A Sociocultural Exploration of EFL Teachers’ Beliefs about Formative Assessment in Indonesia

Authors

  • Hayatun Nufus Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Zulfadli Abdul Aziz Universitas Syiah Kuala
  • Kismullah Abdul Muthalib Universitas Syiah Kuala

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26418/jeltim.v7i2.96419

Keywords:

formative assessment, sociocultural, teachers"™ belief

Abstract

While previous studies have examined formative assessment in various contexts, limited attention has been given to how English teachers in Indonesia’s “Emancipated Curriculum” interpret and implement it within sociocultural frameworks. This study employed a qualitative descriptive design to explore the beliefs of two English teachers at a non-mover school in Banda Aceh through the lens of Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory and Black and Wiliam’s formative assessment framework. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, classroom observations, and document analysis. The findings revealed two contrasting belief orientations shaped by teaching experience and institutional support. The experienced teacher demonstrated a strong understanding of formative assessment grounded in sociocultural principles such as scaffolding and feedback within the Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD). Conversely, the novice teacher perceived assessment mainly as a tool for measuring performance, showing limited engagement in interactive or collaborative practices. Both acknowledged the importance of formative assessment but faced barriers related to time, resources, and training. The study highlights the influence of sociocultural factors on teacher beliefs and calls for continuous professional development and digital integration to foster equitable and effective learning environments. How to cite this paper: Nufus, H., Aziz, Z. A., & Muthalib, K. A. (2025). A sociocultural exploration of EFL teachers’ beliefs about formative assessment in Indonesia. Journal of English Language Teaching Innovations and Materials (Jeltim), 7(2), 80–105. https://doi.org/10.26418/jeltim.v7i2.96419

References

Alshammari, J. (2024). Sociocultural theory in practice: Addressing issues affecting English as a foreign language (EFL) teaching-learning in Hail remote schools. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 14(12), 3785–3792. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1412.12

Asare, E., & Afriyie, E. (2023). Barriers to basic school teachers' implementation of formative assessment in the Cape Coast Metropolis of Ghana. Open Education Studies, 5(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2022-0193

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5

Brown, G. T. L., Andersson, C., Winberg, M., & Palm, T. (2024). Swedish teacher conceptions of assessment: A focus on improving outcomes. Education Inquiry, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/20004508.2024.2375111

Clarke, V., & Braun, V. (2017). Thematic analysis. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 12(3), 297–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2016.1262613

Defandi, M., Zalmita, Z., Furqan, M. H., & Muridha, N. (2025). Teaching at the right level learning in improving critical thinking and problem solving in Merdeka Curriculum. Jurnal Sosioteknologi, 24(2). https://doi.org/10.5614/sostek.itbj.2025.24.2.9

Granberg, C., Palm, T., & Palmberg, B. (2021). A case study of a formative assessment practice and the effects on students’ self-regulated learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100955

Jumaat, N. F., & Che Lah, N. H. (2022). A framework for scaffolding learners’ self-regulation in a flipped classroom learning environment. KnE Social Sciences, 7(19), 759–766. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v7i19.12495

Kaymakamoglu, S. E. (2017). Teachers’ beliefs, perceived practice, and actual classroom practice in relation to traditional and constructivist teaching. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(1), 29. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n1p29

Kusumayanthi, S. (2022). The effect of peer feedback on students’ speech. English Journal Literacy Utama, 7(1), 78–85. https://doi.org/10.33197/ejlutama.v7i1.183

Loganathan, P., Abdul Talib, C., Zawadzki, R., Aliyu, F., Ali, M., & Ali Ibrahim, M. (2020). The impact of formative assessment on high achievers and low achievers: A systematic review. In Proceedings of the International Webinar on Education 2020 (pp. 1–10). University Muhammadiyah Surabaya. https://journal.um-surabaya.ac.id/Pro/article/view/5945

Margolis, A. A. (2020). Zone of proximal development, scaffolding, and teaching practice. Cultural-Historical Psychology, 16(3), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.17759/chp.2020160303

Pham, H. T. M. (2022). EFL teachers’ beliefs and practices about formative assessment: Case studies of Vietnamese university teachers [Doctoral dissertation, University of Victoria]. http://dspace.library.uvic.ca/server/api/core/bitstreams/4a106572-ade5-4607-812c-c302c89836f5/content

Selvarajoo, P. C. B., Thomeeran, H., Anbalagan, G. A., Ghazali, N. H. M., & Mokhtar, M. A. M. (2023). Written corrective feedback in an ESL Malaysian primary classroom: Teachers’ beliefs and practices. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 12(2), 831–852. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARPED/v12-i2/17087

Suyahman. (2016). Analisis kebijakan pendidikan gratis di Sekolah Menengah Atas dalam kaitannya dengan kualitas pendidikan menengah atas. Jurnal Pendidikan Kewarganegaran, 6(2), 1047–1054. Retrieved October 7, 2025, from https://ppjp.ulm.ac.id/journal/index.php/pkn/article/view/2429

Trismayanti, N. K. (2021). The effectiveness of formative assessment in improving students’ writing skill. Journal of Innovative Education Research, 4(2), 45–60. https://doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v4i2.34291

Veugen, M. J., Gulikers, J. T. M., & den Brok, P. (2021). We agree on what we see: Teacher and student perceptions of formative assessment practice. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, 101027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.101027

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: Development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Major, L. (2020). The Routledge international handbook of research on dialogic education. Routledge.

Wesely, P. M. (2024). The beliefs and experiences of world language teachers in the US. Multilingual Matters.

Wolf, S., & Brown, A. (2023). Teacher beliefs and student learning. Human Development, 67(1), 37–54. https://doi.org/10.1159/000529450

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2025-10-30

Issue

Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): October 2025

Section

Articles

License

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right to publish the work, which is simultaneously made available under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) licence: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/