Bibliometric Analysis of Foodborne Pathogen Research in the Year Range 2013-2023 Based on Scopus Web Data
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26418/jft.v6i2.80411Keywords:
analysis, bibliometrics, foodborne, method, pathogenAbstract
Bibliometric analysis is a methodology that can be used to investigate patterns in publications based on data cited from academic literature. This research is conducted to comprehensively analyze selected topics. This paper presents the evolution and structure of the chosen research topic. The goal is to obtain an overview of information about the foodborne pathogen research that has been conducted, with the hope that this information can provide insights and guidance for further research related to foodborne pathogens. This paper is also expected to open up new opportunities for identifying gaps in the analysis of potential innovations in foodborne pathogen research, which can serve as a reference for future studies. Bibliometric literature analysis is centred around the main components using Bibliometrics and VOSviewer. This analysis is based on articles published in Scopus journals from 2013 to 2023. Data extracted from the Scopus web shows an increasing trend year by year, with the United States having the highest number of articles, totalling 3,109, and 22 countries with the lowest number of articles. As for the categories based on the source of information, they can be grouped into journals, books, book series, conference proceedings, and undefined sources. The visualization network shows five different colours, with each colour representing the number of clades generated from the analysis. Based on this, it can be concluded that a significant amount of research related to foodborne pathogens has been conducted, with many studies focusing on pathogens in animals, food microbiology, food control, antibiotic resistance, and pathogens in non-human subjects.References
Aparicio, G., Iturralde, T., & Maseda, A. (2020). A holistic bibliometric overview of the student engagement research field. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(4), 540–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877x.2020.1795092
Hallinger, P., & KovaÄević, J. (2019). A Bibliometric Review of Research on Educational Administration: Science Mapping the Literature, 1960 to 2018. Review of Educational Research, 89(3), 335–369. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654319830380
Kasaraneni, H., & Rosaline, S. (2022). Automatic Merging of Scopus and Web of Science Data for Simplified and Effective Bibliometric Analysis. Annals of Data Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40745-022-00438-0
Mengliye, B. R., Hamroyeva, Sh., & Abdullayeva, O. (2023). Scopus-based bibliometric analysis on corpus linguistics for the period of 2017-2021. E3S Web of Conferences, 413, 03008. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202341303008
Gazali, N., & Saad, N. (2023). Bibliometric analysis of leadership and physical education based on Scopus data. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE), 12(3), 1174. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i3.22922
Wakil, G. K. (2020). Audit Quality Research: A Bibliometric Analysis Using Scopus Database. Journal of Advanced Research in Dynamical and Control Systems, 12(3), 441–450. https://doi.org/10.5373/jardcs/v12i3/20201212
Koo, M. (2017). A bibliometric analysis of two decades of aromatherapy research. BMC Research Notes, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-016-2371-1
Yang, G.-Y., Wang, L.-Q., Ren, J., Zhang, Y., Li, M.-L., Zhu, Y.-T., Luo, J., Cheng, Y.-J., Li, W.-Y., Wayne, P. M., & Liu, J.-P. (2015). Evidence Base of Clinical Studies on Tai Chi: A Bibliometric Analysis. PLOS ONE, 10(3), e0120655. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0120655
Serenko, A., & Bontis, N. (2013). The intellectual core and impact of the knowledge management academic discipline. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(1), 137–155. https://doi.org/10.1108/13673271311300840
Sun, Y., & Wang, Q. (2022). Mapping the Field of Register Studies: A Bibliometric Analysis. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4218799
Koukopoulos, A., & Neimeyer, R. A. (2023). Prolonged grief disorder: A bibliometric analysis. Death Studies, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/07481187.2023.2196734
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 FoodTech: Jurnal Teknologi Pangan

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).