Analisis Trend Senam Artistik Lantai Putri Pada Sea Games 2022 Vietnam Melalui Digital Video Material

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26418/jilo.v5i2.55536

Keywords:

Gymnastics, Floor exercise, Element content, Element group, Difficulty

Abstract

Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui trend senam lantai final senam putri (8 pesenam) di Sea Games 2022 melalui materi video digital. Rekaman video final lantai dikumpulkan melalui youtube Entertainment-Mediacorp . Hasil final lantai telah dicek oleh ke tiga juri. Pada 8 pesenam yang mengikuti final lantai, untuk   memenuhi D-score gerakan yang banyak dilakukan   adalah kelompok gerakan pada grup satu sebanyak   33 gerakan, dengan dominasi gerakan gymnastic leaps, jumps dan hops, serta turn. Pada   double salto tuck di udara dilakukan oleh pesenam sebanyak 7 pesenam, Salto fwd stretched with 1/1 twist (360 °) sebanyak 7 pesenam, Leap fwd with leg change sebanyak 7 pesenam, Switch leap with ½ turn (180 °) in flight phase sebanyak 6 pesenam. Hasil ini memberikan informasi dimana muncul kecenderungan nilai skor D yang dimiliki oleh para atlet jaraknya lebih besar daripada skor E.

References

Aleixio, I. M., & Nunomura, M. (2018). Age perception and sports career in the women’s artistic gymnastics. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 10, 381–389.

Arkaev, L. (2006). Gymnastics—How to Create Champions.

Atikovic, A., Kalinski, S., Bijelic, S., & Vukadinović, N. (2011). ANALYSIS RESULTS JUDGING WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS IN MEN’S ARTISTIC GYMNASTICS IN THE LONDON 2009 YEAR. Sportlogia, 7. https://doi.org/10.5550/sgia.110702.en.095A

Atikovic, A., Kalinski, S., & Äuk, I. (2017). Age trends in artistic gymnastic across world championships and the olympic games from 2003 to 2016. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 9, 251–263.

Bradshaw, E., & Hume, P. (2012). Biomechanical approaches to identify and quantify injury mechanisms and risk factors in women’s artistic gymnastics. Sports Biomechanics / International Society of Biomechanics in Sports, 11, 324–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2011.650186

Bucar, M., Äuk, I., Pajek, J., KovaÄ, M., & LeskoÅ¡ek, B. (2013). Is the Quality of Judging in Women Artistic Gymnastics Equivalent at Major Competitions of Different Levels? Journal of Human Kinetics, 37, 173–181. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2013-0038

Corlaci, I. (2018). Typical Contests in Men’s Artistic Gymnastics in an Olympic Cycle (p. 331). https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.03.43

Äuk, I., Fink, H., & LeskoÅ¡ek, B. (2012). Modeling the final score in artistic gymnastics by different weights of difficulty and execution. 4.

Äuk, I., & Forbes, W. (2022). HOW APPARATUS DIFFICULTY SCORES AFFECT ALL AROUND RESULTS IN MEN’S ARTISTIC GYMNASTICS.

Donghwa, K., & ì´ìˆ˜ê·¼. (2017). Analysis of exercise content on the men’s floor exercise in the artistic gymnastics world championships- 1 to 12 team center to the group qualification game -. https://doi.org/10.24985/kjss.2017.28.4.1073

Donti, O., Donti, A., & Theodorakou, K. (2014). A review on the changes of the evaluation system affecting artistic gymnasts’ basic preparation: The aspect of choreography preparation. Science of Gymnastics, 6, 63–72.

Flemons, M., Diffey, F., & Cunliffe, D. (2018). The Role of PETE in Developing and Sustaining Physical Literacy Informed Practitioners. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2018-0128

Han, Y.-S. (2018). Trend Analysis of Men’s Gymnastics on Floor Exercise in the 2018 Asian Games through Digital Video Materials. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(12), 619–624. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.12.619

Kalinski, S., Atikovic, A., Jelaska, I., & Milić, M. (2016). Performance analysis of female gymnasts’ vault in elite competitions from 2008 to 2015. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 8, 109–123.

Kalinski, S. D., Kezic, A., & Jelaska, I. (2021). Choreography Strategies in Women’s Artistic Gymnastics Floor Routines across Five Olympic Games. Sport Mont, 7.

Kalinski, S., Jelaska, P., & Atikovic, A. (2018). Relative age effect among olympian gymnasts. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 10, 493–507.

Kerr, R., & Obel, C. (2014). The Disappearance of the Perfect 10: Evaluating Rule Changes in Women’s Artistic Gymnastics. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 32, 318–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2014.974031

Leskosek, B. (2013). Trends in E and D scores and their influence on final results of male gymnasts at European championships 2005-2011.

Mack, M., Bryan, M., Heyer, G., & Heinen, T. (2019). Modeling Judges’ Scores in Artistic Gymnastics. The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 12, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2174/1875399X01912010001

Oliveira, M., Lima, L., & Costa3, A. (2022). WOMEN’S ARTISTIC GYMNASTICS ROUTINE COMPOSITION AT RIO 2016 OLYMPIC GAMES: A TECHNICAL ANALYSIS OF BALANCE Aleixio, I. M., & Nunomura, M. (2018). Age perception and sports career in the women’s artistic gymnastics. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 10, 381–389.

Arkaev, L. (2006). Gymnastics—How to Create Champions.

