students by ability. Creative Education, 7, 2547-2558. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/ce.2016.717241
Merritt, R. D. (2018). Ability Grouping. Ability Grouping -- Research Starters Education, 1.
Messing, V. (2017). Differentiation in the making: Consequences of school segregation of Roma in the Czech Republic, Hungary, and Slovakia. European Education, 49(1), 89-103. doi:10.1080/10564934.2017.1280336
Ming Ming, C., Bonnie Wing-Yin, C., & Sung Wook, J. (2017). Streaming, tracking and reading achievement: A multilevel analysis of students in 40 countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(7), 915-934. doi:10.1037/edu0000188
Modica, M. (2015). My skin color stops me from leading: Tracking, identity, and student dynamics in a racially mixed school. International Journal of Multicultural Education, 17(3), 76-90.
Noggle, V. J. (2014). A Race to the Finish: An Analysis of Factors Contributing to the Achievement Gap in Portland Public School District. (Unpublished honors thesis). Portland, OR: Portland State University. Retrieved from http://pdxscholar.library.pdx.edu/honorstheses/90/
Norman, P.C. (2016). Teacher attitudes and perceptions of low and high socioeconomic status students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Utah State University, Logan, Utah.
Oakes, J. (2005). Keeping track: how schools structure inequality (2nd ed.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Oakes, J., Amy, S, W., Makeba, J., & Amanda, D. (1997). Detracking: the social construction of ability, cultural politics, and resistance to reform. Teachers College Record 98 (3), 482–510.
OECD. (2010a). PISA 2009 Results: Overcoming Social Background-Equity in Learning
Opportunities and Outcomes (Volume II).
OECD. (2010b). PISA 2009 Results: What Students Know and Can Do-Student Performance in Reading, Science and Math. Volume I.
OECD. (2012). Public and Private Schools: How Management and Funding Relate to their Socio-economic Profile. OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264175006-en
OECD. (2013). PISA in focus: What do students think about school? Paris: OECD.
Pajares, F., & Urdan, T. (Eds.). (2006). Adolescence and education: Self-efficacy beliefs of adolescents. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Park, V., & Datnow, A. (2017). Ability Grouping and Differentiated Instruction in an Era of Data-Driven Decision Making. American Journal of Education, 123(2), 281-306.
Parkay, F. W., Hardcastle Stanford, B., Vaillancourt, J. P., Stephens, H. C., & Harris, J. R. (2012). Becoming a teacher. (4th ed.). Pearson Canada: Toronto.
Parekh, G. G. (2014). Social citizenship and disability: identity, belonging, and the structural organization of education. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). York University, Toronto.
Pearce, A., Sawyer, A. C. P., Chittleborough, C. R., Mittinty, M. N., Law, C., & Lynch, J. W. (2016). Do early life cognitive ability and self-regulation skills explain socio-economic inequalities in academic achievement? An effect decomposition analysis in UK and Australian cohorts. Social Science & Medicine, 165, 108–118. Retrieved from http://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.07.016
People for Education. (2015). Ontario’s schools: The gap between policy and reality. Annual Report on Ontario’s Publicly Funded Schools. Toronto, ON: People for Education.
Perry, L.B. (2015, February 19). The lesson from Canada: Why Australia should have fewer selective schools. The Conversation. Retrieved from http://theconversation.com/the-lesson-from-canada-why-australia-should-have-fewer-selective-schools-35534
Perry, L.B., & McConney, A. (2013). School socioeconomic status and student outcomes in reading and mathematics: A comparison of Australia and Canada. Australian Journal of Education, 57 (2). 124-140.
Pew Research Center. (2013, February 15). U.S. students’ academic achievement still lags that of their peers in many other countries. Retrieved from http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2017/02/15/u-s-students-internationally-math-science/
Picot, G., Y. Lu., & F. Hou. (2009). Immigrant low-income rates: The role of market income and government transfers. Ottawa, ON: Statistics Canada. Retrieved from http://www.statcan.gc.ca/pub/11f0019m/2014364/t/tbl01-eng.htm
Ravitch, D. (2013). Reign of Error: The Hoax of the Privatization Movement and the Danger to America's Public Schools. New York: Random House.
