INVESTIGATING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CULTURAL INTELLIGENCE AND STUDENT"™S LISTENING COMPREHENSION
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26418/jeep.v3i1.50221Abstract
Student"™s listening comprehension could be affected by several factors, one of the factors is student"™s cultural intelligence. It is an ability to grasp and reason correctly any problem as education, government, business, and academic research. This study aimed to find out the correlation between students"™ cultural intelligence and their listening comprehension at first semester students of English Department Universitas Riau Kepulauan in the academic year of 2020/2021. The data of the research were students"™ cultural intelligence scores derived from cultural intelligence scale and student"™s listening comprehension from IELTS listening tests. The population of the research were 28 students of first semester of English Department of Universitas Riau Kepulauan. Before testing the hypothesis, a normality test was conducted by using saphiro wilk to ensure that the data were in normal distribution. The data of cultural intelligence had a significance value of 0.397 and 0.372 for listening comprehension which is bigger than 0.05 with the degree of freedom 28. Therefore, it can be concluded that the data of listening comprehension and cultural intelligence were normal. After conducting the hypothesis, it was found out that rcalculated(0.217) is lower than rtable(0.374). The finding of the study concluded that there was no significant correlation between students"™ cultural intelligence and students"™ listening comprehension. However, the positive correlation implied that possessing higher cultural intelligence might be beneficial for student"™s listening comprehension.
References
Ahmadian E, Amirpour M. (2018). The Effect of Cultural Intelligence on Communication skills. Journal of Fundamentals of Mental Health 2018 Nov-Dec; 20(6): 429-38.
Arikunto, S. (2014). Prosedur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta
Ang S & Dyne L V (2008) Handbook of Cultural Intelligence Theory, measurement, and applications. London: M.E. Sharpe, Inc.
Aydin. E (2019) The Effect of Cultural Intelligence and Creative Thinking on the Practical Technical Capabilities of Trabzon University Physical Education Students. Asian Journal of Education and Training Vol. 5, No. 2, 392-396, 2019.
Brown, H. D. (2000) Language Assessment Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Pearson Education
Brown, H.D. (2003). Teaching by Principles: An Interactive Approach to Language Pedagogy (2nd Ed). New York: Longman
Brown, S. (2006) Teaching Listening. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Earley, P. Christopher, and Soon Ang. (2003). Cultural Intelligence: Individual Interactions across Cultures. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
Emzir. (2008). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers
Ghoonsooly, B., et al. (2013). Cultural Intelligence in Foreign Language Learning Context. Cultus Journal (6), pp. 47-68. Retrieved from http://www.cultusjournal.com/files/Archives/ghonsooly_et_al.pdf
Gilakjani, A.P & Sabouri, N.B. (2016). Learners’ Listening Comprehension Difficulties in English Language Learning: A Literature Review. English Language Teaching Vol. 9 No. 6 pp. 123-133
Koc, K. & Turan, M.B. (2018). The Impact of Cultural Intelligence on Social Skills among University Students. Journal of Education and Learning. Vol. 7, No. 6 pp. 241-249
Kothari, C.R. (2004). Research Methodology Methods and Techniques (Second Revised Edition). New Delhi: New Age International Publisher
Lauder, A. (2008). The Status and Function of English in Indonesia: A Review of Key Factors. Makara Sosial Humaniora, Vo. 12, No.1 pp. 9-20
Mahasneh, A.M., Gazoa A.M, & Al-Adamat, O.A. (2019). Cultural Intelligence of Jordan Teachers and University Students from the Hashemite University: Comparative Study. European Journal of Contemporary Education,8(2), pp.303-314
Mappiase, S.S., & Sihas, A.J.B. (2014). Evaluation of English as a Foreign Language and Its Curriculum in Indonesia: A Review. English Language Teaching; Vol. 7, No. 10; pp. 113-122
Muijs, D. (2004). Doing Quantitative Research in Education with SPSS. London: Sage Publication
Mundir. (2012). Statistik Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar
Nation I. S. P & Newton, J. (2009). Teaching ESL/ EFL Listening and Speaking. New York: Routledge
Rafie, et al. (2016). An Investigation of the Relationship between Iranian EFL Learners’ Cultural Intelligence and Their Performance on the IELTS Listening Modules. Advances in Language and Literary Studies ISSN: 2203-4714 Vol. 7 No. 3, pp. 13-20
Razali, Normadiah Mohd, & Wah, Y.B. 2011. Power Comparison of Shapiro Wilk, Kolmogorov Smirnov and Anderson Darling Tests. Journal of Statistical Modeling and Analytics. Vol. 2 No.1 pp 21-33
Richards. J. C. (2008). Teaching Listening and Speaking. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Schmidt, F., & Hunter, J. (2000). Select on Intelligence. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Principles. Oxford: Blackwell
Siregar, S. (2013). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif. Jakarta: Kencana
Stangor, C. (2010). Research Method for the Behavioral Sciences. Stamford: Cengage Learning
Sugiyono. (2012). Statistika untuk Penelitian. Bandung: Alfabeta
Taylor, S. & Osland, J.S. (2003). The Impact of Intercultural Communication on Global Organizational Learning. Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge Management. MA: Blackwell Publishing
Vural, M. and Peker, A.T. (2019). Study on Relationship between Cultural Intelligence Level and Academic Self-Efficacy of Undergrads. Asian Journal of Education and Training Vol. 5. No. 2, 335-342
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Journal of English Education Program
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright aims to protect the specific way the article has been written to describe an experiment and the results. Journal of English Education Program (JEEP) is committed to its authors to protect and defend their work and their reputation and takes allegations of infringement, plagiarism, ethical disputes, and fraud very seriously. Under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), author(s) retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication (online and print) with the work simultaneously. We use the ShareAlike (SA) component in addition to the Attribution (BY) and NonCommercial (NC) components, as follows:
BY (attribution): Users are allowed to share, distribute, and redistribute the published article in any medium or format, with identification of the authors and its initial publication in this journal. Authors are encouraged to post and distribute their articles immediately after publication (e.g., institutional or public repositories, personal websites). Authors are allowed to enter into additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published article and an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
NC (non-commercial): Users are not allowed to use the article commercially without the permission of the authors. Authors agree explicitly that the published article is indexed worldwide in databases, repositories, and indexation services, even if these services operate on a commercial basis. Authors grant Journal of English Education Program (JEEP) explicit the right to include the published articles in databases, repositories, and indexation services.
SA (ShareAlike): If user(s) remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).
