The Evaluation of Students Score Processing Information System Program (SISFO PNS) in SMK Negeri 8 Pontianak

Authors

  • Dina Mariana Tanjungpura University
  • Aloysius Mering Tanjungpura University
  • Indri Astuti Tanjungpura University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26418/ijli.v1i2.37343

Abstract

In the year of 2012 SISFO PNS, already introduced at SMK Negeri 8 Pontianak, the problem that the writer found were: teachers only open the program at the time of student report will giving to students that made the program will be busy because too many users access it, there is some teacher did not complete the process of filling session but straight to the final score, the programmer is always slow maintenance. From that problem, the writer was aimed at evaluating the implementation of SISFO PNS. The model of evaluation used in this research was CIPP (context, input, process, product). This model was developed by Daniel L. Stufflebeam and friends. The technique of data collection is used observation, interview and documentation. The method of data analysis used descriptive percentage analysis. The results of this research were (1) the evaluation percentage toward context showed that the good result with average of 85.58% (2) the evaluation percentage toward input indicated that the good result with average 73.26% (3) the evaluation percentage toward the process showed that the good result with but it needs to improve with average 67.43% (4) the evaluation percentage toward the product showed that the good result with 79.79%.

Keywords: CIPP, Program Evaluation, Students"™ Score Analyzing

References

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2008). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan : Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Asyadi. (2017). Proposal Pengembangan dan Penerapan Teknologi Informasi. Pontianak: Efosoft Cipta Solusi.

Christanto, Irwan. (2016). Pengaruh Penerapan Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi (TIK) Terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa SMU/SMK di Surakarta. STIE AUB Surakarta.

Dinas Pendidikan Kota Pontianak. Profil Sekolah.http://schoolmap.dindikptk.net/. profil.html. Di akses tanggal 22 April 2019

Hermanto dkk. Pembuatan Sistem Informasi Nilai Raport Berbasis Website di SMP Negeri 7 Surakarta. Jurnal Speed – Sentra Penelitian Engineering dan Edukasi – Volume 1 No 1 - 2009 - ijns.org

Moleong, Lexi . J. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif : Edisi Kedua. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Muhaimin, Mohammad. Model Evaluasi CIPP (Context, Input, Process, Product). https://www.kompasiana. com/muhaiminmoh/model-evaluasi-cip p-context-input-process-product 552ab300f17e611530d62496. Di aks es 15 Mei 2018.

Riana, I Gede Arnawa dkk. (2015). Evaluasi Program Sekolah Terhadap Pelaksanaan KTSP. Kementrian Riset dan Teknologi Pendidikan Universitas Pendidkan Ganesha.

Setiyaningrum, Ayu. (2016). Implementasi Model Evaluasi CIPP Pada Pelaksanaan Program Pendidikan Dan Pelatihan di BPTT Darman Prasetyo Yogyakarta. Skripsi.

Program Studi Teknologi Pendidikan Jurusan Kurikulum dan Teknologi Pendidikan Pendidikan. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.

Sugiyono. (2015). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan dengan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta

Sukardi. (2011). Evaluasi Pendidikan: Prinsip Dan Operasionalnya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Ulansari, Lyna Ukti dkk. (2016). Inovasi Sekolah Berbasis Teknologi Informasi Dalam Meningkatkan Mutu Pendidikan kejuruan (Studi kasus pada SMK PGRI 3 Malang). Jurnal Administrasi Publik Fakultas Ilmu Administrasi. Universitas Brawijaya Malang.

Wardani, Endah Setyo dkk. (2017). Sistem Informasi di SMK dan Upaya Peningkatan Kinerjanya. JIPI (Jurnal Ilmiah Penelitian dan Pembelajaran Informatika) Volume 02, Nomor 01, Mei 2017.

Downloads

Published

2019-11-01

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019): Volume 1 Number 2 October 2019

Section

Articles

License

 

This work is licensed under  a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

You are free to:

  1. Share  "” copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
  2. Adapt  "” remix, transform, and build upon the material
  3. The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.

Under the following terms:

  1. Attribution  "” You must give  appropriate credit  , provide a link to the license, and  indicate if changes were made  . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  2. NonCommercial  "” You may not use the material for  commercial purposes  .
  3. No additional restrictions  "” You may not apply legal terms or  technological measures  that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.

Notices:

You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable  exception or limitation  .

No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as  publicity, privacy, or moral rights  may limit how you use the material.