Perception and Problem of English Pre-service Teachers in Applying Merdeka Belajar Curriculum During Teaching Practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.26418/jeep.v5i1.71757Abstract
Curriculum is updated according to the era's demands which aims at actualizing qualified human resources. The great concept of the curriculum will be superfluous without the teachers"™ role. The objective of this research is to examine English preservice teachers"™ perceptions and problems they encounter in understanding and implementing the new curriculum during their teaching practice. Ten English preservice teachers who completed their teaching practice took part in this research. They were assigned to schools that implement the Merdeka Belajar curriculum. Since the data was gathered and analyzed in two ways, this research is a mixed-method study. The findings of the study revealed that English preservice teachers have a negative perception of understanding and implementing the Merdeka Belajar curriculum in their teaching practice, incapability in designing flow of learning objectives and teaching modules, incapability to conduct differential learning, lack of knowledge on how to integrate Profil Pelajar Pancasila into teaching-learning process contributes to the negative perception of English Pre-Service Teacher. Additionally, the problem was made worse because the university did not properly prepare English pre-service teachers for the latest curriculum.
References
Ahid, N., & Sufirmansyah, S. (2022). The implementation of Merdeka Belajar policy in East Java. Didaktika Religia: Journal of Islamic Education, 10(1), 149–168. http://repository.unj.ac.id/724/.
Akinoğlu, O. (2017). Pre-service teachers’ metaphorical perceptions regarding the concept of curriculum. International Journal of Instruction, 10(2), 263–278. https://doi.org/10.12973/iji.2017.10217a
Astungkoro, R. (2022). Kurikulum prototipe menjadi kurikulum merdeka. Republika. https://www.republika.co.id/berita/r74zd4380/kurikulum-prototipe-menjadi-kurikulum-merdeka
Bada, A. A. (2022). Effectiveness of brain-based teaching strategy on students’ achievement and score levels in heat energy. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 3(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.46843/jiecr.v3i1.45
Bahar, H., & Herli, Sundi, V. (2020). Merdeka belajar untuk kembalikan pendidikan pada khittahnya. PROSIDING SAMASTA Seminar Nasional Bahasa Dan Sastra Indonesia, 115–122.
Cahya, N., & Syafrizal, S. (2022). The integrating local wisdom in english learning to improve Pancasila’s Student profile. MENDIDIK: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan dan Pengabdian, 8(2), 216–221. https://doi.org/10.30653/003.202282.228
Digna, D., & Widyasari, C. (2023). Teachers’ perceptions of differentiated learning in Merdeka Curriculum in elementary schools. International Journal of Elementary Education, 7(2), 255–262. https://doi.org/10.23887/ijee.v7i2.54770
Faiz, A., Parhan, M., & Ananda, R. (2022). Paradigma baru dalam kurikulum prototipe. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 4(1), 1544–1550. https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i1.2410
Fakhrunnisa, S. A. (2021, December). Pre-service English teachers’ problems and strategies in designing lesson plan based on 2013 Curriculum (K-13). In Bogor English Student and Teacher (BEST) Conference (Vol. 3, pp. 123-129).
Fathurrahman, F., Arifin, B. S., Muhyi‎, A., & Huda, M. (2022). The influence of school management on the implementation of the Merdeka Belajar Curriculum. AL-TANZIM: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam, 6(4), 1274–1286. https://doi.org/10.33650/al-tanzim.v6i4.3461
Hadi, A., Marniati, M., Ngindana, R., Kurdi, M. S., Kurdi, M. S., & Fauziah, F. (2023). New paradigm of Merdeka Belajar curriculum in schools. AL-ISHLAH: Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(2), 1497–1510. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v15i2.3126
Indrawati, I. (2018). Improving Tadris Bahasa Inggris students’ competency of curriculum development in language education through investigating SMU teachers’ perceptions on the implementation of 2013 Curriculum. Tarbawy: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 5(2), 198–210. https://doi.org/10.32923/tarbawy.v5i2.837
Ismail, S. A. A. (2011). Student teachers' microteaching experiences in a preservice English teacher education program. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2(5), 1043–1051. https://doi.org/10.4304/jltr.2.5.1043-1051
Jayanti, M. R. (2018). Challenges faced by English language pre-service teachers in 2013 Curriculum implementation. https://repository.usd.ac.id/30938/2/141214038_full.pdf
Kemendikbud, B. (2019). Pendidikan di Indonesia belajar dari hasil PISA 2018. Pusat Penilaian Pendidikan Balitbang KEMENDIKBUD, 021, 1–206. http://repositori.kemdikbud.go.id/id/eprint/16742
Komariah, E., Nurweni, A., & Kadaryanto, B. (2022). Penguatan kompetensi profesi guru bahasa inggris tingkat SMP di Bandar Lampung dalam penerapan kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. Education Language and Arts (ELA), 1(2 September), 112-119.
