The Effectiveness of Innovative Learning on Mathematical Problem-Solving Ability: Quasi-Experimental
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26418/ijli.v4i2.59784Abstract
Quasi-experimental research or quasi-experimental research is an innovation from true experimenters, including difficult research in the fields of education and social. Although this research is difficult to do, many researchers are also interested in using a quasi-experimental design in conducting research, especially in the field of mathematics. The high interest of researchers in this study is due to the fact that quasi-experimental research is most suitable to be applied in research in the field of mathematics education which is the subject of instructional research by educators and students. Quasi-experiments are used to make it easier to control due to non-functioning due to the control group as an external variable that also has an effect. The study conducted in this study used a literature review, broadly speaking, research data collection was based on observations of related research journal articles that had been carried out by other researchers before. Quasi-experimental studies as a research vehicle that aims to examine the application of quantitative research in testing students' problem-solving abilities. Researchers need more accurate methods to be applied, theoretical studies and analysis results can be concluded that quasi-experimental research can be used as an alternative to problem solving in problem-based mathematics learning. Based on the analysis of the researcher's interest, it can be seen that in fact the researcher uses a test instrument to see the effect of solving students' mathematical problems by applying the random sampling technique.
Keywords: Quasi Experiment, Mathematical Problem Solving, Quantitative
References
Afiatin, & Martaniah. (1998). Peningkatan kepercayaan diri remaja melalui konseling kelompok. Jurnal Psikologi, 66-79.
Aprianti, & Kesumawati. (2019). Pengaruh Model Auditory Intelectal Repettion terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan MasalahDitinjau dari Disposisi Matematis di SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Rafa, 11-21.
Artika, & Karso. (2019). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Dengan Menggunakan Metode Pembelajaran Thinking Aloud Pair Problem Solving (Tapps). Jurnal PRISMA Universitas Surya Kencana , 11-21.
Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi Experimentation Design & Aanalysis Issues for field settiengs. Boston: Houghton Miffilin Company.
Effendi. (2012). Pembelajaran Matematika dengan Metode Penemuan Terbimbing untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Representasi Dan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa SMP. Jurnal Euclid , 251-265.
Fadillah, & Ahmad. (2016). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Problem Solving Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematika Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika, 1-8.
Fariha, & Mutia. (2013). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Problem Solving Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kreatif Matematika Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika, 1-8.
Fariha, M. (2013). Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Matematis dan Kecemasan Matematika dalam Pembelajaran dengan Pendekatan Problem Solving (Studi Eksperimen pada Kelas X MAN Rukoh Kota Banda Aceh). Jurnal Peluang, 43-50.
Fitriani. (2016). Hubungan Antara Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis dengan Self Cofidence Siswa SMP yang Menggunakan Pendekatan Pendidikan Matematika Realistik. . Jurnal Euclid, 251-365.
Hastjarjo. (2014). Rancangan eksperimen acak. Buletin Psikologi, 73-86.
Hastjarjo. (2019). Rancangan Eksperimen Kuasi. Buletin Psikologi, 187–203.
Imamuddin, M. (2019). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Berdasarkan Gaya Belajar. Al Khawarizmi: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika, 3(1), 11-20.
Imamuddin, M. I. M. (2018). Proses Berpikir Mahasiswa Quitter Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Geometri Dengan Pemberian Scaffolding Di Jurusan Pendidikan Matematika Iain Bukittinggi. Sainstek: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi, 9(1), 40-53.
Indriyani, A., & dkk. (2017). Eksperimen pembelajaran Matematika Melalui Model Pembelajaran Pengajuan dan Pemecahan Masalah (jucama) dan Problem Based Lerning Pada Materi Segi Empat Ditinjau Dari Kreativitas Belajar Siswa Kelas Vll Kemester Kenap SMP N 1 Karanganom Tahun Pelajaran 201. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika (JPMM), 1-9.
