STUDENTS RESPONSE TO THE READABILITY OF POGIL-BASED INTERACTIVE E-MODULE ON HEAT TOPIC

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26418/jpmipa.v17i1.99768

Keywords:

Learning Materials, Learning Media, Module Electronic, Physics Learning, POGIL

Abstract

This study aimed to analyze the readability of a POGIL-based interactive e-module on heat for 12th-grade students. This study is urgent due to the abstract nature of heat concepts in physics and the increasing use of digital learning resources, which require instructional materials that are not only technologically advanced but also readable and pedagogically effective. The research employed a descriptive survey with a quantitative approach, collecting data via a questionnaire designed to assess three main aspects of the e-module: format, language, and content. A purposive sampling technique was employed, selecting 33 students who had previously studied the heat topic and had experience with e-modules. The data obtained were analyzed using a Likert scale to evaluate the effectiveness and practicality of the e-module. The results showed that the e-module received high ratings across all aspects, with an overall average score of 91.89%, categorizing it as “Very Practical.” The format aspect scored 90.06%, indicating that the e-module's design and structure were user-friendly and supported comprehension. The language aspect scored 92.73%, reflecting the clarity and simplicity of the language used. The content aspect scored 92.88%, indicating that the e-module effectively enhanced student engagement and understanding of the material. Overall, the study concludes that the e-module is a highly effective learning resource and is recommended for future instructional use.

References

F. Delita, N. Berutu, and N. Nofrion, “Online learning: the effects of using e-modules on self-efficacy, motivation and learning outcomes,” Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 93–107, Oct. 2022, doi: 10.17718/tojde.1182760.

A. Holisoh, J. Pahamzah, and S. Hidayat, “Literature Review on the Use of Electronic Modules in Independent Learning in Higher Education,” Journal of General Education and Humanities, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 153–164, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.58421/gehu.v4i1.368.

S. Dewi, A. Alfiandra, and S. Safitri, “Enhancing Pancasila Education through Differentiated Learning: The Role of E-Modules Developed with Flip PDF Professional,” AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 4630–4640, Nov. 2024, doi: 10.35445/alishlah.v16i4.5337.

N. Sikumbang, Jasrial, Ridwan, and Rayendra, “Development of E-Modules Integrate with PBL (Problem Base Learning) in High School Physicts Subject Class XI,” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, vol. 11, no. 6, pp. 423–434, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i6.11627.

A. M. Wulandari, E. Handoyo, S. Wardani, B. Subali, and N. Widiarti, “Literature Study of E-Modules Based on Project-Based Learning to Improve Critical Thinking Skills of Students,” Edunesia : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 1039–1054, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.51276/edu.v6i2.1241.

A. W. Ningsih, A. F. Hidayatullah, and Rofi’ah Ndzani Latifatur, “ Development of Biology E-Module Based on POGIL in Virus and Bacteria Material to Train HOTS X Graders of Senior High School,” Bioeduca: Journal of Biology Education, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 105–110, Sep. 2023.

S. Al Neyadi, “Assessing the Effects of POGIL-Based Instruction versus Lecture-Based Instruction on Grade 12 Self-Efficacy and Performance in Circular Motion Unit,” Journal of Ecohumanism, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 1219–1238, Jul. 2024, doi: 10.62754/joe.v3i3.3625.

H. H. Hu and T. D. Shepherd, “Using POGIL to help students learn to program,” ACM Transactions on Computing Education, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1–23, Aug. 2013, doi: 10.1145/2499947.2499950.

B. Samosir, “Implementation of Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning Model Learning (Pogil) on Understanding of Science Concepts, Skills Science Process and Student’s Critical Thinking Ability,” International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 1673–1682, Sep. 2022, doi: 10.11594/ijmaber.03.09.08.

Q. Gao, M. Tong, J. Sun, C. Zhang, Y. Huang, and S. Zhang, “A Study of Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) in the Blended Synchronous Science Classroom,” J Sci Educ Technol, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 103–121, Feb. 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10956-024-10155-3.

F. R. Irsalina, L. Aviyanti, and R. Fredyan, “A rasch model approach to gender-based thermal concept analysis in East Java high schools,” Momentum: Physics Education Journal, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 92–108, Jan. 2025, doi: 10.21067/mpej.v9i1.11007.

R. S. Moog, F. J. Creegan, D. M. Hanson, J. N. Spencer, and A. R. Straumanis, “Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning: POGIL and the POGIL Project,” Metrop Univ, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 41–52, 2006.

E. Toyo, S. D. Aji, and C. Sundaygara, “The Effect of POGIL Model Toward Science Process Skills and Physics Acquisition of Student,” Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 157–163, 2019.

A. Sanova, D. A. Kurniawan, S. M. Husna, and E. Triani, “Analysis of Responses to the Development of E-Modules to Improve Students’ Critical Thinking Skills in Reaction Rate Materials in the Form of Android Applications,” JST (Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi), vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 464–475, Oct. 2024, doi: 10.23887/jstundiksha.v13i3.85758.

A. K. S. Kadir and D. Purwaningsih, “Development of Electronic Modules Based on Collaborative Problem Solving on Buffer Solution Materials,” Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 1115–1123, Mar. 2024, doi: 10.29303/jppipa.v10i3.5794.

