The Implementation of Learning Tournament Strategy on Linear Equation in One Variable

Authors

  • Heru Gunawan SMP Negeri 11 Pontianak
  • Edy Tandililing Universitas Tanjungpura
  • Ahmad Yani Universitas Tanjungpura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26418/ijli.v2i2.43372

Abstract

 

The fact that is often found in schools so far, the learning process of mathematics still uses conventional methods. This study aimed to see the effect of applying the learning tournament strategy on student learning outcomes on the linear equation in one variable in VII grade at SMP N 11 Pontianak. The method used in this research was quasi-experimental. The research sample was students of VII A grade as the experimental class and VII C grade as the control class. The experimental group learning outcomes obtained an average score of 28.525, with a percentage of 63.39, while the learning outcomes in the control group obtained an average score of 22.625 with a percentage of 50.28. The results of the t-test with independent samples test obtained a Sig score. (2-tailed) = 0.000 < ½ 0.025, then H0 is rejected, so it can be concluded that there is a significant difference in student learning outcomes between the class given the learning tournament learning and the class given conventional learning on the linear equation in one variable.

 

Keywords: Learning Tournament, Learning Strategy, Linear Equation of One Variable

Author Biographies

Heru Gunawan, SMP Negeri 11 Pontianak

            

Edy Tandililing, Universitas Tanjungpura

         

Ahmad Yani, Universitas Tanjungpura

      

References

Abdurrahman, M. (2003). Pendidikan bagi Anak Berkesulitan Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Adinawan, M. Cholik & Sugijono. (2008). Seribu Pena Matematika untuk SMP/MTs Kelas VII. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Ahmadi, A & Supriyono. (2004). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Arikunto, S. (1985). Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

_________. (1988). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

_________.(1993). Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: Bineka Cipta.

Dahar, R. W. (1989). Teori-Teori Belajar. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Dargiri, H., et al. (1987). Dasar-dasar Program Pelajaran Bimbingan Belajar di Sekolah. Pontianak: FKIP UNTAN.

Daniels, H & Anghileri, J (1995). Secondary mathematics and special educatioanal needs. New York: cassel.

Depdikbud. (2004). Kurikulum Pendidikan Dasar, Garis-Garis Besar Program Pengajaran Matematika. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Eggen, P. D. & Kauchack, D. P. (1996). Strategies for Teachers Teaching Content and Thinking Skills. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Ibrahim, M., Rachmadiarti, F., Nur, M., & Ismono. (2000). Pembelajaran Kooperatif. Surabaya: University Press.

Nawawi, H & Hartini, H. (1992). Instrument Penelitian Bidang Social.Yogyakarta: University Press.

Poerwadarminta, W.J.S. (1986). Kamus Umum Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it (2nd Ed).Princetan : Princeton University Press.http:// www.sibi.or.id

Posamentier, A. S & Stepelman, J. (1995). Teaching Secondary School Mathematics. New Jersey: Prentice – Hall Inc.

Robert E.S. (2008). Cooperative Learning, Teori, Riset dan Praktik. Bandung:Nusa Media

Ruseffendi, E.T. (1990). Pengajaran Matematika Modern dan Masa Kini untuk Guru PGSD D2. Bandung: Tarsito.

______________. (1994). Dasar-Dasar Penelitian Pendidikan dan Bidang Non-Eksakta Lainnya. Semarang: IKIP Press.

Salvin R.(1997). Education psychology and Practice.Fitfth Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

Silberman, M. (1996). Active Learning 101 Strategi Pembelajaran Aktif. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Insan Madani.

Slavin, R. E. (1995). Cooperative Learning Theory, Research, and Practise, Allyn & Bacon A Simon & Schuster Company, Second Edition, Singapore.

Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Suherman, E., et al. (2001). Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI).

Suwarsono. (2002). Teori-teori Perkembangan Kognitif dan Proses Pembelajaran yang Relevan Untuk Pembelajaran Matematika. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan Nasional (DEPDIKNAS).

Toom, A. (2006). Tacit Pedagogical Knowing At the Core of Teacher's Professionality. Helsinki: University of Helsinki.

Trihendradi, C. (2008). Step by Step SPSS 17 Analisis Data Statistik. Yogyakarta: ANDI.

Zamroni. (2003). Pendidikan untuk Demokrasi. Yogyakarta: Bigraf Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2020-11-26