Isnaniah, I. (2017). Peningkatan Kreativitas dan Kemandirian Belajar Mahasiswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Berbasis Proyek pada Perkuliahan Media Pembelajaran Matematika. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education, 3(2), 83-91.
Isnaniah, I. (2018). Komunikasi Matematis dalam Pembelajaran Berdasarkan Gender. HUMANISMA: Journal of Gender Studies, 1(2), 13-23.
Jatisunda, & M. Gilar. (2017). Pengaruh Pendekatan Konstruktivisme terhadap Pemecahan Masalah Matematik Peserta Didik (Studi Quasi Eksperimen terhadap Peserta Didik Kelas VIII SMP Negeri 1 Talaga Tahun Pelajaran 2015/2016. Jurnal THEOREMS (The Original Research of Matematics), 57-67.
Levi, Y., & Ellis, T. J. (2011). A Guide for Novice Researchers on Ekperimental and Quasi Ekperimental Studies in Information Systems Research. Interdiciplany Journal of Information Knowlwdgw and Management.
Lubis, & dkk. (2020). Kemampuan Problem Solving Siswa Melalui Model Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik Berorientasi Etnomatematika Bengkulu. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Raflesia, 127-133.
Masamah, & Ulfa. (2017). Peningkatan Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Matematis Siswa SMA Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Awal Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 1-8.
Ningrum, d. (2017). Eksperimentasi Team Accelerated Instruction terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Awal Siswa. Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 118-127.
Ningrum, E. K., & dkk. (2017). Eksperimentasi Team Accelerated Instruction Terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis ditinjau dari Kemampuan Awal Siswa. Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika, 218-227.
Noviza, Nelvi, & dkk. (2017). Peningkatan Aktivitas Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VII MTsM 1 Koto Bengkulu dengan Model Pembelajaran Talking Stick. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah (JP2MS), -.
Noviza; , dkk. (2017). Peningkatan Aktivitas Belajar Matematika Siswa Kelas VII MTsN 1 Kota Bengkulu Dengan Model Pembelajaran Talking Stick. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Matematika Sekolah (JP2MS).
Nurdalihah, & dkk. (2021). Perbedaan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematika dan Pemecahan Masalah pada Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah dan Pembelajaran Konvensional di SMA Negeri 1 Kualah Selatan. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 109-119.
Nurhaliza, & dkk. (2020). Eksperimen Model Pembelajaran MMP dan Problem Solving terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika, 231-141.
Putra, & F. G. (2017). Eksperimentasi Pendekatan Kontekstual Berbantuan Hands On Activity (HoA) terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 73-80.
Salkind, N. J. (2006). Eksploring Research Sixth Edition. Pearson Internasional.
Shadish, & dkk. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suhendri, & Mardalena. (2015). Pengaruh Metode Pembelajaran Problem Solving Terhadap Hasil Belajar Matematika Ditinjau Dari Kemandirian Belajar. Jurnal Formatif , -.
Wahyuni, & dkk. (2018). Perbedaan Hasil Belajar Matematika Model PBL dan PBI Materi SPLDV di SMP Negeri 18 Palembang. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika, 11-21.
Winarni, & E. W. (2011). Penelitian Pendidikan Bengkulu. Bengkulu: Unit Penerbit FKIP Unib.
Yuliasari, & Evi. (2017). Eksperimentasi Model PBL dan Model GDL terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Ditinjau dari Kemandirian Belajar. JIPM (Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika), 1-10.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
You are free to:
- Share "” copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format
- Adapt "” remix, transform, and build upon the material
- The licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms.
Under the following terms:
- Attribution "” You must give appropriate credit , provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made . You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- NonCommercial "” You may not use the material for commercial purposes .
- No additional restrictions "” You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
Notices:
You do not have to comply with the license for elements of the material in the public domain or where your use is permitted by an applicable exception or limitation .
No warranties are given. The license may not give you all of the permissions necessary for your intended use. For example, other rights such as publicity, privacy, or moral rights may limit how you use the material.