N. A. Putri, W. Liliawati, and R. Efendi, “Flipbook E-Module-Assisted 8e Learning Cycle Model on Improving High School Students’ Concept Mastery on Heat and Heat Transfer Material,” Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Teknologi, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 16–28, Jun. 2024, [Online]. Available: http://www.jurnalfkip.unram.ac.id/index.php/JPFT/article/view/6738

R. T. Leinonen, “Improving the learning of thermal physics at university,” Nordic Studies in Science Education, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 123, Apr. 2014, doi: 10.5617/nordina.816.

H. D. Young and R. A. Freedman, University Physics with Modern Physics, 11th edition. San Fransisco: Addison-Wesley Longman, Inc., 2004.

S. R. Simonson, POGIL: An Introduction to Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning for Those Who Wish to Empower Learners. New York: Routledge, 2023. doi: 10.4324/9781003446330.

E. F. Asda, I. W. Dasna, P. Parlan, and S. Suharti, “The role of inquiry learning in enhancing creativity generating ideas from a self-efficacy perspective,” Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1–22, May 2025, doi: 10.29333/ejmste/16276.

C. Huang, “Designing high-quality interactive multimedia learning modules,” Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, vol. 29, no. 2–3, pp. 223–233, Mar. 2005, doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2004.09.017.

M. M. Daghio, G. Fattori, and A. V. Ciardullo, “Assessment of Readability and Learning of Easy-to-Read Educational Health Materials Designed and Written with the Help of Citizens by Means of Two Non-Alternative Methods,” Advances in Health Sciences Education, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 123–132, May 2006, doi: 10.1007/s10459-005-7852-2.

S. Yulando, S. Sutopo, and T. Franklin Chi, “Electronic Module Design and Development: An Interactive Learning,” Am J Educ Res, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 694–698, Oct. 2019, doi: 10.12691/education-7-10-4.

L. T. S. Wahyuni and I. B. P. Arnyana, “E-Module Based on Tri Kaya Parisudha Effectively Improves Science Learning Outcomes,” MIMBAR PGSD Undiksha, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 358–366, Aug. 2022, doi: 10.23887/jjpgsd.v10i2.46733.

F. R. Irsalina, F. F. Andini, and D. Rusdiana, “Development of Learning Media Based on Arduino Load Cell on Pascal’s Law Topic to Improve Students’ Learning Outcomes,” Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 27–44, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.24114/jpf.v14i1.64338.

T. Zheng, M. Ardolino, A. Bacchetti, M. Perona, and M. Zanardini, “The impacts of Industry 4.0: a descriptive survey in the Italian manufacturing sector,” Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, vol. 31, no. 5, pp. 1085–1115, Nov. 2019, doi: 10.1108/JMTM-08-2018-0269.

J. W. Cresswell and J. D. Cresswell, Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, 5th ed. Los Angeles: SAGE, 2018.

M. Sarip, S. Amintarti, and N. H. Utami, “Validitas Dan Keterbacaan Media Ajar E-Booklet Untuk Siswa SMA/MA Materi Keanekaragaman Hayati,” JUPEIS: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial , vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 43–59, Jan. 2022.

S. Akbar, Instrumen Perangkat Pembelajaran, Cetakan keenam. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya Offset, 2022.

R. D. Cahayningrum, M. Nurjayadi, and A. Rahman, “Pengembangan E-Module Kimia Berbasis Pogil (Process Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning) Pada Materi Reaksi Reduksi-Oksidasi Sebagai Sumber Belajar Siswa,” JRPK: Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Kimia, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 59–65, Jul. 2017, doi: 10.21009/JRPK.071.07.

E. Nsabayezu, O. Habimana, W. Nzabalirwa, and F. N. Niyonzima, “Contribution of Activities-Enhanced Rubrics in the Multimedia-Supported Flipped Classroom Approach on Students’ Conceptual Understanding in Organic Chemistry: A Scoping Review,” The International Journal of Technologies in Learning, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 77–112, 2024, doi: 10.18848/2327-0144/CGP/v32i01/77-112.

K. T. Kotsis, “The Language of Physics: Shaping Conceptual Understanding and Scientific Communication,” Bulletin of Language and Literature Studies, vol. 2, no. 2, Jun. 2025, doi: 10.59652/blls.v2i2.581.

A. Alya and D. Purwaningsih, “Development of Interactive e-Modules Based on Socio-Scientific Issues Integrated Micro-Project to Train Students’ Understanding of Concepts and Science Process Skills,” Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, vol. 11, no. 1, p. 75, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.33394/jk.v11i1.13932.

L. Safitri, N. Hidayati, and S. Suryanti, “Integrating Problem-Based Learning into E-Modules : A Development Study with Validation and Student Response Analysis,” Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian dan Kajian Kepustakaan di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran dan Pembelajaran, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 397–409, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.33394/jk.v11i1.14836.

M. Stefanou, G. Stylos, K. Georgopoulos, and K. Kotsis, “Primary Preservice Teachers’ Misconceptions and Reasoning of Thermal Concepts in Everyday Contexts,” The International Journal of Learning in Higher Education, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 127–157, 2023, doi: 10.18848/2327-7955/CGP/v31i01/127-157.

Downloads

Published

2026-02-10