Reid, D. K., & Knight, M. G. (2006). Disability justifies exclusion of minority students: A critical history grounded in disability studies. Educational Researcher, 35, 18-23.
Rist, R. (1970). Social class and teacher expectations: The self-fulfilling prophecy in ghetto education, Harvard Educational Review, 40, 411-451.
Robinson, J., & Smyth, J. (2016). ‘Sent out’ and Stepping Back In: stories from young people ‘placed at risk’. Ethnography & Education, 11(2), 222-236. doi:10.1080/17457823.2015.1040430
Singapore Government. (2018). Education system: The Singapore education landscape. Ministry of Education. Retrieved from https://www.moe.gov.sg/education/education-system
Singleton, G., & Linton, C. (2006). A field guide for achieving equity in schools: courageous conversations about race. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Slavin, R.E. (1987a). Ability grouping and student achievement in elementary schools: A best evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 57(3), 293-336.
Slavin, R. E. (1987b). Grouping for instruction in the elementary school. Educational Psychologist, 22(2), 109-127.
Smaller, H. (2014). Conclusion unstacking the deck: A new deal for our schools. Our Schools / Our Selves, 23(2), 261-305.
Smith, C. (2011). “Ability†in Primary Mathematics Education: Patterns and Implications. Proceedings of the British Society for Research into Learning Mathematics, 31, 91-97.
Steenbergen-Hu, S., Makel, M. C., & Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2016). What One Hundred Years of Research Says About the Effects of Ability Grouping and Acceleration on K–12 Students’ Academic Achievement. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 849-899. doi:10.3102/0034654316675417.
Srivastava, P., & Hopwood, N. (2009). A practical iterative framework for qualitative
data analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 8, 76–84.
Toronto District School Board. (2015). Destreaming at the grade 9 level. Report no. 09-15-2654. Retrieved from http://www.tdsb.on.ca/Leadership/Boardroom/AgendaMinutes.aspx?Type=A&Folder=Agenda%2F20151007&Filename=151007+Destreaming+2654+No+appPOST.pdf
Tuval, S. (2014). Teachers living with contradictions: Social representations of inclusion, exclusion and stratification in Israeli schools. Papers on Social Representations, 23, 10.1-10.25. Retrieved from http://www.psych.lse.ac.uk/psr/PSR2014/2014_1_10.pdf
Turner Consulting Group. (2015). Voices of black educators. The Ontario Alliance of Black School Educators (OABSE). Retrieved from www.onabse.org.
Vardardottir, A. (2015). The impact of classroom peers in a streaming system. Economics of Education Review, 49, 110-128. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2015.09.002
Vogl, K., & Preckel, F. (2014). Full-time ability grouping of gifted students: Impacts on social self-concept and school-related attitudes. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58(1), 51-68.
Welton, A. D. (2013). Even more racially isolated than before: Problematizing the vision for “diversity†in a racially mixed high school. Teacher College Record, 115(11), 1-42.
Werblow, J., Urick, A., & Duesbery, L. (2013). On the wrong track: How tracking is associated with dropping out of high school. Excellence and Equity in Education, 46(2), 270-284.
Winheller, S., Hattie, J., & Brown, G. (2013). Factors influencing early adolescents' mathematics achievement: High-quality teaching rather than relationships. Learning Environments Research, 16(1), 49-69. doi:10.1007/s10984-012-9106-6
World Bank. (2013). Gini Index. Retrieved from.
http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SI.POV.GINI
Yang, K. J. (2009). Tracking and Detracking. Encyclopedia of the Social and Cultural
Foundations of Education. (Ed.). E. F. Provenzo, Jr., pp. (824-827), Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Zareey, S. (2013). The experiences of Mornelle court youth with secondary school streaming in Scarborough, Ontario. (Unpublished master’s thesis), Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, Toronto, ON.
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share "” copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt "” remix, transform, and build upon the material
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution "” You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial "” You may not use the material for commercial purposes .
- No additional restrictions "” You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.
