A Syntactic Analysis on the Constituents of Noun Phrases Found in the Tale Cinderella
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26418/jeep.v5i2.72348Keywords:
English syntax, constituents, constituent parts, noun phrases, sequential orderingAbstract
This study examines English syntax, which is concerned with the study of the ordering of components or constituents in phrases and sentences. The spotlight of investigation was directed toward the ordering of the constituents of noun phrases found in the tale Cinderella. The noun phrases found in the tale were broken down into their constituent parts for two reasons. The first is to reveal the sequential ordering of constituents in noun phrases. Do all noun phrases in the tale follow the following sequential ordering: pre-modifiers + head noun + post=modifiers? Do pre-modifiers consist of determiners and adjectives? What constituents can these determinants be broken into? Do the adjectives consist of one single adjective or a series of adjectives? Do post-modifiers consist of prepositional phrases and relative clauses? How many prepositional phrases did the writer use to post-modify a head noun? How many relative clauses did the writer use to post modify the head noun? Did the writer place prepositional phrases before or after the relative clauses? Are relative clauses reduced or non-reduced in nature? Second, to reveal the types of noun phrases used by the writer of the tale"”basic or complex noun phrases. Are most noun phrases used by the writer basic or complex in nature? To attain the research objectives mentioned above, a descriptive method was used. This method attempts to describe and interpret the types and sequential ordering of the constituent parts of noun phrases found in the tale Cinderella.References
Allan, R. J. (2012). Clause intertwining and word order in Ancient Greek. Journal of Greek Linguistics, 12(1), 5-28. https://doi.org/10.1163/156658412x649733
Choi, T. H., & Ng, K. W. (2015). Re-visioning English language arts practices and writing outcomes through the remaking of Cinderella. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 14(3), 366-386. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ETPC-04-2015-0027
Danes, F. (1971). On linguistic strata (levels). Travaux linguistiques de Prague, (4), 127-143.
De la Rochère, M. H. D. (2016). Cinderella across cultures: New directions and interdisciplinary perspectives. Wayne State University Press.
Deane, P. (2020). Building and justifying interpretations of texts: A key practice in the English language arts. ETS Research Report Series, 2020(1), 1-53. https://doi.org/10.1002/ets2.12304
Dugdale, E. (2011). Lingua Latina, lingua mea: Creative composition in beginning latin. Teaching Classical Languages, 3(1), 1-23. https://tcl.camws.org/sites/default/files/Dugdale_0.pdf
Halim, A. (2018, July). Pedagogical Implication of a Short Story: Language and Local Wisdom. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 175, No. 1, p. 012152). IOP Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/175/1/012152
Halliday, M. A. (2005). On matter and meaning: The two realms of human experience. Linguistics & the Human Sciences, 1(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.1558/lhs.2005.1.1.59
Koushki, A. L. (2019). Engaging English learners through literature, fairy tales, and drama. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 8(2), 138-144. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.8n.2p.138
Lee, Y. J. (2022). What today’s children read from “happily ever after†Cinderella stories. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 17(1), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554480X.2020.1781641
Lestari, T. (2012). An analysis of slang words found in Another Cinderella Story movie (Doctoral dissertation, PBI-FKIP).
Manukyan, A. M., & Durgaryan, A. M. (2019). Developing speaking skills through fairy tales in elementary school. Science Review, (3 (20), 25-29. https://dx.doi.org/10.31435/rsglobal_sr/31032019/6384
Richardson, J. D., Dalton, S. G., Greenslade, K. J., Jacks, A., Haley, K. L., & Adams, J. (2021). Main concept, sequencing, and story grammar analyses of Cinderella narratives in a large sample of persons with aphasia. Brain Sciences, 11(1), 110. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11010110
Saxby, G. (2022). Searching for a happily ever after: using fairy tales in primary classrooms to explore gender, subjectivity and the life-worlds of young people. The Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 45(2), 219-232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44020-022-00017-z
Sørensen, M. L. S. (2013). Gender archaeology. John Wiley & Sons.
Stephens, J., & McCallum, R. (2013). Retelling stories, framing culture: traditional story and metanarratives in children's literature. Routledge.
Tatsuki, D. H. (2016). How to Teach Narratives: A Survey of Approaches. ç ”ç©¶å¹´, 54, 5-29.
Van Valin, R. D., & LaPolla, R. J. (1997). Syntax: Structure, meaning, and function. Cambridge University Press.
Wang, C. (2018). The syntax of le in Mandarin Chinese (Doctoral dissertation, Queen Mary University of London).
Widiarti, S. (2017). Error analysis on the use of noun phrases in descriptive writing at the eleventh-grade student of MAN 2 Palembang (Doctoral dissertation, UIN Raden Fatah Palembang).
Xu, H., Zhang, Z., Wu, L., & Wang, C. J. (2019). The Cinderella Complex: Word embeddings reveal gender stereotypes in movies and books. PloS one, 14(11), e0225385. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0225385
Yang, C. (2022). Systematicity and arbitrariness in language. In The Oxford Handbook of the Mental Lexicon.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of English Education Program

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright aims to protect the specific way the article has been written to describe an experiment and the results. Journal of English Education Program (JEEP) is committed to its authors to protect and defend their work and their reputation and takes allegations of infringement, plagiarism, ethical disputes, and fraud very seriously. Under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), author(s) retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication (online and print) with the work simultaneously. We use the ShareAlike (SA) component in addition to the Attribution (BY) and NonCommercial (NC) components, as follows:
BY (attribution): Users are allowed to share, distribute, and redistribute the published article in any medium or format, with identification of the authors and its initial publication in this journal. Authors are encouraged to post and distribute their articles immediately after publication (e.g., institutional or public repositories, personal websites). Authors are allowed to enter into additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published article and an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
NC (non-commercial): Users are not allowed to use the article commercially without the permission of the authors. Authors agree explicitly that the published article is indexed worldwide in databases, repositories, and indexation services, even if these services operate on a commercial basis. Authors grant Journal of English Education Program (JEEP) explicit the right to include the published articles in databases, repositories, and indexation services.
SA (ShareAlike): If user(s) remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).