Demonstrations as an essential component of the democratic system

Authors

  • Yuwono Prianto Tarumanagara University
  • Putri Meilika Nadilatasya Tarumanagara University
  • Namira Diffany Nuzan Tarumanagara University
  • Yustince Burnama Tarumanagara University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26418/jppkn.v6i2.99441

Keywords:

Democracy, Demonstration, Legal Philosophy

Abstract

Democracy, as a system of government based on popular sovereignty, places freedom of expression as a fundamental right of every citizen. One tangible manifestation of this right is demonstrations, which serve as an essential means of channeling public aspirations toward government policies. This study aims to analyze the role of demonstrations as an essential element in strengthening Indonesia"™s democratic system. The research employs a normative juridical method with a legal-philosophical and literature-based approach. The findings indicate that demonstrations play a strategic role in balancing the relationship between state authority and public participation while reinforcing democratic legitimacy. However, demonstrations often create tension between freedom of expression and public order, necessitating proportional legal regulations grounded in substantive justice. Drawing on the theories of John Stuart Mill, John Locke, and Gustav Radbruch, demonstrations should ideally be conducted peacefully, rationally, and responsibly to maintain harmony between citizens"™ rights and the public interest. Therefore, demonstrations must be regarded not as a threat but as a vital pillar of constitutional democracy in Indonesia

Author Biographies

Putri Meilika Nadilatasya, Tarumanagara University

Law Faculty, Tarumanagara University

Namira Diffany Nuzan, Tarumanagara University

Law Faculty, Tarumanagara University

Yustince Burnama, Tarumanagara University

Law Faculty, Tarumanagara University

References

Alifianto, A. H., Chrisari, B. V., Rato, D., & Setyawan, F. (2024). Implementation of the Legal Justice Concept in Indonesia: Study of John Locke’s Perspective. Rechtenstudent, 5(1), 26–35. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35719/rch.v5i1.321

Amnesty International Indonesia. (2025). Jangan Bungkam Protes Masyarakat kepada DPR dan Pemerintah. https://www.amnesty.id/kabar-terbaru/siaran-pers/jangan-bungkam-protes-masyarakat-kepada-dpr-dan-pemerintah/08/2025/?utm_soure

Budiarjo, M. (2005). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Politik. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Diana, Matheus, J., & Nugroho, H. I. (2024). Quo Vadis the Jakarta Special Regional Bill: Ideal Design Based on Constitutional Law Prespective. Journal of Constitutional and Governance Studies, 1(1), 20–37. https://doi.org/10.20885/JCGS.vol1.iss1.art2

Efriza. (2023). Ilmu Politik: Dari Ilmu Politik Sampai Sistem Pemerintahan. Alfabeta.

Febriansyah, G., & Khamid, A. (2025). Kebijakan Negara terhadap Demonstrasi Mahasiswa: Pelanggaran HAM dalam Perspektif Hukum dan Sosial. Jurnal Ilmiah Nusantara, 2(5), 941–948. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.61722/jinu.v2i5.5631

Hasan, F. (2021). Apologia: Pidato Socrates yang Diabadikan Plato. Bulan Bintang.

Hendratno, E. T. (2023). Negara Kesatuan, Desentralisasi dan Federalisme. Graha Ilmu.

Kansil, C. S. ., & Nadilatasya, P. M. (2024). Dampak Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Dinamika Politik dan Kepercayaan Publik di Indonesia: Analisis Implikasi Hukum dan Etika. UNES Law Review, 6(4), 10753–10760. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i4.2039

Lijphart, A. (2024). DEMOCRACIES: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty One Countries. Yale University Press.

Muabezi, Z. A. (2017). Negara Berdasarkan Hukum (Rechtsstaat) Bukan Kekuasaan (Machtstaat). Jurnal Hukum Dan Peradilan, 6(3), 421–446. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.6.3.2017.421-446

Mubarok, H. (2018). Demokrasi, Politik Identitas, dan Kohesi Sosial: Peluang dan Tantangan Strategi Dakwah untuk Menghalau Provokasi Politik di Indonesia. Jurnal Bimas Islam, 11(2), 365–400. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.37302/jbi.v11i2.57

Muthmainnah, L. (2023). ANALISIS FILSAFAT HUKUM ATAS GERAKAN PEMBANGKANGAN SIPIL DALAM KONTEKS MASYARAKAT DEMOKRASI MODERN. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 6(3), 316–327. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v6i3.55610

Rudyat, C. (2020). Kamus Hukum. Pustaka Mahadika.

Samekto, A. (2020). Pergeseran Pemikiran Hukum dari Era Yunani Menuju Postmodernisme. Konstitusi Pers.

Sri Soemantri. (2023). Tentang Lembaga-Lembaga Negara Menurut UUD 1945. Citra Aditya Bakti.

Tim detikNews. (2024). MK Hapus Pasal Sebar Hoaks dan Bikin Onar. DetikBali. https://www.detik.com/bali/hukum-dan-kriminal/d-7253976/mk-hapus-pasal-sebar-hoaks-dan-bikin-onar

Tjahjadi, S. P. L. (2022). Petualangan Intelektual (Konfrontasi dengan Para Filsuf dari Zaman Yunani Hingga Zaman Modern). Kanisius.

Wertheim, W. F. (2022). Masyarakat Indonesia dalam Transisi: Studi Perubahan Sosial (M. Z. Elizabeth (ed.)). Tiara Wacana.

Zain, Z. M., & Yusoff, M. A. (2020). Civil Disobedience: Concept and Practice, Asian Social Science, Vol. 13 No. 8 Tahun 2020. Asian Social Science, 13(8), 129–134. https://doi.org/10.5539/ass.v13n8p129

Downloads

Published

2025-10-13