Atikovic, A., Kalinski, S., Bijelic, S., & Vukadinović, N. (2011). ANALYSIS RESULTS JUDGING WORLD CHAMPIONSHIPS IN MEN’S ARTISTIC GYMNASTICS IN THE LONDON 2009 YEAR. Sportlogia, 7. https://doi.org/10.5550/sgia.110702.en.095A

Atikovic, A., Kalinski, S., & Äuk, I. (2017). Age trends in artistic gymnastic across world championships and the olympic games from 2003 to 2016. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 9, 251–263.

Bradshaw, E., & Hume, P. (2012). Biomechanical approaches to identify and quantify injury mechanisms and risk factors in women’s artistic gymnastics. Sports Biomechanics / International Society of Biomechanics in Sports, 11, 324–341. https://doi.org/10.1080/14763141.2011.650186

Bucar, M., Äuk, I., Pajek, J., KovaÄ, M., & LeskoÅ¡ek, B. (2013). Is the Quality of Judging in Women Artistic Gymnastics Equivalent at Major Competitions of Different Levels? Journal of Human Kinetics, 37, 173–181. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2013-0038

Corlaci, I. (2018). Typical Contests in Men’s Artistic Gymnastics in an Olympic Cycle (p. 331). https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2018.03.43

Äuk, I., Fink, H., & LeskoÅ¡ek, B. (2012). Modeling the final score in artistic gymnastics by different weights of difficulty and execution. 4.

Äuk, I., & Forbes, W. (2022). HOW APPARATUS DIFFICULTY SCORES AFFECT ALL AROUND RESULTS IN MEN’S ARTISTIC GYMNASTICS.

Donghwa, K., & ì´ìˆ˜ê·¼. (2017). Analysis of exercise content on the men’s floor exercise in the artistic gymnastics world championships- 1 to 12 team center to the group qualification game -. https://doi.org/10.24985/kjss.2017.28.4.1073

Donti, O., Donti, A., & Theodorakou, K. (2014). A review on the changes of the evaluation system affecting artistic gymnasts’ basic preparation: The aspect of choreography preparation. Science of Gymnastics, 6, 63–72.

Flemons, M., Diffey, F., & Cunliffe, D. (2018). The Role of PETE in Developing and Sustaining Physical Literacy Informed Practitioners. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 37, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1123/jtpe.2018-0128

Han, Y.-S. (2018). Trend Analysis of Men’s Gymnastics on Floor Exercise in the 2018 Asian Games through Digital Video Materials. Journal of Digital Convergence, 16(12), 619–624. https://doi.org/10.14400/JDC.2018.16.12.619

Kalinski, S., Atikovic, A., Jelaska, I., & Milić, M. (2016). Performance analysis of female gymnasts’ vault in elite competitions from 2008 to 2015. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 8, 109–123.

Kalinski, S. D., Kezic, A., & Jelaska, I. (2021). Choreography Strategies in Women’s Artistic Gymnastics Floor Routines across Five Olympic Games. Sport Mont, 7.

Kalinski, S., Jelaska, P., & Atikovic, A. (2018). Relative age effect among olympian gymnasts. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 10, 493–507.

Kerr, R., & Obel, C. (2014). The Disappearance of the Perfect 10: Evaluating Rule Changes in Women’s Artistic Gymnastics. The International Journal of the History of Sport, 32, 318–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/09523367.2014.974031

Leskosek, B. (2013). Trends in E and D scores and their influence on final results of male gymnasts at European championships 2005-2011.

Mack, M., Bryan, M., Heyer, G., & Heinen, T. (2019). Modeling Judges’ Scores in Artistic Gymnastics. The Open Sports Sciences Journal, 12, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.2174/1875399X01912010001

Oliveira, M., Lima, L., & Costa3, A. (2022). WOMEN’S ARTISTIC GYMNASTICS ROUTINE COMPOSITION AT RIO 2016 OLYMPIC GAMES: A TECHNICAL ANALYSIS OF BALANCE BEAM AND FLOOR EXERCISE ROUTINES. Science of Gymnastics Journal, 14, 17–28. https://doi.org/10.52165/sgj.14.1.17-28

Pastor, F. S. (2003). Gimnasia artística: Los fundamentos de la técnica. Biblioteca Nueva.

Pizzera, A. (2012). Gymnastic Judges Benefit From Their Own Motor Experience as Gymnasts. Res Q Exerc Sport, 83, 603–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2012.10599887

Rohleder, J., & Vogt, T. (2019). Changes in Floor Exercise Characteristics in World Elite Male Gymnasts. Journal of Human Kinetics, 2019, 291–300. https://doi.org/10.2478/hukin-2018-0083

Scerpella, T. A., Davenport, M., Morganti, C. M., Kanaley, J. A., & Johnson, L. M. (2003). Dose related association of impact activity and bone mineral density in pre-pubertal girls. Calcified Tissue International, 72(1), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00223-001-1131-x

Vuillerme, N., Teasdale, N., & Nougier, V. (2001). The effect of expertise in gymnastics on proprioceptive sensory integration in human subjects. Neuroscience Letters, 311(2), 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-3940(01)02147-4

Zanker, C. L., Osborne, C., Cooke, C. B., Oldroyd, B., & Truscott, J. G. (2004). Bone density, body composition and menstrual history of sedentary female former gymnasts, aged 20-32 years. Osteoporosis International: A Journal Established as Result of Cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 15(2), 145–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-003-1524-y

Downloads

Published

2022-10-26

Issue

Section

RESEARCH ARTICLES