BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF MATHEMATICAL COMMUNICATION SKILLS USING SCOPUS DATABASE
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v14i1.53902Keywords:
Mathematical Communication Skills, Bibliometrics, Scopus, VosViewerAbstract
The purpose of this study is to analyze how the development of research publication trends in mathematical communication skills in mathematics learning for the 2016-2021 period published in Scopus indexed scientific journals, review citation analysis, and examine trend analysis of terms or keywords by authors in journals and journals. The sample uses 142 article titles. Bibliometric analysis methods through quantitative studies are used to collect, process, and analyze data related to mathematical communication skills in mathematics learning. Data retrieval using PoP (Publish or Perish) software. Data analysis is descriptive quantitative. The results showed that the trend of scientific publications regarding the trend of mathematical communication skills increased from 2016-2021. It can be seen from the data that the number of articles published during 2019-2020 was the most researched on mathematical communication skills. The most cited articles related to mathematical communication skills occurred in 2019 with 97 citations. The Pisa question, communication technology, prospective mathematics teacher and self-efficacy are variables that are still rarely studied.
References
Agustina, D., Putri, M. A., & Ramadhan, M. G. (2021). Pemetaan Riset Strategi Pemasaran Bank Syariah: Analisis Bibliometrik. Malia: Jurnal Ekonomi Islam, 12(2), 225–242.
Ahmad, M., & Nasution, D. P. (2018). Analisis Kualitatif Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa yang Diberi Pembelajaran Matematika Realistik. Jurnal Gantang, 3(2), 83-95.
Ahmi, A., & Mohamad, R. (2019). Bibliometric Analysis of Global Scientific Literature on Web Accessibility. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, April.
Archambault, E., Campbell, D., & Gingras, Y. dan L. V. (2013). Comparing Bibliometric Statistic Obtained From the Web of Science and scopus. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(July), 1852–1863. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi
Eck, N. J. Van, & Waltman, L. (2014). Measuring Scholarly Impact. In Measuring Scholarly Impact. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10377-8
Effendy, F., Gaffar, V., Hurriyati, R., & Hendrayati, H. (2021). Analisis Bibliometrik Perkembangan Penelitian Penggunaan Pembayaran Seluler Dengan Vosviewer. Jurnal Interkom: Jurnal Publikasi Ilmiah Bidang Teknologi Informasi Dan Komunikasi, 16(1), 10–17. https://doi.org/10.35969/interkom.v16i1.92
Ellegaard, O., & Wallin, J. A. (2015). The bibliometric analysis of scholarly production: How great is the impact? Scientometrics, 105(3), 1809–1831. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-015-1645-z
Glenisson, P., Glänzel, W., Janssens, F., & De Moor, B. (2005). Combining Full Text and Bibliometric Information in Mapping Scientific Disciplines. Information Processing and Management, 41(6), 1548–1572. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2005.03.021
Guz, A. N., & Rushchitsky, J. J. (2009). Scopus: A System for The Evaluation of Scientific Journals. International Applied Mechanics, 45(4), 351–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10778-009-0189-4
Hamad, S., Shah, H., Lei, S., & Ali, M. (2019). Prosumption : Bibliometric Analysis using HistCite and VOSviewer. 1980, 1020–1045. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2018-0696
Harbaugh, A. P., Carter, T. A., Capraro, M. M., & Capraro, R. M. (2008). Quality of Instruction: 19(3), 376–410.
Hendriana, H., & Kadarisma, G. (2019). Self-Efficacy dan Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa SMP. JNPM (Jurnal Nasional Pendidikan Matematika), 3(1), 153. https://doi.org/10.33603/jnpm.v3i1.2033
Hudha, M. N., & Et.al. (2020). Low Carbon Education: A Review and Bibliometric Analysis. European Journal of Educational, 9(1), 319–329. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.9.1.319
Hung, J. L. (2012). Trends of e-learning research from 2000 to 2008: Use of text mining and bibliometrics. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8535.2010.01144.x
Julius, R., Syawal, M., Halim, A., Hadi, N. A., Alias, A. N., Hafiz, M., Khalid, M., Mahfodz, Z., & Ramli, F. F. (2021). Bibliometric Analysis of Research in Mathematics Education using Scopus Database. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(12).
Kadarisma, G. (2016). Improving Students’ Logical Thinking Mathematic Skill Through Learning Cycle 5E and Discovery Learning. Proceeding of 3rd International Conference on Research, Implementation and Education of Mathematics and Science, May, 351.
López-Robles, J. R., Guallar, J., Otegi-Olaso, J. R., & Gamboa-Rosales, N. K. (2019). El Profesional De La Información (Epi): Bibliometric And Thematic Analysis (2006-2017). Profesional de La Informacion, 28(4), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2019.jul.17
Mubarrok, U. S., & Rahmawati, Z. (2020). Analisis Bibliometrik Perkembangan Penelitian Bank Wakaf. Malia (Terakreditasi), 12(1), 17–28. https://doi.org/10.35891/ml.v12i1.1938
Nofrianto, A., Maryuni, N., & Amri, M. A. (2017). Komunikasi Matematis Siswa : Pengaruh Pendekatan Matematika Realistik. 2(2), 113–122.
Novia, F. (2020). Bibliometrik: Analisis Pengujian Hukum Lotka pada Pola Produktivitas Pengarang dan Analisis Pengujian Hukum Zipt pada Abstrak Artikel di Bidang Pendidikan Biologi. 4(2), 32–72.
Syamsiah, Z. M., Amelia, S., & Maarif, S. (2022). Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis: Sebuah Systematic Literature Review dengan Analisis Bibliometrik Menggunakan VOS Viewers. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika (JPM), 8(1), 114–128.
The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, I. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. NCTM.
Waltman, L., Eck, N. J. Van, & Noyons, E. C. M. (2010). A Unified Approach to Mapping and Clustering of Bibliometric Networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
Wichelt, L., & Kearney. (2009). Communication : A Vital Skill of Mathematics Math in the Middle Institute Partnership. Action Research Project, 18(7), 1–32.
Wong, D., & Romano, L. (2018). VOSviewer. 7131, 219–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/07317131.2018.1425352
Zahedi, Z., & Van Eck, N. J. (2014, June). Visualizing readership activity of Mendeley users using VOSviewer. In altmetrics14: Expanding impacts and metrics, Workshop at Web Science Conference (Vol. 1041819).
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
