THE INFLUENCE OF THE GUIDED INQUIRY LEARNING MODEL ON STUDENTS"™ MATHEMATICAL REFLECTIVE THINKING ABILITY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v16i3.93414Keywords:
Effect, Guided Inquiry, Mathematical Reflective Thinking AbilityAbstract
Mathematical reflective thinking ability is a thinking ability that involves the process of connecting existing knowledge with new knowledge to solve problems by identifying problems, evaluating, concluding, and making decisions to find the best solution to the problems faced. Mathematical reflective thinking ability has an important role for teachers and students in mathematics learning that focuses on problem solving. However, in reality, many students still have difficulty reflecting on their thinking processes when solving mathematical problems. Therefore, it is necessary to implement a learning model that actively involves students in activities and focuses on solving mathematical problems, one of which is the guided inquiry model. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the Guided inquiry learning model on students' mathematical reflective thinking abilities. The research method used was a quasi-experimental study. The population in this study were all eighth-grade students of SMP Negeri 7 Bandar Lampung in the even semester of the 2024/2025 academic year with a sample of 30 students in grades VIII.8 and VIII.9 selected using a purposive sampling technique. The research design used was a posttest only control group design. The data in this study were quantitative data obtained from a mathematical reflective thinking ability test. Data analysis in this study used a statistical test, namely the t-test. The results showed that the mathematical reflective thinking ability of students who followed the guided inquiry learning model was higher than the mathematical reflective thinking ability of students who followed conventional learning. Thus, the guided inquiry learning model influenced students' mathematical reflective thinking ability.References
Ananda, R.A , Febrian, Linda, R. T. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Materi Operasi Hitung Pecahan Campuran Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Matematis. Jurnal Gantang, 6(2), 163–168. https://doi.org/10.31629/jg.v6i2.1931
Arum, L., & Wijayanti, P. (2017). Profil Berpikir Reflektif Siswa SMP Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Aljabar Ditinjau Dari Perbedaan Jenis Kelamin. MATHEdunesa, 2(6), 193–202.
Badan Standar, Kurikulum dan Asesmen Pendidikan (BSKAP) Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi. (2022). Capaian pembelajaran tertuang dalam SK BSKAP Nomor 008/H/KR/2022 Tentang Capaian Pembelajaran Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah pada Kurikulum Merdeka. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi.
Badan Standar, Kurikulum dan Asesmen Pendidikan (BSKAP) Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi. 2022. Capaian pembelajaran tertuang dalam SK BSKAP Nomor Nomor 032/H/KRT/ (2024). Capaian Pembelajaran Pada Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini, Jenjang Pendidikan Dasar dan Jenjang Pendidikan Menengah pada Kurikulum Merdeka. Jakarta: Kementerian Pendidikan, Kebudayaan, Riset dan Teknologi.
Dewantara, A. H., & Saraswati, S. (2021). Proses Berpikir Intuitif Siswa Sekolah Dasar Dalam Penyelesaian Masalah Persen. Journal of Primary Education, 2(1), 1–14. https://jurnal.iain-bone.ac.id/index.php/algurfah/index.
Fuady, A. (2016). Berfikir Reflektif Dalam Pembelajaran Matematika. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 1(2), 104–112. DOI: 10.26877/jipmat.v1i2.1236.
Ginanjar, A. Y. (2019). Pentingnya Penguasaan Konsep Matematika Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika di SD. Jurnal Pendidikan Universitas Garut, 13(01), 121–129. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52434/jp.v13i1.822.
Kurniawati, K., Noer, S. H., & Gunowibowo, P. (2019). Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Dan Self Efficacy. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(1), 65–77.
Kemendikbud .(2016). Permendikbud Nomor 22 Tahun 2016 Tentang Standar Proses Pendidikan Dan Menengah. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Lestari, R., Noer, S. H., & Gunowibowo, P. (2019). Pengaruh Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Matematis dan Self Confidence. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Unila, 7(1), 37–50.
Mulyati, S., Nuryatin, A., Pratiwi, R. T., Nisa, A. A., & Suminar, A. (2023). Penerapan Model Guided inquiry Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Dengan Variabel Moderator Motivasi Belajar. Equilibrium: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan dan Ekonomi, 20(02), 223–230. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25134/equi.v20i02.8266.
Nasir, L., Suharna, H., Angkotasan, N., & Abdullah, N. (2022). Proses Berpikir Reflektif Matematis Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Program Linear. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Matematika, 2(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.33387/jpgm.v2i1.4123
OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. PISA OECD Publishing.
Pambudi, D. S., Iskarina, A. D., Oktavianingtyas, E., Susanto, S., & Hobri, H. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Siswa SMP Dalam Memecahkan Masalah Aritmetika Sosial Berdasarkan Perbedaan Jenis Kelamin. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(3), 1926–1940. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v10i3.4036.
Pramudya, P. A., & Safrul. (2022). Analisis Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing terhadap Minat Belajar Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu, 6(5), 8131–8138. https://jbasic.org/index.php/basicedu
Prasetiyo, M. B., & Rosy, B. (2020). Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Sebagai Strategi Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran (JPAP), 9(1), 109–120. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpap.v9n1.p109-120.
Prisila, I. P., Diana Hernawati, Mutfi Ali, & Samuel.A.T. (2021). Korelasi Kemampuan Berpikir Reflektif Terhadap Self-Confidence. Jurnal Metaedukasi, 3(1), 1–8. https://ojs.fkip.ummetro.ac.id/index.php/matematika/article/view/1818.
Sudirah, S. (2020). Penerapan Metode Instruksi Langsung (Direct Instruction) dalam Sistem Pembelajaran Untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa Pada Mata Pelajaran Matematika Kelas 3 SD. ISEJ: Indonesian Science Education Journal, 1(2), 97–108. DOI: https://doi.org/10.62159/isej.v1i2.49.
Sugiyono. 2019. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sund, R. B., & Trowbidge, L. W. (1976). Teaching Science by Inquiry in the Secondary School. Charles E. Merril Publishing Company.
Surbeck, E., Man, E. M., & Mover, J. E. (1991). Assessing Reflective Responses in Journals. Educational Leadership, 48(6), 25–27.
Tisngati, U., & Genarsih, T. (2021). Reflective Thinking Process Of Students In Completing Mathematical Problems Based On Mathematical Reasoning Ability. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1776(1), 1–9. DOI 10.1088/1742-6596/1776/1/012035.
Zarni, Z. (2023). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Inkuiri Terbimbing untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Siswa pada Mata Pelajaran IPA di Kelas V SDN 060/XI Pendung Hiang. Jurnal Ilmiah Dikdaya, 13(2), 380. https://doi.org/10.33087/dikdaya.v13i2.541
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License
