THE USE OF WHAT COMES NEXT TECHNIQUE (WCNT) TO TEACH ACTION VERBS

Authors

  • Irfan Agung Wiranto Tanjungpura University
  • Yohanes Gatot Sutapa Tanjungpura University
  • Eusabinus Bunau

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26418/jeep.v1i2.40355

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to know whether What Comes Next technique affected significantly on learners’ action verbs achievement and to know the effect size of the technique. The form of this research is pre-experimental study with one group pretest and posttest design. The population was all the eleventh grade learners of SMA Negeri 3 Pontianak. By using cluster random sampling technique, the sample was XI Science 6 class consisted of 33 learners. The data collection technique was measurement technique and the tool of data collection was a test consisted of 25 items in the form of multiple choice. The result of the T-test was 12.25. It was higher than t-critical score (12.25 > 2.03). This indicated that the null hypothesis (H0) was rejected and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) was accepted, meaning that What Comes Next Technique affect significantly in teaching vocabulary for the eleventh grade learners in SMA Negeri 3 Pontianak in the academic year of 2019/2020. The score of the effect size of the treatment was 2.08 and classed as “Strong” effect. As a result, it can be concluded that What Comes Next Technique give a strong effect in teaching vocabulary for the eleventh grade learners in SMA Negeri 3 Pontianak in the academic year of 2019/2020.

Author Biography

Irfan Agung Wiranto, Tanjungpura University

'15 English Education Study Program

References

Alibali, M. W. & Nathan, M. J. (2012). Embodiment in mathematics teaching and learning: Evidence from learners’and teachers’ gestures. F. Learn.Sci, 2(12), 07-15.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L, C., Sorensen, C., & Razavieh, A., (2010). Introduction to research in education. USA: Wadsworth.

Blerkom, M. L. V., (2009). Measurement and statistic for teacher. New York: Routledge.

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment principles and classroom practices. New York: Longman.

Burns, R. B., (2000). Introduction to research methods. London: Sage Publications.

Cohen, R. L., & Otterbein, N. (1992). The mnemonic effect of speech gestures: Pantomimic and non-pantomimic gestures compared. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 4(2), 113 -139.

Cohen, R. L, Manion, L. & Morrison, K. (2007). Research method in education. New York: Routledge.

Foster, J. K. (2009). Memory: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hatch, E. M., & Farhady, H. (1982). Research design and statistics for applied linguistics. Rowley, Mass: Newbury House.

Laufer, B. (2005). Focus on form in second language vocabulary learning. EUROSLA Yearbook, 5, 223–250.

Lindstromberg, S. (2009). Language activities for teenagers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tellier, M. (2005). How do teacher’s gestures help young children in second language acquisition? Proceedings of the meeting of International Society of Gesture Studies, ISGS 2005: Interacting Bodies, June 15–18, ENS Lyon: France. http://gesturelyon2005.enslsh.fr/IMG/ pdf/TellierFINAL.pdf.

Thyer, B. A. (2012). Pre-experimental research designs. Oxford Scholarship Online. 1.

Downloads

Published

2020-08-16

Issue

Section

Articles