Lestiyani, P. (2020). Analisis persepsi civitas akademika terhadap konsep Merdeka Belajar menyongsong era industri 5.0. Jurnal Kependidikan: Jurnal Hasil Penelitian Dan Kajian Kepustakaan Di Bidang Pendidikan, Pengajaran Dan Pembelajaran, 6(3), 365. https://doi.org/10.33394/jk.v6i3.2913
Mathura, P. (2019). Teachers’ perspectives on a curriculum change: A Trinidad and Tobago case study. International Journal of Innovative Business Strategies, 5(1), 252–263. https://doi.org/10.20533/ijibs.2046.3626.2019.0035
Mustagfiroh, S. (2020). Konsep “Merdeka Belajar†Perspektif aliran progresivisme di perguruan tinggi. Jurnal Studi Guru dan Pembelajaran, 3(1), 141–147.
Ningsih, A. W., Sihombing, P. S. R., Silalahi, D. E., Herman, & Purba, L. (2021). Students’ perception towards the ose of ICT in efl learning at eleventh grade SMA Negeri 1 Dolok Batu Nanggar. Education and Human Development Journal, 6(2), 24–36. https://doi.org/10.33086/ehdj.v6i3
Nurindah, L., Fitriana, L., Ahid, N., Prasetiyo, G. E., & Daratista, I. (2022). Kebijakan pokok dan strategi implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar di Indonesia. Journal On Teacher Education, 4(2), 1505–1511.
Pertiwi, A. K., & Pusparini, R. (2021). Vocational high school English teachers’ perspectives on “Merdeka Belajar†curriculum. Edukatif: Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(5), 1982–1992. https://edukatif.org/index.php/edukatif/article/view/672
Prakoso, B. H., Ramdani, Z., & Rahmah, B. (2021). Teacher’s perception on Merdeka Belajar policy. Indonesian Journal of Educational Assessment, 3(2). https://doi.org/10.26499/ijea.v3i2.84
Pratikno, Y., Hermawan, E., & Arifin, A. L. (2022). Human resource ‘Kurikulum Merdeka’ from design to implementation in the school: What worked and what not in Indonesian education. Jurnal Iqra’: Kajian Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(1), 326–343. https://journal.iaimnumetrolampung.ac.id/index.php/ji/article/view/1708
Retnawati, E. (2019). Efforts to support and expand the use of educational technology as a means of delivering learning. IJIET (International Journal of Indonesian Education and Teaching), 3(1), 128-137.
Tridiana, R., & Rizal, F. (2020). Keterampilan guru abad 21 di Sekolah Menengah Kejuruan (SMK). Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 4(2), 221–231. https://ejournal.undiksha.ac.id/index.php/JIPP/article/viewFile/25268/15440
Turgut, R., Sahin, E. A., & Huerta, M. (2016). Changes in preservice teachers’ perceptions of preparedness to teach English Language Learners (ELLs) in mainstream classrooms. Journal of Ethnographic & Qualitative Research, 10(4), 291–305. http://proxy.binghamton.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=a9h&AN=119849268&site=ehost-live
Wahyuni, S., Fitriyah, I., & Hasanah, I. I. (2023). The implementation of Merdeka Belajar Curriculum at English Department of Indonesian Universities. JEELS, 10(2), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.30762/jeels.v10i2.Submission
Wijaya, K. F. (2022). Investigating Indonesian EFL teachers’ perceptions on the integration of ICT in English language learning. ELTR Journal, 6(2), 72–85. https://doi.org/10.37147/eltr.v6i2.123
Yamin, M., & Syahrir, S. (2020). Pembangunan pendidikan Merdeka Belajar (Telaah metode pembelajaran). Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 6(1), 126–136. https://doi.org/10.36312/jime.v6i1.1121
Downloads
Additional Files
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of English Education Program

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Copyright aims to protect the specific way the article has been written to describe an experiment and the results. Journal of English Education Program (JEEP) is committed to its authors to protect and defend their work and their reputation and takes allegations of infringement, plagiarism, ethical disputes, and fraud very seriously. Under the terms of the Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0), author(s) retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication (online and print) with the work simultaneously. We use the ShareAlike (SA) component in addition to the Attribution (BY) and NonCommercial (NC) components, as follows:
BY (attribution): Users are allowed to share, distribute, and redistribute the published article in any medium or format, with identification of the authors and its initial publication in this journal. Authors are encouraged to post and distribute their articles immediately after publication (e.g., institutional or public repositories, personal websites). Authors are allowed to enter into additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the published article and an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
NC (non-commercial): Users are not allowed to use the article commercially without the permission of the authors. Authors agree explicitly that the published article is indexed worldwide in databases, repositories, and indexation services, even if these services operate on a commercial basis. Authors grant Journal of English Education Program (JEEP) explicit the right to include the published articles in databases, repositories, and indexation services.
SA (ShareAlike): If user(s) remix, transform, or build upon the material, they must distribute their contributions under the same license as the original (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0).